Skip to content

JUNIPER: A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Biological Activity, and PK of ND-L02-s0201 in Subjects With IPF

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Biological Activity, and PK of ND-L02-s0201 in Subjects With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03538301
Enrollment
123
Registered
2018-05-29
Start date
2018-06-18
Completion date
2022-08-24
Last updated
2023-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Brief summary

A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, biological activity, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ND-L02-s0201 for Injection in subjects with IPF.

Detailed description

All subjects were treated with ND-L02-s0201 or placebo for 24 weeks (a total of 12 doses). Subject's participation in the study was approximately 40 weeks including a Screening and Baseline period of up to 6 weeks, a treatment period of 24 weeks (including the 2 weeks after the last study treatment), and a follow-up period of 10 weeks after End-of-Treatment (EOT).

Interventions

DRUGND-L02-s0201 (Low Dose)

Intravenous administration every 2 weeks

DRUGND-L02-s0201 (High Dose)

Intravenous administration every 2 weeks

Saline

Sponsors

Nitto Denko Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥ 45% of predicted. * Diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) corrected for hemoglobin ≥ 30% of predicted value * Ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) to FVC ≥ 0.70.

Exclusion criteria

* Best, acceptable FVC from separate screening spirometry that differ by ≥ 200 mL. * Respiratory exacerbation(s) or hospitalization for IPF exacerbation within 3 months before screening. * Anticipated to receive a lung transplant during the subject's participation in the study. * Active smoker or smoking cessation within 12 weeks before screening. * Malignancy within the last 5 years, with the exception of curable cancer that has received adequate treatment. * Evidence of any unstable or untreated, clinically significant disease or condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might confound the interpretation of the study or place the subject at increased risk. * Treatment with high dose corticosteroids, cytotoxic agents, unapproved IPF targeted therapy, and cytokine modulating agents within 8 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) before screening * Participation in an investigational study with the last dose of investigational product occurring within 8 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) before screening. * Pregnant or breastfeeding. * Medical history of infection with HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C. * History of alcohol abuse and/or dependence within the last 2 years. * History within the last 2 years of significant mental illness, or physical dependence on any opioid or illicit drugs. Other protocol defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to TEAEsChange in the incidence and severity of adverse events related to study treatment from baseline to 24 weeksThe number of participants with TEAEs leading to discontinuation from the study treatment. The Safety Population (including all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment) is presented. TEAE = treatment-emergent adverse event

