Physical Activity
Conditions
Keywords
Video demonstration, Intensity levels, Physical activity, Self-report, Accelerometer
Brief summary
This study examines the effect of a video-based intensity level demonstration on self-reported physical activity in individuals aged between 40 and 75 years. Aim of the video demonstration is to achieve a better concordance of physical activity reports with accelerometer-based measurements.
Detailed description
This study examines whether the demonstration of different intensity levels of physical activity by video in the context of a tablet PC (personal computer)-based survey can achieve a higher degree of concordance between self-reported and accelerometer-measured physical activity compared to an assessment without video demonstration. The recruitment of the study participants in the age range between 40 and 75 years takes place in a shopping center in the city Greifswald in Germany. Informed consent consists of: (i) activity recording over 7 days using an accelerometer, (ii) completion of standardized questionnaires, (iii) participation in a standardized measurement of weight and height as well as waist and hip circumference. Participants are asked to wear an accelerometer during the day for a period of 7 days. Subsequently, a questionnaire about the frequency, duration and intensity of physical activity in the last 7 days will be answered in the DZHK (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung)- examination center. Prior to the physical activity assessment the study participants are randomly assigned to the study conditions Video or No Video (ratio 1:1). Optionally, participants may receive feedback on their physical activity measured by accelerometer upon completion of the study.
Interventions
In the video demonstration, an approximately 50 year old male explains 1) light-intensity, 2) moderate-intensity, and 3) vigorous-intensity physical activity referring to differences in heart rate, breathing frequency and capability to talk normally. Simultaneously, on a treadmill he demonstrates the body signs of the three intensity levels. He gives examples and points out that there are individual differences in the intensity evaluation of comparable activities.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
\-
Exclusion criteria
* cognitive impairment * inadequate language skills
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Difference between physical activity measured by self-report and by accelerometry | The accelerometer is worn for 7 days and then the IPAQ-SF is retrospectively answered for these 7 days. | Measures: assessement via tablet PC (International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form, IPAQ-SF) and objective measurement by accelerometry |
Countries
Germany