Skip to content

Adjunctive Ganglionated Plexus Ablation in Redo-Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Adjunctive GP Ablation In Redo-PVI: Paroxysmal Atrial Arrhythmias After Pulmonary Vein Isolation Are Driven By Ectopy-Triggering Left Atrial Ganglionated Plexus

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03535818
Acronym
ADD-GP
Enrollment
68
Registered
2018-05-24
Start date
2017-06-14
Completion date
2026-02-01
Last updated
2024-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

The investigator propose to test the efficacy of adjunctive ET-GP ablation in patients undergoing redo PVI for paroxysmal AF.

Detailed description

Patients with ongoing paroxysmal arrhythmias after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) get incrementally less benefit with redo-PVI. This implies non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers, which are more challenging to locate. The autonomic nervous system is implicated in the multifactorial pathogenesis of AF but few studies have attempted neural targeting as a therapeutic intervention. We have demonstrated that stimulation of specific left atrial ganglionated plexi (GPs) triggers both AF and atrial ectopy and importantly stimulation of these sites may not induce AV block, the 'conventional' marker used to locate GPs. Having shown that these ectopy-triggering GP (ET-GP) sites are anatomically stable and can be rendered inactive by either ablation at the site or by ablation between the site and the adjacent PV, a single centre study suggests that ET-GP ablation can prevent recurrent AF in some patients.

Interventions

PROCEDURERadiofrequency ablation

RF application to achieve complete pulmonary vein isolation +/- ganglionated plexus ablation

Sponsors

Imperial College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Intervention model description

Randomised, controlled, prospective study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Males or females eighteen (18) to eighty five (85) years old * Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation * Previous pulmonary vein isolation * Suitable candidate for catheter ablation * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to catheter ablation * Presence of a cardiac thrombus * Valvular disease that is grade moderate or greater * Any form of cardiomyopathy * On amiodarone therapy * Patients who lack capacity * Active gastrointestinal bleeding * Active infection or fever * Renal failure (Creatinine \>200µmol/L) * Life expectancy shorter than the duration of the trial * Bleeding or clotting disorders or inability to receive heparin * Pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Any atrial arrhythmia >30s documented on ECGs12 monthsAfter blanking period 3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Symptom recurrence requiring repeat ablations12 months
Complications12 months
Radiofrequency timeWithin ablation procedure

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026