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Decline in FVC From Baseline to Week 24Baseline to Week 24Slope in FVC from Baseline to Week 24 (measured in L/week). The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. Slope and standard error are presented. The slope is approximated as least square mean/24 weeks. FVC = forced vital capacity
Rate of Decline in ppFVC From Baseline to Week 24Baseline to Week 24Slope in ppFVC from Baseline to Week 24 (measured in %/week). The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. Slope and standard error are presented. The slope is approximated as least square mean/24 weeks. ppFVC = percent predicted forced vital capacity
Absolute and Relative Change in FVC (L) From Baseline to Week 24Baseline to Week 24Absolute and Relative Change in FVC (L) from Baseline to Week 24. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. FVC = forced vital capacity
Percent Change in FVC From Baseline to Week 24Baseline to Week 24Percent Change in FVC from Baseline to Week 24. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. FVC = forced vital capacity
Absolute and Relative Change in ppFVC (%) From Baseline to Week 24Baseline to Week 24Absolute and Relative Change in ppFVC (%) from Baseline to Week 24. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. ppFVC = percent predicted forced vital capacity
Summary of Study Treatment Response of FVCBaseline to Visit 14 (Day 169)Proportion of participants with an FVC response defined as either having improvement or a decline by 0 to less than or equal to 5%, more than 5% to less than or equal to 10%, and more than 10% at Visit 14 (Day 169). Participants with an FVC response were defined as improvement in FVC (ie, FVC value higher than baseline) or a decline of less than or equal to 10% from baseline. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. FVC = forced vital capacity
Summary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVCBaseline to Visit 14 (Day 169)Proportion of participants with an ppFVC response defined as either having improvement or a decline by 0 to less than or equal to 5%, greater than 5% to less than or equal to 10%, and greater than 10% at Visit 14 (Day 169). Participants with an ppFVC response were defined as improvement in ppFVC (ie, ppFVC value higher than baseline) or a decline of less than or equal to 10% from baseline. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. ppFVC = percent predicted forced vital capacity
Percent Change in ppFVC From Baseline to Week 24Baseline to Week 24Percent Change in ppFVC from Baseline to Week 24. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. ppFVC = percent predicted forced vital capacity
Quantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline to Week 24Changes of interstitial lung abnormalities as measured by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT; ie, change in parenchymal feature \[Baseline to Week 24\]), as determined by qualitative assessment (central radiologist) and quantitative analysis (Quantitative Lung Fibrosis - QLF analysis). Quantitative HRCT parameters included the following: * Quantitative Lung Fibrosis (QLF) score (% of whole lung field volume) * Ground glass opacity (GGO) (% of whole lung field volume) * Reticulation (% of whole lung field volume) * Honeycombing (% of whole lung field volume) * Normal lung (% of whole lung field volume) * Emphysema (low attenuation area \[LAA\]; % of whole lung field volume) The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented.
Qualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline to Visit 14 (Day 169)Changes of interstitial lung abnormalities as measured by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT; ie, change in parenchymal feature \[Baseline to Visit 14 (Day 169)\]), as determined by qualitative assessment (central radiologist). The Likert scale values are included in the descriptions presented. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) with HRCT assessment at Visit 14/Early Termination is presented.
Events of IPF Exacerbation or Death and Rate of First IPF ExacerbationBaseline to study completion, up to Day 239Total number of events of participants who experienced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) exacerbation (ie, an unexplained worsening of dyspnea, evidence of hypoxemia as defined by worsened or severely impaired gas exchange, new radiographic alveolar infiltrates, and an absence of an alternative explanation such as infection, pulmonary embolism, pneumothorax, or heart failure) or death (weeks).
Events of Hospitalization for Respiratory Ailments or Deathup to 12 weeks after the end of study treatmentEvents (participants who experienced hospitalization for respiratory ailments or died) for respiratory ailments are presented. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented.
Total Events of Death Due to All Causesup to 12 weeks after the end of study treatmentRate of mortality due to all causes is presented. Overall survival was defined as the time from start of study treatment to death due to any cause.
Events of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung Transplantation or Death and Rate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung TransplantationBaseline to 12 weeks after end of study treatmentEvents of deterioration of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) resulting in lung transplantation (LP; up to 12 weeks after the end of study treatment) or death (weeks) and rate of deterioration of IPF resulting in lung transplantation (up to 12 weeks after the end of study treatment) are presented. Total events = Participants who experience deterioration of IPF resulting in LP (or died). Rate of Deterioration = Rate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in LP.
Change in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Baseline to Week 24Change in diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and DLCO corrected for hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg) from Baseline to Week 24. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented.

Countries

Germany, Japan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis within 5 years before Visit 1a, confirmed by the Principal Investigator (PI) using American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS)/Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS)/Latin American Thoracic Association (ALAT) guidelines

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Intravenous placebo infusion every 2 weeks (± 4 days for Visit 3 or ± 7 days for Visits 4 to 13, ensuring a minimum of 7 days between each dose) for a total of 12 doses.
42
ND-L02-s0201 45 mg
ND-L02-s0201: 45 mg intravenous administration every 2 weeks (± 4 days for Visit 3 or ± 7 days for Visits 4 to 13, ensuring a minimum of 7 days between each dose) for a total of 12 doses.
41
ND-L02-s0201 90 mg
ND-L02-s0201: 90 mg intravenous administration every 2 weeks (± 4 days for Visit 3 or ± 7 days for Visits 4 to 13, ensuring a minimum of 7 days between each dose) for a total of 12 doses.
40
Total123

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event144
Overall StudyDeath110
Overall StudyPhysician Decision010
Overall StudyProtocol Violation001
Overall StudyTerminated Early from the Study due to COVID-19 Impact967

