Skip to content

Cognitive Support Program for Patients With Brain Metastases

Cognitive Support Program for Patients With Brain Metastases

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03537911
Enrollment
18
Registered
2018-05-25
Start date
2017-07-01
Completion date
2018-11-28
Last updated
2019-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastases, CNS

Brief summary

This study evaluates the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a brief cognitive-behavioural program designed to improve cognitive functioning in people with brain metastases.

Detailed description

Cognitive impairments (such as problems with attention, executive functions, memory and language abilities) are common in people with brain metastases as a result of disease and/or treatment effects. These impairments can significantly limit functional independence, participation in valued roles and activities, and overall quality of life. Building on research in other cognitively-impaired populations, we designed a brief, structured, patient-centered Cognitive Support Program (CSP) for brain metastases patients, who have the option of participating with a caregiver. Program contents include supportive psychoeducation, mindfulness practice, and strategy training (e.g., strategies to improve memory or concentration). This prospective, single-arm study will enroll 24 brain metastases patients to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the CSP. A battery of outcome measures is administered (1) prior to intervention, (2) after completing the CSP, and (3) after an additional 3 months to evaluate longer-term outcomes. Feasibility assessment will include program retention and adherence. Reliable change analyses will examine treatment effects, with regression analyses to explore moderating effects of select patient, disease and treatment factors (e.g., severity of baseline cognitive impairment, number of brain lesions, cranial radiation dose and distribution). Results of this trial will inform further development and implementation of evidence-based supportive care for cognitively-impaired brain metastases patients.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCognitive Support Program

Three individual sessions of supportive psychoeducation, mindfulness practice, and strategy training (e.g., strategies to improve memory or concentration), with practice applying program content between sessions.

Sponsors

University Health Network, Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age 18 or older * able to provide informed consent to all procedures * diagnosis of one or more brain metastases, with primary cancer outside the CNS * indication of cognitive deficits from self-report and/or cognitive testing * interest in participating in a cognitive rehabilitation program * able to complete study activities

Exclusion criteria

* concurrent non-cancer-related neurological or major psychiatric disorder or other medical condition suspected to influence cognition

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - CognitiveBaseline; 2 months (0-2 weeks post-training); 5 months (3 months post-training)Multi-domain cognitive symptom questionnaire completed at each time point. Raw scores are converted to z-scores (M = 0, SD = 1, higher scores = better functioning) according to published criteria, and change from baseline to post-training and to 3-month follow-up calculated by subtraction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - RevisedBaseline; 2 months (0-2 weeks post-training); 5 months (3 months post-training)Neurocognitive test of memory completed at each time point. Raw scores are converted to z-scores (M = 0, SD = 1, higher scores = better functioning) according to published criteria, and change from baseline to post-training and to 3-month follow-up calculated by subtraction.
Trail Making TestBaseline; 2 months (0-2 weeks post-training); 5 months (3 months post-training)Neurocognitive test of processing speed and executive function completed at each time point. Raw scores are converted to z-scores (M = 0, SD = 1, higher scores = better functioning) according to published criteria, and change from baseline to post-training and to 3-month follow-up calculated by subtraction.
Wechsler Digit Span TestBaseline; 2 months (0-2 weeks post-training); 5 months (3 months post-training)Neurocognitive test of working memory completed at each time point. Raw scores are converted to z-scores (M = 0, SD = 1, higher scores = better functioning) according to published criteria, and change from baseline to post-training and to 3-month follow-up calculated by subtraction.
BADS Zoo Map TestBaseline; 2 months (0-2 weeks post-training); 5 months (3 months post-training)Neurocognitive test of executive function completed at each time point. Raw scores are converted to z-scores (M = 0, SD = 1, higher scores = better functioning) according to published criteria, and change from baseline to post-training and to 3-month follow-up calculated by subtraction.
Frontal Systems Behavior ScaleBaseline; 2 months (0-2 weeks post-training); 5 months (3 months post-training)Executive cognitive symptom questionnaire completed at each time point. Raw scores are converted to z-scores (M = 0, SD = 1, higher scores = better functioning) according to published criteria, and change from baseline to post-training and to 3-month follow-up calculated by subtraction.
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - BrainBaseline; 2 months (0-2 weeks post-training); 5 months (3 months post-training)Health-related quality of life questionnaire completed at each time point. Raw scores are converted to z-scores (M = 0, SD = 1, higher scores = better functioning) according to published criteria, and change from baseline to post-training and to 3-month follow-up calculated by subtraction.
Positive and Negative Affect ScheduleBaseline; 2 months (0-2 weeks post-training); 5 months (3 months post-training)Quality of life (well-being) questionnaire completed at each time point. Raw scores are converted to z-scores (M = 0, SD = 1, higher scores = better functioning) according to published criteria, and change from baseline to post-training and to 3-month follow-up calculated by subtraction.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleBaseline; 2 months (0-2 weeks post-training); 5 months (3 months post-training)Quality of life (psychological distress) questionnaire completed at each time point. Raw scores are converted to z-scores (M = 0, SD = 1, higher scores = better functioning) according to published criteria, and change from baseline to post-training and to 3-month follow-up calculated by subtraction.
Illness Intrusiveness Rating ScaleBaseline; 2 months (0-2 weeks post-training); 5 months (3 months post-training)Quality of life (activity participation) questionnaire completed at each time point. Raw scores are converted to z-scores (M = 0, SD = 1, higher scores = better functioning) according to published criteria, and change from baseline to post-training and to 3-month follow-up calculated by subtraction.
Controlled Oral Word Association TestBaseline; 2 months (0-2 weeks post-training); 5 months (3 months post-training)Neurocognitive test of verbal fluency completed at each time point. Raw scores are converted to z-scores (M = 0, SD = 1, higher scores = better functioning) according to published criteria, and change from baseline to post-training and to 3-month follow-up calculated by subtraction.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026