Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Conditions
Keywords
periodontal ligament, dentoalveolar, distraction, orthodontic
Brief summary
Surgical modification technique try to get bodily movement during upper canine retraction.
Detailed description
I- Original surgical technique (Liou and Huang technique, 1998) : On the conventional surgical side, (the control side), the intersepital bone was undermined by two vertical cuts on the mesio-buccal and mesio-palatal line angles of the first premolar socket. They were connected at the base of the socket by an oblique cut. The surgical round bur was held parallel to the long axis of the canine and moved buccolingually, while shaving the interseptal bone buccolingual (back-and-forth) shaving movements were reduced the thickness of the interseptal bone by approximately 1 mm II- Modified surgical technique: In the surgical modification side, (the experimental side), intra-alveolar mesio-buccal and mesio-palatal cuts and interseptal bone shaving were done by surgical round bur and copious irrigation, without the oblique cut since it was done blindly in the original surgical technique. A buccal semilunar flap was opened on the apical area of canine-premolar region. The surgical pin helped also in location of the point of initial drilling of the apical horizontal cut from buccal approach, when the surgical pin's socket arm rested on the depth of the socket, the vestibular arm marked the point of access. It also estimated mesiodeistal extension of the apical horizontal cut. The apical horizontal cut was started from the socket apex to half way of the interseptal bone mesiodistally as an extension and for the depth, Mallet and Chisel were used from the cortical bone to reach the mesio-palatal cut. The flap was sutured. This surgical modification step provided more predictability and safer surgery than the blind oblique cut in the original surgical technique.
Interventions
decrease the bony resistant during canine retration
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Split-mouth
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Orthodontic patients needed extraction of upper first premolars, with age range from 18 - 25 years old. 2. All patients were medically free. (See Appendix II) 3. No previous orthodontic treatment. 4. Adequate oral hygiene and periodontally healthy teeth. 5. The canines were almost leveled and aligned. 6. Maximum anchorage requirements. 7. Healthy canines; no deep carious lesions, no endodontic lesions, no root canal treatment, nor internal or external root resorption. 8. All patients were informed of the procedure and signed the consents.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Tipping of the canines | 3-4 weeks | 1. Periapical radiograph using Parallel technique (X-ray sensor , X-ray sensor holder & Potable dental x-ray unit 2. Panoramic radiograph . |
| Rate of canines retraction | 3-4 weeks | Digital models using 3shape scanner and Ortho-Analyzer software |
| Rotation of the canines | 3-4 weeks | Digital models using 3shape scanner and Ortho-Analyzer software |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pulp Vitality | 3-4 weeks | Cold application (Ethyl Chloride) |
| Gingival index | 3-4 weeks | Periodontal probe |
| Amount of anchorage loss | 3-4 weeks | Digital models using 3shape scanner and Ortho-Analyzer software |
| Pain | 3-4 weeks | Numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain |
| Periodontal index | 3-4 weeks | Periodontal probe |
| Tipping of the molars | 3-4 weeks | 1. Periapical radiograph using Parallel technique (X-ray sensor , X-ray sensor holder & Potable dental x-ray unit 2. Panoramic radiograph. |
| The apical root resorption scores | 3-4 weeks | Periapical radiograph using Parallel technique (x-ray sensor, X-ray sensor holder & Potable dental x-ray unit |
Countries
Egypt