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicND-L02-s0201 45 mgTotalPlaceboND-L02-s0201 90 mg
Age, Continuous68.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.22
68.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.25
68.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.16
69.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.53
Background Standard of Care
Nintedanib
17 Participants50 Participants17 Participants16 Participants
Background Standard of Care
None
10 Participants30 Participants10 Participants10 Participants
Background Standard of Care
Pirfenidone
14 Participants43 Participants15 Participants14 Participants
Baseline Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide Corrected for Hemoglobin12.972 mL/min/mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6453
12.647 mL/min/mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6223
12.574 mL/min/mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9023
12.391 mL/min/mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3503
Baseline Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second2.380 litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5345
2.308 litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5592
2.270 litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5603
2.274 litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.589
Baseline Forced Vital Capacity3.012 litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6866
2.921 litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7188
2.861 litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7214
2.890 litres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7562
Baseline Hemoglobin Corrected percent predicted DLCO53.739 % of normal DLCO
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1901
52.471 % of normal DLCO
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5264
51.762 % of normal DLCO
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.797
51.914 % of normal DLCO
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6957
Baseline Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume81.959 % of normal FEV
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8182
79.190 % of normal FEV
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8442
76.890 % of normal FEV
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.8868
78.766 % of normal FEV
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.6653
Baseline Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (%)79.319 % of total normal FVC
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.994
76.618 % of total normal FVC
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.7595
73.943 % of total normal FVC
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.0078
76.658 % of total normal FVC
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.127
Baseline Pulse Oximetry (%)96.6 % of oxygen saturated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.99
96.7 % of oxygen saturated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
96.5 % of oxygen saturated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.11
96.9 % of oxygen saturated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.93
Baseline Ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second/Forced Vital Capacity0.794 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.0383
0.792 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.0445
0.795 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.0501
0.787 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.045
Body mass index group
Normal (18.5 - 24.9)
11 Participants33 Participants12 Participants10 Participants
Body mass index group
Obese (30 and above)
13 Participants36 Participants15 Participants8 Participants
Body mass index group
Overweight (25 - 29.9)
17 Participants54 Participants15 Participants22 Participants
Body mass index group
Underweight (below 18.5)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Body mass index (kg/m^2)28.093 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3072
28.221 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5151
28.765 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7625
27.780 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5129
Duration of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis24.678 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3543
26.734 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4642
28.227 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.4342
27.272 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7152
Eligibility Criteria Based on high resolution computed tomography
Consistent with UIP
10 Participants27 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Eligibility Criteria Based on high resolution computed tomography
Definite UIP
26 Participants78 Participants30 Participants22 Participants
Eligibility Criteria Based on high resolution computed tomography
Inconsistent with UIP
5 Participants17 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Eligibility Criteria Based on high resolution computed tomography
Possible UIP
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Eligibility Criteria Based on high resolution computed tomography
Unknown
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants11 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
39 Participants112 Participants37 Participants36 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
GAP IPF Stage
I (0 to 3 points. This stage has the lowest risk of mortality
29 Participants78 Participants24 Participants25 Participants
GAP IPF Stage
II (4 to 5 points. This stage has a moderate risk of mortality)
11 Participants43 Participants17 Participants15 Participants
GAP IPF Stage
III (6 to 8 points. This stage has the highest risk of mortality)
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Height172.316 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5278
172.085 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8564
172.399 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5281
171.519 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2947
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
10 Participants24 Participants7 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
29 Participants94 Participants34 Participants31 Participants
Risk of Mortality at 1-year12.584 risk ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9287
13.753 risk ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1532
14.726 risk ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.157
13.930 risk ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.0984
Risk of Mortality at 2-year24.922 risk ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.0103
26.897 risk ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9697
28.505 risk ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5204
27.233 risk ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.0164
Risk of Mortality at 3-year36.014 risk ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9575
38.418 risk ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2311
40.335 risk ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9727
38.869 risk ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4372
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants18 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants105 Participants37 Participants34 Participants
Smoking History
No
14 Participants44 Participants16 Participants14 Participants
Smoking History
Yes
27 Participants79 Participants26 Participants26 Participants
Weight84.234 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.0174
84.050 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.3109
85.579 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4326
82.255 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.6139

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 421 / 410 / 40
other
Total, other adverse events
35 / 4237 / 4137 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 424 / 416 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to TEAEs

The number of participants with TEAEs leading to discontinuation from the study treatment. The Safety Population (including all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment) is presented. TEAE = treatment-emergent adverse event

Time frame: Change in the incidence and severity of adverse events related to study treatment from baseline to 24 weeks

Population: Safety Population (includes all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to TEAEs1 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgNumber of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to TEAEs3 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgNumber of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to TEAEs4 Participants
Secondary

Absolute and Relative Change in FVC (L) From Baseline to Week 24

Absolute and Relative Change in FVC (L) from Baseline to Week 24. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. FVC = forced vital capacity

