Skip to content

Hemostasis With QuikClot® Radial® Pad Versus TR Band® After Transradial Artery Access

A Randomized Comparison of the QuikClot® Radial® Pad Versus the Standard of Care TR Band® on Hemostasis After Transradial Artery Access

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03535597
Enrollment
355
Registered
2018-05-24
Start date
2018-08-01
Completion date
2022-12-28
Last updated
2024-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Transradial Access, Hemostasis

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the QuikClot® Radial® pad on hemostasis after transradial access (TRA), compared to the standard of care TR Band®, to hopefully develop a safe and efficacious technique to achieve more rapid patent hemostasis after TRA, and improve patient care by optimizing radial hemostasis management.

Detailed description

The QuikClot® Radial® (QC) pad will be applied over the radial artery access site covered with either a Coban™ bandage or a Tegaderm™ dressing after TRA. Firm manual compression will then be applied over the QC pad after the sheath is removed for 5 minutes. The Coban™ cohort will then have the Coban™ bandage removed after an additional 25 minutes, then be covered with a Tegaderm™ dressing. The Tegaderm™ only cohort will be closely observed for 25 minutes after release of manual pressure. Both cohorts will remove the Tegaderm™ dressing the following morning. Consented subjects will be randomly assigned in the cardiac cath lab upon completion of their procedure into one of the following arms: Arm 1 - Standard of Care with a TR Band® Arm 2 - QC pad combined with a Coban™ bandage Arm 3 - QC pad combined with a Tegaderm™ dressing. This arm was stopped after the enrollment of 73 patients and replaced by the QC/TR Band® arm Arm 4- QC pad was applied on the radial arterial access site with 30 minutes of compression under a TR Band® inflated with 8-10 mL of air. Then the TR Band® was removed, leaving the QC pad covered with a Tegaderm™ dressing.

Interventions

DEVICEQuikclot Radial (QC) Pad

The QC pad will be applied over the radial artery access site covered with either a Coban™ bandage, a Tegaderm™ dressing, or a TR Band after TRA.

Sponsors

Z-Medica
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Memorial Healthcare System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized Controlled prospective study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization (CC) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via the radial artery as part of their standard of care treatment 2. Patients able and willing to give written informed consent 3. Patient \> 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients presenting with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) 2. Oral anticoagulation therapy as described below: 1. If on a DOAC (direct-acting oral anticoagulants - ie dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban), patients will be excluded if DOAC taken within 48 hours and eGFR \> 30 ml/min or DOAC taken within 72 hours and eGFR \< 30 ml/min. 2. If the patient is on warfarin, excluded if INR \> 1.5 3. Liver Failure 4. Life-threatening illness that the patient would not be expected to live more than 6 months post-procedure 5. Major unanticipated event in the cardiac cath lab (i.e. cardiac arrest) of an already consented patient, but before randomization, where the operator believes participation in this trial is now inappropriate. 6. Thrombocytopenia, with a platelet count of \< 75,000.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Initial Successful Hemostasis3 hoursInitial successful hemostasis is defined as no evidence of external bleeding from the TRA puncture site or expanding hematoma of the forearm after completion of the above described TR Band® and QuikClot® Radial® pad protocols, without the need for reinflation of air in the TR Band® or reapplication of manual pressure over the QuikClot® Radial® pad secured with either a Coban™ bandage or Tegaderm™ dressing, or use of manual compression over the arteriotomy site.
Total Time to Hemostasis3 hoursTotal time to hemostasis was calculated as the time needed from sheath removal to achieving complete hemostasis. All additional protocol-directed recompression and/or weaning times needed to obtain complete hemostasis were added to calculate the total time to hemostasis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radial Artery Occlusion (RAO)1 hourRAO will be assessed one hour after completed hemostasis, using the reverse Barbeau's test.
Forearm Hematoma (EASY Classification)3 hoursThe forearm hematoma development is defined according to the EASY (Early Discharge After Transradial Stenting of Coronary Arteries) classification.
Incidence of Pain/Numbness of the Forearm1 hourSelf-reported pain/numbness was evaluated using a verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS), ranging from 0 for no pain to 10 for the worst pain, one hour after hemostasis was obtained.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants ≥ 18 years of age willing to give written informed consent were randomized immediately after the completion of the procedure at the cath lab using the randomization sequence.

