Skip to content

A Phase I/II Study of KB103, a Topical HSV1-COL7, on DEB Patients

A Phase I/II Study of KB103, a Non-Integrating, Replication-Incompetent HSV Vector Expressing the Human Collagen VII Protein, for the Treatment of Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (DEB)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03536143
Acronym
GEM-1
Enrollment
12
Registered
2018-05-24
Start date
2018-05-06
Completion date
2019-11-01
Last updated
2023-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

Keywords

bullosa, DEB, RDEB, Krystal, epidermolysis, Beremagene, Geperpavec, KB103, HSV-COL7A1

Brief summary

This study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of topical Beremagene Geperpavec (KB103, HSV1-COL7) on DEB patients.

Detailed description

The primary objectives were the evaluation of safety, through incidence of adverse events associated with the administration of B-VEC as compared to placebo, as well as the demonstration of molecular correction of the disease by establishing the presence of functional COL7 expression and anchoring fibrils (AF) formation post administration of B-VEC. Additional primary objectives were to assess the proportion of wounds with complete wound closure (≥90% reduction from baseline wound surface area) at Week 8, 10, and 12, the duration of wound closure, and the time to wound closure of B-VEC treated wounds as compared with placebo treated wounds.

Interventions

Topical gel of non-integrating, replication-incompetent HSV-1 expressing the human collagen VII protein

BIOLOGICALPlacebo gel

Placebo gel

Sponsors

Krystal Biotech, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Intrasubject treatment assignment/randomization

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of the recessive form of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB). * Age 1. Phase 1: 18 years old or older, 2. Phase 2a: 5 years old or older, 3. Phase 2b: 2 years old or older, 4. Phase 2c: 2 years old or older. * Willing and able to give consent/assent * Confirmation of RDEB diagnosis by genetic testing, IF, and IEM * LH24 antibody negative (non-collagenous \[NC\] 2domain \[NC2-\]) and NC1 domain \[NC1+\]). (This criterion is applicable to the first 2 adults on the study (Phase 1). Subsequent subjects can be NC1+ or NC1-) * Confirmed RDEB COL7A1 mutations in subject * Wound that meets the wound size/surface area entry criteria: 1. Phase 1: Two wounds up to 10 cm2; 1 randomized to B-VEC and 1 randomized to placebo 2. Phase 2a and 2b: At least 3 wounds up to 20 cm2; 2 wounds randomized to B-VEC and 1 randomized to placebo 3. Phase 2c: At least 2 wounds up to 50 cm2; at least 1 randomized to B-VEC and 1 randomized to placebo * Subjects, who are, in the opinion of the investigator, able to understand the study, cooperate with the study procedures, and are willing to return to the clinic for all the required follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

* Medical instability limiting ability to travel to the investigative center * The presence of medical illness expected to complicate participation and/or compromise the safety of this technique, such as active infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B (as determined by hepatitis B surface antigen screening), or hepatitis C (as determined by detection of hepatitis C antibodies, or positive result of hepatitis C polymerase chain reaction \[PCR\] analysis) * Serum antibodies to COL7 demonstrated on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, Western blot, or cell-mediated immunity to enzyme-lined ImmunoSpot® (subjects with negative results within 12 months of screening are eligible) * Active infection in the area that will undergo administration * Evidence of systemic infection * Known allergy to any of the constituents of the product * Current evidence or a history of squamous cell carcinoma in the area that will undergo treatment * Active drug or alcohol addiction * Hypersensitivity to local anesthesia (lidocaine/prilocaine cream) * Receipt of chemical or biological study product for the specific treatment of RDEB in the past 3 months * Specific wounds that have previously been administered investigational gene or cell therapy * Subjects who have taken systemic antibiotics within 7 days * Positive pregnancy test or breast-feeding * Clinically significant abnormalities as determined by the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete Wound Closure Responder, ITT Populationfrom baseline at Weeks 8, 10, and 12One wound is a responder if the reduction from baseline in wound surface is ≥90%.
Number of Subjects Reported at Least One Adverse Event, Safety Populationbaseline to 12 weeksSafety assessments included evaluation of medical and medication history, physical / skin examination, vital signs, adverse events, and laboratory evaluations. Due to the 'split-person' intrasubject design, the safety assessments were reported at subject level, but not per intervention.
Number of Adverse Events Reported, Safety Populationbaseline to 12 weeksSafety assessments included evaluation of medical and medication history, physical / skin examination, vital signs, adverse events, and laboratory evaluations. Due to the 'split-person' intrasubject design, the safety assessments were reported at subject level, but not per intervention.
Time to Wound Closure Analysis, ITT Populationbaseline to complete wound closureTime to wound closure was defined as the time from the first treatment to Complete Wound Closure (≥90% reduction in wound surface area from baseline)
Duration of Wound Closure, ITT PopulationTime from the complete closure to the first reopening of the same woundDuration of wound closure