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute and Relative Change in FVC (L) From Baseline to Week 24Week 24 FVC (L)2.7946 litresStandard Error 0.10946
PlaceboAbsolute and Relative Change in FVC (L) From Baseline to Week 24Baseline FVC (L)2.8754 litresStandard Error 0.11079
PlaceboAbsolute and Relative Change in FVC (L) From Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 24 in FVC (L)-0.0808 litresStandard Error 0.03425
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgAbsolute and Relative Change in FVC (L) From Baseline to Week 24Week 24 FVC (L)2.8438 litresStandard Error 0.11144
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgAbsolute and Relative Change in FVC (L) From Baseline to Week 24Baseline FVC (L)3.0242 litresStandard Error 0.11207
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgAbsolute and Relative Change in FVC (L) From Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 24 in FVC (L)-0.1805 litresStandard Error 0.03668
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgAbsolute and Relative Change in FVC (L) From Baseline to Week 24Baseline FVC (L)2.9032 litresStandard Error 0.11328
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgAbsolute and Relative Change in FVC (L) From Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 24 in FVC (L)-0.1315 litresStandard Error 0.03696
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgAbsolute and Relative Change in FVC (L) From Baseline to Week 24Week 24 FVC (L)2.7717 litresStandard Error 0.11253
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in FVC (L) in the 45 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.04995% CI: [-0.1988, -0.0005]random coefficient model
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in FVC (L) in the 90 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.31695% CI: [-0.1502, 0.0489]random coefficient model
Secondary

Absolute and Relative Change in ppFVC (%) From Baseline to Week 24

Absolute and Relative Change in ppFVC (%) from Baseline to Week 24. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. ppFVC = percent predicted forced vital capacity

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT Population (include any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute and Relative Change in ppFVC (%) From Baseline to Week 24Week 24 ppFVC72.2552 percentStandard Error 2.58376
PlaceboAbsolute and Relative Change in ppFVC (%) From Baseline to Week 24Baseline ppFVC74.5701 percentStandard Error 2.54894
PlaceboAbsolute and Relative Change in ppFVC (%) From Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 24 in ppFVC-2.3149 percentStandard Error 0.89678
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgAbsolute and Relative Change in ppFVC (%) From Baseline to Week 24Week 24 ppFVC75.3849 percentStandard Error 2.63382
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgAbsolute and Relative Change in ppFVC (%) From Baseline to Week 24Baseline ppFVC79.8896 percentStandard Error 2.57837
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgAbsolute and Relative Change in ppFVC (%) From Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 24 in ppFVC-4.5046 percentStandard Error 0.96141
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgAbsolute and Relative Change in ppFVC (%) From Baseline to Week 24Baseline ppFVC77.2260 percentStandard Error 2.60623
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgAbsolute and Relative Change in ppFVC (%) From Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 24 in ppFVC-3.2652 percentStandard Error 0.96873
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgAbsolute and Relative Change in ppFVC (%) From Baseline to Week 24Week 24 ppFVC73.9607 percentStandard Error 2.65995
Comparison: Change from baseline to Week 24 in ppFVCp-value: 0.09895% CI: [-4.7869, 0.4075]random coefficient model
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in ppFVCp-value: 0.47395% CI: [-3.5579, 1.6573]random coefficient model
Secondary

Change in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24

Change in diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and DLCO corrected for hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg) from Baseline to Week 24. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT Population (include any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Baseline DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)12.6709 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.56489
PlaceboChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Week 24 DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)11.7541 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.58748
PlaceboChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 24 in DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)-0.9169 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.2695
PlaceboChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Baseline DLCO Not Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)12.4411 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.55897
PlaceboChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Week 24 DLCO Not Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)11.5720 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.57137
PlaceboChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 24 in DLCO Not Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)-0.8691 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.26307
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 24 in DLCO Not Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)-0.7551 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.27406
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Baseline DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)13.0723 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.57141
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Baseline DLCO Not Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)12.9860 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.56543
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Week 24 DLCO Not Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)12.2308 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.58226
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Week 24 DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)12.3015 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.59845
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 24 in DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)-0.7708 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.28085
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Week 24 DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)12.2669 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.6046
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 24 in DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)-0.2131 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.28408
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 24 in DLCO Not Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)-0.3131 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.27721
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Baseline DLCO Not Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)12.3792 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.57155
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Baseline DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)12.4800 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.57759
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgChange in DLCO and DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin From Baseline to Week 24Week 24 DLCO Not Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg)12.0661 mL/min/mmHgStandard Error 0.58804
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg) in the 45 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.70895% CI: [-0.6226, 0.9147]random coefficient
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in DLCO Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg) in the 90 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.07495% CI: [-0.0695, 1.4771]random coefficient
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in DLCO Not Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg) in the 45 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.76595% CI: [-0.6362, 0.8641]random coefficient model
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in DLCO Not Corrected for Hemoglobin (mL/min/mmHg) in the 90 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.14895% CI: [-0.1986, 1.3107]random coefficient model
Secondary

Events of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung Transplantation or Death and Rate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung Transplantation