Pre-assignment details

Patients less than 18 years old, acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, pregnancy, inability to consent, inability or refusal to allow a follow-up visit or telephone call one business day after the procedure, and arterial access using an ulnar or femoral approach were excluded.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TR Band
Patients randomly assigned to this arm received 60 min of mechanical compression with a TR Band inflated with 10 mL of air, followed by gradual weaning over the subsequent 60 min. 96 patients who had undergone successful radial access were enrolled in this arm.
96
QC/Coban Bandage
Patients randomly assigned to this arm received the QC pad with 5 minutes of manual pressure followed by 25 minutes of light compression with a Coban™ bandage. 100 patients who had undergone successful radial access were enrolled in this arm.
100
QC/Trgaderm Dressing
Patients randomly assigned to this arm received the QC pad with 5 min of manual pressure followed by a Tegaderm™ dressing. 73 subjects who had undergone successful radial access were enrolled in this arm.
73
QC/TR Band
Patients were assigned to this arm received the QC pad under a TR Band with 30 minutes of compression by the inflated TR Band®. 86 patients who had undergone successful radial access were enrolled in this arm.
86
Total355

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTR BandQC/Coban BandageQC/Trgaderm DressingQC/TR BandTotal
Age, Continuous66.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3
65.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
67.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
64.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
Aspirin use88 Participants90 Participants71 Participants70 Participants319 Participants
BMI29.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
30.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3
29.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
30.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
29.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
Diabetes mellitus42 Participants40 Participants30 Participants32 Participants144 Participants
Dyslipidemia62 Participants71 Participants52 Participants59 Participants244 Participants
Family history of CAD1 Participants3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Hypertension80 Participants81 Participants62 Participants69 Participants292 Participants
Oral anticoagulant9 Participants12 Participants11 Participants7 Participants39 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants4 Participants1 Participants2 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
18 Participants17 Participants10 Participants13 Participants58 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
75 Participants79 Participants62 Participants67 Participants283 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants25 Participants19 Participants19 Participants89 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
70 Participants75 Participants54 Participants67 Participants266 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 960 / 1000 / 730 / 86
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 960 / 1000 / 730 / 86
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 960 / 1000 / 730 / 86

Outcome results

Primary

Initial Successful Hemostasis

Initial successful hemostasis is defined as no evidence of external bleeding from the TRA puncture site or expanding hematoma of the forearm after completion of the above described TR Band® and QuikClot® Radial® pad protocols, without the need for reinflation of air in the TR Band® or reapplication of manual pressure over the QuikClot® Radial® pad secured with either a Coban™ bandage or Tegaderm™ dressing, or use of manual compression over the arteriotomy site.

Time frame: 3 hours

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm 1Initial Successful Hemostasis85 Participants
Arm 2Initial Successful Hemostasis88 Participants
Arm 3Initial Successful Hemostasis51 Participants
Arm 4Initial Successful Hemostasis74 Participants
p-value: 0.90695% CI: [0.89, 1.11]Chi-squared
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.09, 1.53]Chi-squared
p-value: 0.61395% CI: [0.86, 1.09]Chi-squared
Primary

Total Time to Hemostasis

Total time to hemostasis was calculated as the time needed from sheath removal to achieving complete hemostasis. All additional protocol-directed recompression and/or weaning times needed to obtain complete hemostasis were added to calculate the total time to hemostasis.

Time frame: 3 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1Total Time to Hemostasis131.5 minutesStandard Deviation 29.8
Arm 2Total Time to Hemostasis33.3 minutesStandard Deviation 9.6
Arm 3Total Time to Hemostasis10.9 minutesStandard Deviation 20.4
Arm 4Total Time to Hemostasis37.2 minutesStandard Deviation 17.3
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Forearm Hematoma (EASY Classification)

The forearm hematoma development is defined according to the EASY (Early Discharge After Transradial Stenting of Coronary Arteries) classification.

Time frame: 3 hours

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm 1Forearm Hematoma (EASY Classification)6 Participants
Arm 2Forearm Hematoma (EASY Classification)9 Participants
Arm 3Forearm Hematoma (EASY Classification)5 Participants
Arm 4Forearm Hematoma (EASY Classification)8 Participants
p-value: 0.59495% CI: [0.56, 3.76]Fisher Exact
p-value: >0.99995% CI: [0.37, 3.26]Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.58195% CI: [0.55, 3.88]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Incidence of Pain/Numbness of the Forearm

Self-reported pain/numbness was evaluated using a verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS), ranging from 0 for no pain to 10 for the worst pain, one hour after hemostasis was obtained.

Time frame: 1 hour

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm 1Incidence of Pain/Numbness of the Forearm5 Participants
Arm 2Incidence of Pain/Numbness of the Forearm10 Participants
Arm 3Incidence of Pain/Numbness of the Forearm8 Participants
Arm 4Incidence of Pain/Numbness of the Forearm9 Participants
p-value: 0.28495% CI: [0.71, 5.22]Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.24395% CI: [0.75, 5.9]Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.26695% CI: [0.74, 5.54]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Radial Artery Occlusion (RAO)

RAO will be assessed one hour after completed hemostasis, using the reverse Barbeau's test.

Time frame: 1 hour

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm 1Radial Artery Occlusion (RAO)5 Participants
Arm 2Radial Artery Occlusion (RAO)4 Participants
Arm 3Radial Artery Occlusion (RAO)4 Participants
Arm 4Radial Artery Occlusion (RAO)3 Participants
p-value: 0.74495% CI: [0.23, 2.57]Fisher Exact
p-value: >0.99995% CI: [0.31, 3.41]Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.72495% CI: [0.18, 2.46]Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026