Skip to content

Efficiency of Vitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 on Transcriptomic Changes of Low Vitamin D Responders

Comparing the Efficiency of Vitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 Treatment on Changes of the Transcriptome of Low Vitamin D Responders

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03537027
Acronym
VitDHiD
Enrollment
40
Registered
2018-05-25
Start date
2018-05-03
Completion date
2018-05-31
Last updated
2018-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Serum 25(OH)D Concentration, Vitamin D Receptor Target Gene Expression

Keywords

vitamin D3, cholecalciferol, calcidiol, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, gene expression, vitamin D receptor, adults, clinical trial

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to investigate in vivo whether a high-dose vitamin D3 oral bolus (2000 micrograms) produces marked vitamin D receptor target gene expression response and whether there is large inter-individual variation. These effects are compared to in vitro treatment of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from these subjects with 25(OH)D.

Detailed description

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 \[25(OH)D3\] is a well-established marker for vitamin D status of the human body. In addition to the general importance of vitamin D for bone health, low serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations have been associated with increased risk of several health outcomes, such as autoimmune diseases, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular complications. However, there is significant inter-individual variation in the average serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations and also in the response to supplementation with vitamin D. Genetic and epigenetic factors have been suggested to be responsible for a large part of the variation, but currently there is little information about the health effects of the variation. In our previous studies VitDmet (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01479933) and VitDbol (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02063334) we showed that the participants can be classified into high, mid and low responders to vitamin D and defined the new biomarker vitamin D response index. Some 25% of the population seem to be low responders and are under higher risk to suffer from insufficient supplementation with vitamin D. The current study will focus on low vitamin D responders (among the 40 healthy individuals recruited in the study, 20-60 years old), i.e. it will use the same oral vitamin D3 bolus (2,000 µg, i.e. 80,000 IU in one day) as in our VitDbol study, in order to identify low vitamin D responders. By in vitro treatment of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of low responders with 25(OH)D3 for 24 h (in comparison to in vitro stimulations with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 \[1,25(OH)2D3\] and in vivo vitamin D3 supplementation of the same subjects) we will obtain samples that allow the transcriptome-wide investigation of changes in gene expression. The underlying hypothesis of this study is that a stimulation with 25(OH)D3 is more efficient than a treatment with vitamin D3, so that in future low vitamin D responders may be supplemented with 25(OH)D3 rather than with vitamin D3.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTVitamin D3

In total 20 pills will be taken by the subjects, each containing 100 micrograms of vitamin D3, resulting in the total amount of 2000 micrograms of vitamin D3. Of the 20 pills, 10 will be taken in the morning with breakfast and 10 with lunch.

Sponsors

DSM Nutritional Products, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Eastern Finland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Non-smoking * BMI 20-25 kg/m2.

Exclusion criteria

* History of kidney stones, renal failure or dialysis, hypercalcemia, hypo- or hyperparathyroidism, severe liver disease (cirrhosis), or sarcoidosis or other granulomatous diseases, such as active chronic tuberculosis or Wegener's granulomatosis. * Continuous use of anti-inflammatory medicines. * Regular use of supplements containing over 20 micrograms of vitamin D.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
In vivo change from baseline in vitamin D target gene expression in the subjects24 hours after the baselineEffect of 2000 microgram vitamin D3 dose on the expression of vitamin D receptor target genes
In vitro change from baseline in vitamin D target gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells24 hours after the baselineEffects of treatment of cells for 24 h with 100 nM of 25(OH)D3, 1 nM of 1,25(OH)2D3 or vehicle (solvent) on the expression of vitamin D receptor target genes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
In vivo change from baseline in serum alanine transaminase concentration (safety and tolerability)24 hours after the baselineEffect of 2000 microgram vitamin D3 dose on in vivo changes in serum alanine transaminase (ALAT) concentrations
In vivo change from baseline in serum 25(OH)D concentration24 hours after the baselineEffect of 2000 microgram vitamin D3 dose on serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations
In vivo change from baseline in serum creatinine concentration (safety and tolerability)24 hours after the baselineEffect of 2000 microgram vitamin D3 dose on in vivo changes in serum creatinine concentrations
In vivo change from baseline in serum gamma-glutamyl transferase concentration (safety and tolerability)24 hours after the baselineEffect of 2000 microgram vitamin D3 dose on in vivo changes in serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) concentrations
In vivo change from baseline in serum calcium concentration (safety and tolerability)24 hours after the baselineEffect of 2000 microgram vitamin D3 dose on in vivo changes in serum calcium concentrations

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026