Skip to content

Accuracy of Computer Guided Versus Conventional Ridge Splitting of Horizontal Deficient in Maxillary Anterior Alveolar Ridge

Accuracy of Computer Guided Versus Conventional Ridge Splitting of Horizontal Deficient in Maxillary Anterior Alveolar Ridge (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03533309
Enrollment
14
Registered
2018-05-23
Start date
2018-07-01
Completion date
2019-10-30
Last updated
2018-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ridge Deficency

Keywords

horizontal defect, Anterior maxillary

Brief summary

In patient with horizontal deficiency in alveolar ridge of the anterior maxilla, Dose computer Guided stent enhance the accuracy and clinical outcome vs conventional ridge splitting surgery????

Detailed description

PICO P- Horizontal deficient alveolar ridge in Anterior Maxillary Region I- Computer guided surgical cutting guide C- Conventional alveolar ridge splitting O- Clinical outcome and radiographic outcomes Primary outcome: Accuracy In computer Guided: CBCT will performed pre-operative and post-operative for measure the difference of degree in superimposition after ridge splitting. In conventional method: Ridge mapping will applied in preoperative clinical evaluation, and measure in post-operative, the difference in splitting will calculate in millimeter (mm) Secondary outcome: Thickness of buccal cortical plate In both technique CBCT will performed and measuring the Both Buccal and palatal cortical bone in millimeter(mm)

Interventions

PROCEDUREComputer guided surgical cutting guide

comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using computer guided surgical cutting stent

PROCEDUREConventional alveolar ridge splitting

comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using conventional technique.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Partial edentulous in the aesthetic zone. * Patient with bucco-lingual bone width is 3 mm or greater but \< 6mm * Normal alveolar bone height * Adequate oral hygiene * Free of soft tissue or dental pathology * Patients accepting to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patient medically compromised. * Uncooperative patient. * Poor oral hygiene and periodontal disease. * Patients who smoked and pregnant women * Systemic disease directly affecting bone healing * Atrophic ridges (1.5 mm or less) * History of radiotherapy & treatment with bisphosphonates.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracyup to 4 monthsIn computer Guided: CBCT will performed pre-operative and post-operative for measure the difference of degree in superimposition after ridge splitting. In conventional method: Ridge mapping will applied in preoperative clinical evaluation, and measure in post-operative, the difference in splitting will calculate in millimeter (mm) In computer Guided: CBCT will performed pre-operative and post-operative for measure the difference of degree in superimposition after ridge splitting. In conventional method: Ridge mapping will applied in preoperative clinical evaluation, and measure in post-operative, the difference in splitting will calculate in millimeter (mm)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Thickness of buccal cortical plateup to 4 monthsIn both technique CBCT will performed and measuring the Both Buccal and palatal cortical bone in millimeter(mm)

Contacts

Primary Contactabdelrahman akram aburass, master
abdalrahman.aburas@dentistry.cu.edu.eg00201288769226
Backup Contactniveen asker
niveen.asker@dentistry.cu.edu.eg00201001558769

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026