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants (Topical Beremagene Geperpavec (B-VEC), and Placebo)
The randomization scheme and subject-specific randomization envelopes were created for each phase of the study. At the baseline visit, subjects were assigned a randomization number and the investigator selected either 2 (Phase 1, B-VEC: Placebo = 1:1), 3 (Phase 2a and 2b, B-VEC: Placebo = 2:1), or 2 (Phase 2c, B-VEC: Placebo = 1:1) similar sized wounds, as applicable. Using the randomization scheme with the subject-specific envelope, the wounds were assigned to either B-VEC or placebo.
12
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyEarly termination, Sponsor decision1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants (Topical Beremagene Geperpavec (B-VEC), and Placebo)
Age, Continuous20.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.05
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity : Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity : Not Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race : White
12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Complete Wound Closure Responder, ITT Population

One wound is a responder if the reduction from baseline in wound surface is ≥90%.

Time frame: from baseline at Weeks 8, 10, and 12

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population: subjects who were administered KB103 who have had at least one paired assessment of the target wound area post-administration, i.e., at least one KB103 target wound and one placebo target wound.~The Safety population: all subjects who were administered IP. The per-protocol (PP) population: all subjects in the ITT population who have had at least one paired assessment of the target wound area post-administration and completed the protocol as planned.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All Participants (Topical Beremagene Geperpavec (B-VEC), and Placebo)Complete Wound Closure Responder, ITT PopulationWeek 814 number of responder
All Participants (Topical Beremagene Geperpavec (B-VEC), and Placebo)Complete Wound Closure Responder, ITT PopulationWeek 1012 number of responder
All Participants (Topical Beremagene Geperpavec (B-VEC), and Placebo)Complete Wound Closure Responder, ITT PopulationWeek 1212 number of responder
PlaceboComplete Wound Closure Responder, ITT PopulationWeek 80 number of responder
PlaceboComplete Wound Closure Responder, ITT PopulationWeek 102 number of responder
PlaceboComplete Wound Closure Responder, ITT PopulationWeek 121 number of responder
Primary

Duration of Wound Closure, ITT Population

Duration of wound closure

Time frame: Time from the complete closure to the first reopening of the same wound

Population: ITT population included all subjects who were administered IP and had at least 1 post dose paired wound assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
All Participants (Topical Beremagene Geperpavec (B-VEC), and Placebo)Duration of Wound Closure, ITT Population103.0 days
PlaceboDuration of Wound Closure, ITT Population16.5 days
p-value: 0.0009Log Rank
Primary

Number of Adverse Events Reported, Safety Population

Safety assessments included evaluation of medical and medication history, physical / skin examination, vital signs, adverse events, and laboratory evaluations. Due to the 'split-person' intrasubject design, the safety assessments were reported at subject level, but not per intervention.

Time frame: baseline to 12 weeks

Population: Safety population included all subjects administered B-VEC or Placebo. Due to the 'split-person' intrasubject design, the safety assessments were reported at subject level, but not per intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All Participants (Topical Beremagene Geperpavec (B-VEC), and Placebo)Number of Adverse Events Reported, Safety Population35 number of adverse events
Primary

Number of Subjects Reported at Least One Adverse Event, Safety Population

Safety assessments included evaluation of medical and medication history, physical / skin examination, vital signs, adverse events, and laboratory evaluations. Due to the 'split-person' intrasubject design, the safety assessments were reported at subject level, but not per intervention.

Time frame: baseline to 12 weeks

Population: Safety population included all subjects administered B-VEC or Placebo. Due to the 'split-person' intrasubject design, the safety assessments were reported at subject level, but not per intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All Participants (Topical Beremagene Geperpavec (B-VEC), and Placebo)Number of Subjects Reported at Least One Adverse Event, Safety Population9 Participants
Primary

Time to Wound Closure Analysis, ITT Population

Time to wound closure was defined as the time from the first treatment to Complete Wound Closure (≥90% reduction in wound surface area from baseline)

Time frame: baseline to complete wound closure

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) included all subjects who were administered IP and had at least 1 post dose paired wound assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
All Participants (Topical Beremagene Geperpavec (B-VEC), and Placebo)Time to Wound Closure Analysis, ITT Population13.5 days
PlaceboTime to Wound Closure Analysis, ITT Population22.5 days
p-value: 0.0216Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026