Events of deterioration of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) resulting in lung transplantation (LP; up to 12 weeks after the end of study treatment) or death (weeks) and rate of deterioration of IPF resulting in lung transplantation (up to 12 weeks after the end of study treatment) are presented. Total events = Participants who experience deterioration of IPF resulting in LP (or died). Rate of Deterioration = Rate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in LP.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks after end of study treatment

Population: ITT Population (include any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboEvents of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung Transplantation or Death and Rate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung TransplantationTotal events to Deterioration of IPF Resulting in LP or Death:3 events
PlaceboEvents of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung Transplantation or Death and Rate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung TransplantationRate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in LP: Total Events2 events
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgEvents of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung Transplantation or Death and Rate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung TransplantationTotal events to Deterioration of IPF Resulting in LP or Death:1 events
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgEvents of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung Transplantation or Death and Rate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung TransplantationRate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in LP: Total Events0 events
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgEvents of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung Transplantation or Death and Rate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung TransplantationTotal events to Deterioration of IPF Resulting in LP or Death:0 events
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgEvents of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung Transplantation or Death and Rate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung TransplantationRate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in LP: Total Events0 events
Comparison: Rate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung Transplantation (%) in the 45 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.49495% CI: [-16.6, 4.6]Fisher Exact
Comparison: Rate of Deterioration of IPF Resulting in Lung Transplantation (%) in the 90 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.49495% CI: [-16.2, 4.5]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Events of Hospitalization for Respiratory Ailments or Death

Events (participants who experienced hospitalization for respiratory ailments or died) for respiratory ailments are presented. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented.

Time frame: up to 12 weeks after the end of study treatment

Population: ITT Population (include any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboEvents of Hospitalization for Respiratory Ailments or Death5 events
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgEvents of Hospitalization for Respiratory Ailments or Death3 events
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgEvents of Hospitalization for Respiratory Ailments or Death3 events
Comparison: Rate of Hospitalization for Respiratory Ailments (%) in the 45 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.71395% CI: [-19.2, 9.6]Fisher Exact
Comparison: Rate of Hospitalization for Respiratory Ailments (%) in the 90 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.71395% CI: [-19.2, 10.7]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Events of IPF Exacerbation or Death and Rate of First IPF Exacerbation

Total number of events of participants who experienced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) exacerbation (ie, an unexplained worsening of dyspnea, evidence of hypoxemia as defined by worsened or severely impaired gas exchange, new radiographic alveolar infiltrates, and an absence of an alternative explanation such as infection, pulmonary embolism, pneumothorax, or heart failure) or death (weeks).

Time frame: Baseline to study completion, up to Day 239

Population: ITT Population (include any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboEvents of IPF Exacerbation or Death and Rate of First IPF Exacerbation7 events
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgEvents of IPF Exacerbation or Death and Rate of First IPF Exacerbation3 events
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgEvents of IPF Exacerbation or Death and Rate of First IPF Exacerbation4 events
Comparison: Time to First IPF Exacerbation or Death (weeks) in the 45 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.51795% CI: [0.189, 2.225]Log Rank
Comparison: Time to First IPF Exacerbation or Death (weeks) in the 90 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.50695% CI: [0.198, 2.324]Log Rank
Comparison: Rate of First IPF Exacerbation (%) in the 45 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.31395% CI: [-25.2, 5.5]Fisher Exact
Comparison: Rate of First IPF Exacerbation (%) in the 90 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.37695% CI: [-22.6, 9.2]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percent Change in FVC From Baseline to Week 24

Percent Change in FVC from Baseline to Week 24. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. FVC = forced vital capacity

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT Population (include any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change in FVC From Baseline to Week 24-3.10 percentageStandard Error 4.793
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgPercent Change in FVC From Baseline to Week 24-5.64 percentageStandard Error 4.488
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgPercent Change in FVC From Baseline to Week 24-4.23 percentageStandard Error 4.723
p-value: 0.66895% CI: [-17.59, 11.28]random coefficient model
p-value: 0.82195% CI: [-16.57, 13.13]random coefficient model
Secondary

Percent Change in ppFVC From Baseline to Week 24

Percent Change in ppFVC from Baseline to Week 24. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. ppFVC = percent predicted forced vital capacity

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT Population (include any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change in ppFVC From Baseline to Week 24-3.10 percentageStandard Error 4.793
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgPercent Change in ppFVC From Baseline to Week 24-5.64 percentageStandard Error 4.488
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgPercent Change in ppFVC From Baseline to Week 24-4.23 percentageStandard Error 4.723
p-value: 0.795% CI: [-15.4, 10.34]random coefficient model
p-value: 0.86795% CI: [-14.31, 12.07]random coefficient model
Secondary

Qualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCT

Changes of interstitial lung abnormalities as measured by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT; ie, change in parenchymal feature \[Baseline to Visit 14 (Day 169)\]), as determined by qualitative assessment (central radiologist). The Likert scale values are included in the descriptions presented. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) with HRCT assessment at Visit 14/Early Termination is presented.

