Skip to content

Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss After Immediate Implant Placement in Maxillary Esthetic Zone With Nanobone Versus Xenograft

Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss After Immediate Implant Placement in Maxillary Esthetic Zone With Nanobone Versus Xenograft (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03536260
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-05-24
Start date
2017-07-01
Completion date
2018-06-30
Last updated
2018-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Implant Placement in Maxillary Esthetic Zone

Brief summary

Immediate implant placement has a success rate from 94-100 % . After tooth extraction there is a loss in the horizontal and vertical dimension by about 3-6 mm and 1-2 mm respectively and alveolar crest resorption of about 44% especially through 6 months after extraction. After immediate implant placement there is usually a void between the implant and the socket walls which is called jumping distance or gap which may heal spontaneously or need bone graft to bridge the space. If the gap is 1-2 mm it may heal spontaneously more than that this will need bone graft. There is no evidence that the graft impairs osseointegration Development of artificial bone has increasingly progressed in the last few years. Nanobone nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite embedded in a porous silica gel matrix bone graft is introduced which has osseoconductive and biomimetic properties .the sub-micron modification in the bone substitute will enhance osteogenic property. It bind to the bone by stimulation of osteoblast activity and enhance growth factors which improve bone healing and provide more strength and stability to the implant.

Interventions

DEVICEImplant with NanoBone graft

Using of NanoBone graft to fill the gap in the socket after immediate implant placement

DEVICEImplant with Xenograft

Using of Xenograft to fill the gap in the socket after immediate implant placement

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients with badly broken teeth in upper esthetic zone indicated for extraction, presence of at least 4 mm of bone beyond the root apex to guarantee implant primary stability, implant placement within the alveoli confines. * Both sexes. * No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology. * No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of fenestrations or dehiscence of the residual bony Walls after extraction. * Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day .(24) * Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing. * Psychiatric problems * Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia, or bone augmentation to implant site

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Measurement of Crestal Bone Loss in grafted socket3 months after implant placement

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026