Skip to content

Evaluation of Periodontal Ligament Distraction Using a Modified Surgical Technique for Retraction of Maxillary Canines

Evaluation of Periodontal Ligament Distraction Using a Modified Surgical Technique for Retraction of Maxillary Canines in Adult Patients (Split-mouth Randomized Clinical Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03535285
Acronym
[PLD]
Enrollment
10
Registered
2018-05-24
Start date
2017-06-15
Completion date
2017-12-15
Last updated
2018-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthodontic Appliance Complication

Keywords

periodontal ligament, dentoalveolar, distraction, orthodontic

Brief summary

Surgical modification technique try to get bodily movement during upper canine retraction.

Detailed description

I- Original surgical technique (Liou and Huang technique, 1998) : On the conventional surgical side, (the control side), the intersepital bone was undermined by two vertical cuts on the mesio-buccal and mesio-palatal line angles of the first premolar socket. They were connected at the base of the socket by an oblique cut. The surgical round bur was held parallel to the long axis of the canine and moved buccolingually, while shaving the interseptal bone buccolingual (back-and-forth) shaving movements were reduced the thickness of the interseptal bone by approximately 1 mm II- Modified surgical technique: In the surgical modification side, (the experimental side), intra-alveolar mesio-buccal and mesio-palatal cuts and interseptal bone shaving were done by surgical round bur and copious irrigation, without the oblique cut since it was done blindly in the original surgical technique. A buccal semilunar flap was opened on the apical area of canine-premolar region. The surgical pin helped also in location of the point of initial drilling of the apical horizontal cut from buccal approach, when the surgical pin's socket arm rested on the depth of the socket, the vestibular arm marked the point of access. It also estimated mesiodeistal extension of the apical horizontal cut. The apical horizontal cut was started from the socket apex to half way of the interseptal bone mesiodistally as an extension and for the depth, Mallet and Chisel were used from the cortical bone to reach the mesio-palatal cut. The flap was sutured. This surgical modification step provided more predictability and safer surgery than the blind oblique cut in the original surgical technique.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPeriodontal ligament distraction

decrease the bony resistant during canine retration

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Split-mouth

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Orthodontic patients needed extraction of upper first premolars, with age range from 18 - 25 years old. 2. All patients were medically free. (See Appendix II) 3. No previous orthodontic treatment. 4. Adequate oral hygiene and periodontally healthy teeth. 5. The canines were almost leveled and aligned. 6. Maximum anchorage requirements. 7. Healthy canines; no deep carious lesions, no endodontic lesions, no root canal treatment, nor internal or external root resorption. 8. All patients were informed of the procedure and signed the consents.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tipping of the canines3-4 weeks1. Periapical radiograph using Parallel technique (X-ray sensor , X-ray sensor holder & Potable dental x-ray unit 2. Panoramic radiograph .
Rate of canines retraction3-4 weeksDigital models using 3shape scanner and Ortho-Analyzer software
Rotation of the canines3-4 weeksDigital models using 3shape scanner and Ortho-Analyzer software

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pulp Vitality3-4 weeksCold application (Ethyl Chloride)
Gingival index3-4 weeksPeriodontal probe
Amount of anchorage loss3-4 weeksDigital models using 3shape scanner and Ortho-Analyzer software
Pain3-4 weeksNumeric rating scale (NRS) for pain
Periodontal index3-4 weeksPeriodontal probe
Tipping of the molars3-4 weeks1. Periapical radiograph using Parallel technique (X-ray sensor , X-ray sensor holder & Potable dental x-ray unit 2. Panoramic radiograph.
The apical root resorption scores3-4 weeksPeriapical radiograph using Parallel technique (x-ray sensor, X-ray sensor holder & Potable dental x-ray unit

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026