Time frame: Baseline to Visit 14 (Day 169)

Population: ITT Population (include any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) with HRCT assessment at Visit 14/Early Termination

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTSame (3)28 Participants
PlaceboQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTMuch better (5)0 Participants
PlaceboQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWorse (2)6 Participants
PlaceboQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTUnknown0 Participants
PlaceboQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBetter (4)0 Participants
PlaceboQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTMuch worse (1)3 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBetter (4)0 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTMuch better (5)0 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTSame (3)26 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWorse (2)3 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTMuch worse (1)1 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTUnknown0 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBetter (4)1 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTUnknown0 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTMuch worse (1)2 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTSame (3)28 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTMuch better (5)0 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQualitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWorse (2)3 Participants
p-value: 0.256Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.241Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Quantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCT

Changes of interstitial lung abnormalities as measured by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT; ie, change in parenchymal feature \[Baseline to Week 24\]), as determined by qualitative assessment (central radiologist) and quantitative analysis (Quantitative Lung Fibrosis - QLF analysis). Quantitative HRCT parameters included the following: * Quantitative Lung Fibrosis (QLF) score (% of whole lung field volume) * Ground glass opacity (GGO) (% of whole lung field volume) * Reticulation (% of whole lung field volume) * Honeycombing (% of whole lung field volume) * Normal lung (% of whole lung field volume) * Emphysema (low attenuation area \[LAA\]; % of whole lung field volume) The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT Population (include any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in QLF Score (% of whole lung field volume)2.28 percentageStandard Error 1.08
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline Reticulation (% of whole lung field volume)27.46 percentageStandard Error 1.89
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline Emphysema (% of whole lung field volume)9.62 percentageStandard Error 1.64
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 Normal Lung (% of whole lung field volume)56.42 percentageStandard Error 2.287
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 Reticulation (% of whole lung field volume)28.13 percentageStandard Error 2.001
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in Ground Glass Opacity (% of whole lung field volume)-0.23 percentageStandard Error 0.177
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 QLF Score (% of whole lung field volume)35.87 percentageStandard Error 2.195
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in Reticulation (% of whole lung field volume)0.67 percentageStandard Error 0.964
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 Emphysema (% of whole lung field volume)12.08 percentageStandard Error 1.646
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline Normal Lung (% of whole lung field volume)58.47 percentageStandard Error 2.281
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline Honeycombing (% of whole lung field volume)4.54 percentageStandard Error 0.861
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in Estimation of Normal Lung (% of whole lung field volume)-2.05 percentageStandard Error 1.027
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline Ground Glass Opacity (% of whole lung field volume)5.01 percentageStandard Error 0.357
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 Honeycombing (% of whole lung field volume)6.36 percentageStandard Error 1.018
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in Estimation of Emphysema (% of whole lung field volume)2.46 percentageStandard Error 0.936
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 Ground Glass Opacity (% of whole lung field volume)4.77 percentageStandard Error 0.358
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in Honeycombing (% of whole lung field volume)1.81 percentageStandard Error 0.542
PlaceboQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline QLF Score (% of whole lung field volume)33.59 percentageStandard Error 2.189
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in Honeycombing (% of whole lung field volume)0.61 percentageStandard Error 0.604
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline Normal Lung (% of whole lung field volume)64.52 percentageStandard Error 2.544
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 Ground Glass Opacity (% of whole lung field volume)4.49 percentageStandard Error 0.4
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in Estimation of Normal Lung (% of whole lung field volume)-1.17 percentageStandard Error 1.134
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline Emphysema (% of whole lung field volume)10.66 percentageStandard Error 1.829
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 Emphysema (% of whole lung field volume)9.54 percentageStandard Error 1.835
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in Ground Glass Opacity (% of whole lung field volume)-0.41 percentageStandard Error 0.195
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in Estimation of Emphysema (% of whole lung field volume)-1.12 percentageStandard Error 1.034
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in QLF Score (% of whole lung field volume)1.79 percentageStandard Error 1.194
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline Reticulation (% of whole lung field volume)23.69 percentageStandard Error 2.108
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 Normal Lung (% of whole lung field volume)63.35 percentageStandard Error 2.549
