Skip to content

A Study of the Response to AG-86893 in Patients With Pterygium Hyperemia

A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Masked, Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Topical AG-86893 in Patients With Pterygium

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03533244
Acronym
SURPH
Enrollment
64
Registered
2018-05-23
Start date
2018-10-11
Completion date
2019-10-25
Last updated
2020-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pterygium

Keywords

Hyperemia

Brief summary

A pterygium is a wing-shaped, benign tissue growth which forms on the surface of the conjunctiva and grows towards the cornea. It can eventually lead to vision impairment. The precise cause of pterygium formation is unknown but new blood vessel growth and fibroblastic structures are characteristics of the disease. AG-86893 is an eye drop being developed to treat hyperemia (redness) and growth of the pterygium. Hypothesis 1. AG-86893 dosed three times daily for 28 consecutive days has an acceptable safety profile as measured by the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) compared with vehicle 2. At least 1 concentration of AG-86893 is effective, as measured by the mean change from baseline in conjunctival hyperemia (redness), compared with vehicle

Interventions

DRUG0.1% AG-86893 Eye Drops

One drop, three times daily to the study eye for 28 days

DRUG0.3% AG-86893 Eye Drops

One drop, three times daily to the study eye for 28 days

One drop, three times daily to the study eye for 28 days

Sponsors

Allgenesis Biotherapeutics Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Good health with no clinically significant findings based on the medical history, electrocardiogram, vital signs, blood chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis findings, as determined by the investigator * Females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at baseline and must be on established, adequate contraception and males must use condoms if their partner is of childbearing potential and their female partner should also use an additional effective means of contraception, or they must agree to abstain from sexual intercourse with a female partner for the duration of the study; contraception should be continued for 3 months after the last dose. * Presence of pterygium with associated conjunctival hyperemia (redness) of grade ≥2 as assessed by a central reading center.

Exclusion criteria

* History or presence of any ocular diseases other than pterygium or its sequelae (after-effects), including neoplasia (uncontrolled overgrowth) * Diagnosis of ocular hypertension or glaucoma requiring use of intraocular pressure-lowering medication * Use of contact lenses during the study in the study eye * History or evidence of ocular surgeries in the study eye at any time * History of liver dysfunction or current abnormal liver enzymes * Pregnancy, plans for pregnancy, or breastfeeding during the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Overall Conjunctival Hyperemia ScoreBaseline and Day 28Assessed by digital ocular photography; each quadrant of the eye (superior, inferior, nasal, temporal) will be scored using a 5-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = very severe) and graded by a reading center. The overall conjunctival score is the average of the four quadrants. Assessments are made by subtracting the score at Baseline from the score on Day 28. An increase in value indicates worsening of hyperemia, while a decrease indicates improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Hyperemia Score in the Quadrant With the PterygiumBaseline and Day 28Assessed by digital ocular photography; the quadrant with the pterygium will be scored using a 5-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = very severe) and graded by a reading center. Assessments are made by subtracting the score at Baseline from the score on Day 28. An increase in value indicates worsening of hyperemia, while a decrease indicates improvement.

Countries

Australia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Vehicle Eye Drops
One drop, three times daily to the study eye for 28 days Vehicle Eye Drops: One drop, three times daily to the study eye for 28 days
20
0.1% AG-86893 Eye Drops
One drop, three times daily to the study eye for 28 days 0.1% AG-86893 Eye Drops: One drop, three times daily to the study eye for 28 days
22
0.3% AG-86893 Eye Drops
One drop, three times daily to the study eye for 28 days 0.3% AG-86893 Eye Drops: One drop, three times daily to the study eye for 28 days
22
Total64

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVehicle Eye DropsTotal0.3% AG-86893 Eye Drops0.1% AG-86893 Eye Drops
Age, Continuous49.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
51.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
49.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
54.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants58 Participants19 Participants21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
20 Participants64 Participants22 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants26 Participants11 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants38 Participants11 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 220 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 205 / 2215 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 220 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Overall Conjunctival Hyperemia Score

Assessed by digital ocular photography; each quadrant of the eye (superior, inferior, nasal, temporal) will be scored using a 5-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = very severe) and graded by a reading center. The overall conjunctival score is the average of the four quadrants. Assessments are made by subtracting the score at Baseline from the score on Day 28. An increase in value indicates worsening of hyperemia, while a decrease indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 28

Population: modified intent-to-treat (mITT)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Vehicle Eye DropsChange From Baseline in Overall Conjunctival Hyperemia Score-0.056 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
0.1% AG-86893 Eye DropsChange From Baseline in Overall Conjunctival Hyperemia Score-0.330 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.109
0.3% AG-86893 Eye DropsChange From Baseline in Overall Conjunctival Hyperemia Score-0.352 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.109
Comparison: An empirical sample size estimation was used as this was an exploratory study. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between AG-86893 and AG-86893 Vehicle. It is expected that the active group is at least 50% better than the vehicle.p-value: 0.218Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.29Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Hyperemia Score in the Quadrant With the Pterygium

Assessed by digital ocular photography; the quadrant with the pterygium will be scored using a 5-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = very severe) and graded by a reading center. Assessments are made by subtracting the score at Baseline from the score on Day 28. An increase in value indicates worsening of hyperemia, while a decrease indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 28

Population: Per protocol (PP)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Vehicle Eye DropsChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Hyperemia Score in the Quadrant With the Pterygium-0.111 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.153
0.1% AG-86893 Eye DropsChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Hyperemia Score in the Quadrant With the Pterygium-0.429 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.142
0.3% AG-86893 Eye DropsChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Hyperemia Score in the Quadrant With the Pterygium-0.500 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.138
p-value: 0.193Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.399Mixed Models Analysis
Post Hoc

Percent of Patients With a 1-point Decrease in Hyperemia Score in the Quadrant With the Pterygium

Assessed by digital ocular photography; the quadrant with the pterygium will be scored using a 5-point scale and graded by a reading center. A 1-point reduction in hyperemia score is considered clinically meaningful.

Time frame: Day 28

Population: Per protocol (PP)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Vehicle Eye DropsPercent of Patients With a 1-point Decrease in Hyperemia Score in the Quadrant With the Pterygium3 Participants
0.1% AG-86893 Eye DropsPercent of Patients With a 1-point Decrease in Hyperemia Score in the Quadrant With the Pterygium11 Participants
0.3% AG-86893 Eye DropsPercent of Patients With a 1-point Decrease in Hyperemia Score in the Quadrant With the Pterygium12 Participants
p-value: 0.015Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.022Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026