Skip to content

Nordic-Baltic Coronary Revascularization Study in Patients With Proximal Left Descending Coronary Artery (LAD) Lesion.

The Nordic-Baltic Heart Team Initiative for Improved Long-term Coronary Artery Revascularization Outcome in Patients With Proximal Left Descending Coronary Artery (LAD) Lesion. NOBLE LAD

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03538886
Acronym
NOBLE-LAD
Enrollment
4
Registered
2018-05-29
Start date
2018-06-01
Completion date
2019-07-31
Last updated
2021-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Coronary revascularization

Brief summary

The Nordic-Baltic Heart Team Initiative for improved long-term coronary artery revascularization outcome compares quality of life and survival after coronary bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with 1-vessel disease and proximal stenosis of the anterior descending artery (LAD/in patients with isolated proximal left descending coronary artery (LAD) lesion

Detailed description

It is not clear how operable 1-VD patients with stable or stabilized coronary artery disease involving a pLAD lesion should be treated to optimize long-term survival and quality of life. According to recent European guidelines, significant pLAD disease may be treated by PCI or by CABG. This recommendation is based on two meta-analyses including 1.210 and 1.952 randomized and non-randomized patients. Generally, the patients were followed for 4-5 years. The analyses reported similar rates of mortality, MI and stroke, but more repeat revascularizations after PCI. Only one study including129 patients provided more than 5-year follow-up. Thus, the there is limited documentation for long-term effect of PCI vs. surgical re-vascularization in pLAD disease. The American 2014 Guidelines on coronary revascularization recommends CABG for improved survival in patients with solitary proximal LAD stenosis. CABG The angiographic 90% LIMA patency rate after 1, 2 and 3 decades is well described and suggestive of a survival benefit of surgical revascularization. Therefore, there is scientific background for an CABG LIMA-to-LAD vs. PCI comparison in 1-VD patients with a pLAD lesion. Substantiated expectations: * PCI is superior to bypass operation concerning short-term quality of life. * Off-pump LIMA-to-LAD is superior to PCI concerning long-term all-cause mortality. * Long-term (≥10-year) follow-up is essential to evaluate coronary revascularization strategies. * Outcome may be dependent on lesion complexity, diabetes and gender.

Interventions

Revascularization of LAD lesion by CABG

PROCEDUREPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Revascularization of LAD lesion by PCI

Sponsors

Oulu University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Region Örebro County
CollaboratorOTHER
Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Aalborg University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The clinical outcomes will be assessed by an independent event committee with no knowledge of treatment allocation.

Intervention model description

1:1 randomized clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Heart Team decision on treatment 1-VD patients with stable coronary artery disease or stabilized unstable angina pectoris/NSTEMI or silent ischemia Proximal LAD (pLAD) stenosis (\>90% by visual assessment or FFR \<80% The lesion may be treated by both PCI and surgery

Exclusion criteria

ST-elevation myocardial infarction within 24 hours. Expected survival \<1 year, because of high age or severe cardiac or non-cardiac disease. Significant LM disease. Earlier CABG. PCI within 3 months. Significant valvular heart disease. Renal failure on dialysis Earlier disabling stroke Relative or absolute contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy. Allergy relevant to the study treatments. Age \< 18 years. Study required information and consent suboptimal or impossible.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause mortality10 yearsDeath of any cause
Quality of life1 yearBy SF 12 and Seatle Angina Questionaire
MACCE1 yearMajor cardiac and cerebral adverse events (myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, death)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedure related myocardial infarction1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 yearsMyocardial infarction related to PCI or CABG
Major stroke, minor stroke and al stroke1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 yearsStroke by VARC definition
All-cause death1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 yearsDeath of any cause
Heart failure1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 yearsNYHA class
Stent thrombosis1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 yearsARC-define stent thrombosis
Angina1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 yearsCCS angina class
Cardiac death1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 yearsDeath of cardiac disease
Spontaneous myocardial infarction1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 yearsType 1 myocardial infarction

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026