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 Reticulation (% of whole lung field volume)24.97 percentageStandard Error 2.231
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in Reticulation (% of whole lung field volume)1.28 percentageStandard Error 1.069
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 QLF Score (% of whole lung field volume)29.24 percentageStandard Error 2.447
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline Honeycombing (% of whole lung field volume)2.50 percentageStandard Error 0.961
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 Honeycombing (% of whole lung field volume)3.11 percentageStandard Error 1.135
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline Ground Glass Opacity (% of whole lung field volume)4.91 percentageStandard Error 0.399
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline QLF Score (% of whole lung field volume)27.45 percentageStandard Error 2.441
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in Estimation of Emphysema (% of whole lung field volume)0.31 percentageStandard Error 0.964
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 QLF Score (% of whole lung field volume)30.89 percentageStandard Error 2.258
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 Normal Lung (% of whole lung field volume)62.68 percentageStandard Error 2.352
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in QLF Score (% of whole lung field volume)3.67 percentageStandard Error 1.112
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline Ground Glass Opacity (% of whole lung field volume)4.72 percentageStandard Error 0.367
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 Ground Glass Opacity (% of whole lung field volume)4.52 percentageStandard Error 0.369
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in Ground Glass Opacity (% of whole lung field volume)-0.20 percentageStandard Error 0.182
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline Reticulation (% of whole lung field volume)24.03 percentageStandard Error 1.943
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 Reticulation (% of whole lung field volume)26.34 percentageStandard Error 2.062
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in Reticulation (% of whole lung field volume)2.32 percentageStandard Error 1.01
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline Honeycombing (% of whole lung field volume)1.54 percentageStandard Error 0.886
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 Honeycombing (% of whole lung field volume)2.37 percentageStandard Error 1.047
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in Honeycombing (% of whole lung field volume)0.83 percentageStandard Error 0.558
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline Normal Lung (% of whole lung field volume)65.57 percentageStandard Error 2.343
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline QLF Score (% of whole lung field volume)27.22 percentageStandard Error 2.249
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTChange from Baseline to Week 24 in Estimation of Normal Lung (% of whole lung field volume)-2.88 percentageStandard Error 1.057
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTBaseline Emphysema (% of whole lung field volume)8.14 percentageStandard Error 1.684
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgQuantitative Changes of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities as Measured by HRCTWeek 24 Emphysema (% of whole lung field volume)8.45 percentageStandard Error 1.694
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in QLF Score (% of whole lung field volume) in the 45 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.76595% CI: [-3.68, 2.71]random coefficient model
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in QLF Score (% of whole lung field volume) in the 90 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.3795% CI: [-1.68, 4.47]random coefficient model
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in Ground Glass Opacity (% of whole lung field volume) in the 45 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.49995% CI: [-0.7, 0.34]random coefficient model
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in Ground Glass Opacity (% of whole lung field volume) in the 90 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.90195% CI: [-0.47, 0.54]random coefficient model
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in Reticulation (% of whole lung field volume) in the 45 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.67695% CI: [-2.25, 3.46]random coefficient model
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in Reticulation (% of whole lung field volume) in the 90 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.24295% CI: [-1.13, 4.42]random coefficient model
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in Honeycombing (% of whole lung field volume) in the 45 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.1495% CI: [-2.82, 0.4]random coefficient model
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in Honeycombing (% of whole lung field volume) in the 90 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.21195% CI: [-2.53, 0.56]random coefficient model
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in Normal Lung (% of whole lung field volume) in the 45 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.56895% CI: [-2.16, 3.91]random coefficient model
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in Normal Lung (% of whole lung field volume) in the 90 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.57395% CI: [-3.76, 2.09]random coefficient model
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in Emphysema (% of whole lung field volume) in the 45 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.01295% CI: [-6.35, -0.81]random coefficient model
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 24 in Emphysema (% of whole lung field volume) in the 90 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.11295% CI: [-4.82, 0.51]random coefficient model
Secondary

Rate of Decline in FVC From Baseline to Week 24

Slope in FVC from Baseline to Week 24 (measured in L/week). The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. Slope and standard error are presented. The slope is approximated as least square mean/24 weeks. FVC = forced vital capacity

