Skip to content

Comparison Between Electronic and Traditional Chest Drainage Systems

Multicenter Randomized Study on Comparison Between Electronic and Traditional Chest Drainage Systems

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03536130
Enrollment
382
Registered
2018-05-24
Start date
2017-04-04
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2019-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer

Keywords

chest tube, lung resection, air leakage

Brief summary

This study is designed to compare the electronic chest drainage system (Drentech Palm Evo) with the traditional system, both already in use in the clinical practice, in a cohort of patients who received thoracoscopic lobectomy. This study is not evaluating safety or efficacy of these systems. This study's primary aim is to determine if the use of a digital chest system compared with a traditional system reduce the duration of chest drainage and length of hospital stay. Moreover, the investigators aim to quantify the variability of results regarding the subjective observer evaluation of active air leaks (through the traditional system) compared with the objective data registered by the digital system. Finally the investigators want to evaluate whether it is possible through the digital device to distinguish an active air leak from a pleural space effect by the evaluation of intrapleural differential pressure and to identify potential predictors of prolonged air leaks.

Interventions

Patients in the intervention arm are connected to Drentech Palm Evo with single standard chest tube (28 Ch) immediately after closure of the chest. Patients with digital devices are managed by setting the pump to -20 cmH2O until the morning of postoperative day (POD) 1 and then setting the pump on physiologic mode (0 cmH2O) thereafter. Management of chest tube drainage and decision for chest tube removal will be dictated by clinical signs, symptoms and surgeon preference following standard clinical practice of general thoracic patients

Sponsors

Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
CollaboratorOTHER
Vito Fazzi Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Monaldi Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Padova
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Allocation: randomization 1 to 1 Endpoint classification: efficacy study Masking: Open label Intervention model: parallel assignment Primary purpose: supportive care

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Able and willing to read, understand and provide written informed consent * Patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy * Age 18 - 80 years * Gender: both * Estimated life expectancy of at least 6 months. * Tumour considered potentially resectable by R0 surgery * Adequate respiratory function for surgery. * Must have signed and dated an informed consent form (ICF), before performance of any study-specific procedures or tests. Subjects must be fully informed about their illness and the investigational nature of the study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients requiring ICU care with mechanical ventilation * Patients needing reintervention during postoperative care * Patients requiring a thoracotomy * Tumour considered potentially resectable by incomplete surgical resection with microscopic residual disease (R1) or gross residual disease (R2). * Evidence of extra-thoracic disease. * Major thoracic surgical procedure before enrolment. * Any other significant co-morbid condition that, in opinion of the investigator, would impair study participation or cooperation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Duration of chest drainagefrom date of surgery to date of chest tube removal, assessed up to 8 days
Post-operative hospital length of stayfrom date of surgery to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 8 days
Evaluation of the degree of concordance between the subjective observer evaluation of active air leaks compared with the objective data registered by the digital system in the patients with electronic chest drainage systemfrom date of surgery to date of chest tube removal, assessed up to 8 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluation of intrapleural differential pressure in case of active air leak and in case of pleural space effectfrom date of surgery to date of chest tube removal, assessed up to 8 days
Identification of potential predictors of prolonged air leaks through the analysis of the data registered by the digital systemfrom date of surgery to date of chest tube removal, assessed up to 8 days

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactGiuseppe Marulli, MD, PhD
giuseppe.marulli@unipd.it+39-0498212242
Backup ContactGiovanni Comacchio, MD
giovannimaria.comacchio@aopd.veneto.it+39-0498212242

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026