Skip to content

Closing the Gap Between Self-reported and Accelerometer-based Physical Activity

Effect of an Intensity Level Video Demonstration on the Gap Between Self-reported and Accelerometer-measured Physical Activity in Individuals Aged 40 to 75 Years

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03539237
Acronym
GAP
Enrollment
379
Registered
2018-05-29
Start date
2018-05-23
Completion date
2018-11-28
Last updated
2019-01-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Physical Activity

Keywords

Video demonstration, Intensity levels, Physical activity, Self-report, Accelerometer

Brief summary

This study examines the effect of a video-based intensity level demonstration on self-reported physical activity in individuals aged between 40 and 75 years. Aim of the video demonstration is to achieve a better concordance of physical activity reports with accelerometer-based measurements.

Detailed description

This study examines whether the demonstration of different intensity levels of physical activity by video in the context of a tablet PC (personal computer)-based survey can achieve a higher degree of concordance between self-reported and accelerometer-measured physical activity compared to an assessment without video demonstration. The recruitment of the study participants in the age range between 40 and 75 years takes place in a shopping center in the city Greifswald in Germany. Informed consent consists of: (i) activity recording over 7 days using an accelerometer, (ii) completion of standardized questionnaires, (iii) participation in a standardized measurement of weight and height as well as waist and hip circumference. Participants are asked to wear an accelerometer during the day for a period of 7 days. Subsequently, a questionnaire about the frequency, duration and intensity of physical activity in the last 7 days will be answered in the DZHK (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung)- examination center. Prior to the physical activity assessment the study participants are randomly assigned to the study conditions Video or No Video (ratio 1:1). Optionally, participants may receive feedback on their physical activity measured by accelerometer upon completion of the study.

Interventions

OTHERVideo demonstration of physical activity intensity levels

In the video demonstration, an approximately 50 year old male explains 1) light-intensity, 2) moderate-intensity, and 3) vigorous-intensity physical activity referring to differences in heart rate, breathing frequency and capability to talk normally. Simultaneously, on a treadmill he demonstrates the body signs of the three intensity levels. He gives examples and points out that there are individual differences in the intensity evaluation of comparable activities.

Sponsors

Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK)
CollaboratorOTHER
University Medicine Greifswald
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\-

Exclusion criteria

* cognitive impairment * inadequate language skills

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference between physical activity measured by self-report and by accelerometryThe accelerometer is worn for 7 days and then the IPAQ-SF is retrospectively answered for these 7 days.Measures: assessement via tablet PC (International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form, IPAQ-SF) and objective measurement by accelerometry

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026