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT Population (include any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboRate of Decline in FVC From Baseline to Week 24-0.003366 litres/weekStandard Error 0.0014272
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgRate of Decline in FVC From Baseline to Week 24-0.007519 litres/weekStandard Error 0.0015285
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgRate of Decline in FVC From Baseline to Week 24-0.005478 litres/weekStandard Error 0.00154
Comparison: Slope in FVC (L/week) in the 45 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.04995% CI: [-0.008284, -0.000021]random coefficient model
Comparison: Slope in FVC (L/week) in the 90 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.31695% CI: [-0.00626, 0.002036]random coefficient model
Secondary

Rate of Decline in ppFVC From Baseline to Week 24

Slope in ppFVC from Baseline to Week 24 (measured in %/week). The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. Slope and standard error are presented. The slope is approximated as least square mean/24 weeks. ppFVC = percent predicted forced vital capacity

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT Population (include any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboRate of Decline in ppFVC From Baseline to Week 24-0.096455 %/weekStandard Error 0.0373658
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgRate of Decline in ppFVC From Baseline to Week 24-0.187694 %/weekStandard Error 0.0400588
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgRate of Decline in ppFVC From Baseline to Week 24-0.136051 %/weekStandard Error 0.0403636
p-value: 0.09895% CI: [-0.199456, 0.016979]random coefficient model
p-value: 0.47395% CI: [-0.148248, 0.069056]random coefficient model
Secondary

Summary of Study Treatment Response of FVC

Proportion of participants with an FVC response defined as either having improvement or a decline by 0 to less than or equal to 5%, more than 5% to less than or equal to 10%, and more than 10% at Visit 14 (Day 169). Participants with an FVC response were defined as improvement in FVC (ie, FVC value higher than baseline) or a decline of less than or equal to 10% from baseline. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. FVC = forced vital capacity

Time frame: Baseline to Visit 14 (Day 169)

Population: ITT Population (include any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) with FVC assessment at Visit 14

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboSummary of Study Treatment Response of FVCDecline >10%3 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Study Treatment Response of FVCDecline >5% to ≤10%8 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Study Treatment Response of FVCImprovement9 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Study Treatment Response of FVCDecline ≥0% to ≤5%10 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Study Treatment Response of FVCTest not done12 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of FVCDecline >5% to ≤10%6 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of FVCImprovement7 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of FVCDecline ≥0% to ≤5%6 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of FVCDecline >10%7 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of FVCTest not done15 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of FVCTest not done15 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of FVCDecline >10%4 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of FVCImprovement5 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of FVCDecline >5% to ≤10%6 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of FVCDecline ≥0% to ≤5%10 Participants
Secondary

Summary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVC

Proportion of participants with an ppFVC response defined as either having improvement or a decline by 0 to less than or equal to 5%, greater than 5% to less than or equal to 10%, and greater than 10% at Visit 14 (Day 169). Participants with an ppFVC response were defined as improvement in ppFVC (ie, ppFVC value higher than baseline) or a decline of less than or equal to 10% from baseline. The intent-to-treat population (any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) is presented. ppFVC = percent predicted forced vital capacity

Time frame: Baseline to Visit 14 (Day 169)

Population: ITT Population (include any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization) with ppFVC assessment at Visit 14

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboSummary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVCDecline >10%3 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVCDecline >5% to ≤10%8 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVCImprovement9 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVCDecline ≥0% to ≤5%10 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVCTest not done12 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVCDecline >5% to ≤10%6 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVCImprovement7 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVCDecline ≥0% to ≤5%6 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVCDecline >10%7 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVCTest not done15 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVCTest not done15 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVCDecline >10%4 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVCImprovement5 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVCDecline >5% to ≤10%6 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgSummary of Study Treatment Response of ppFVCDecline ≥0% to ≤5%10 Participants
Secondary

Total Events of Death Due to All Causes

Rate of mortality due to all causes is presented. Overall survival was defined as the time from start of study treatment to death due to any cause.

Time frame: up to 12 weeks after the end of study treatment

Population: ITT Population (include any randomized participants with treatment assignment according to the planned randomization)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboTotal Events of Death Due to All Causes1 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 45 mgTotal Events of Death Due to All Causes1 Participants
ND-L02-s0201 90 mgTotal Events of Death Due to All Causes0 Participants
Comparison: Overall Survival (weeks) in the 45 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.937Log Rank
Comparison: Overall Survival (weeks) in the 90 mg cohort versus placebop-value: 0.414Log Rank
Comparison: Rate of Mortality (%) in the 45 mg cohort versus placebop-value: >0.99995% CI: [-10.4, 10.9]Fisher Exact
Comparison: Rate of Mortality (%) in the 90 mg cohort versus placebop-value: >0.99995% CI: [-13.1, 6.8]Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026