Skip to content

Results of Gamma Nail in Trochentric Fractures of the Adults

Results of Gamma Nail in Trochentric Fractures of the Adults

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03531983
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-05-22
Start date
2019-06-01
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2019-01-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Trochanteric Fractures

Keywords

gamma nail

Brief summary

We prospectively reviewed the results of 30 patients who had undergone intramedullary fixation with a gamma nail for femur trochentric fractures in AUH. within 1 year

Detailed description

Hip fractures are considered one of the major health problems in aging societies . These fractures are correlated with increased disability and mortality and a decreased quality of life . Early mobilization of patients with these fractures is essential to improve fracture healing, minimize immediate postsurgical morbidity, and reduce care costs. One essential prerequisite for early mobilization is mechanically stable fracture fixation . Nowadays, most hip fractures are treated by extramedullary or intramedullary implants, which allow a stable fixation in the majority of cases A dynamic hip screw (DHS) is the most commonly used implant for intertrochanteric fractures . Load bearing in the proximal femur is predominantly through the intact calcar femoral; the lever arm of the laterally placed plate is increased, thus, there is a risk of implant cutout if the calcar is not intact . Biomechanically, compared with a laterally fixed side plate, an intramedullary device decreases the bending force of the hip joint on the implant by 25-30%. This has advantages especially in elderly patients, in whom the primary treatment goal is immediate full weight-bearing mobilization. It has been postulated that cephalomedullary nails have an advantage over DHS fixation because of the load-bearing axis being closer to the hip joint fulcrum, and also less blood loss, minimal tissue dissection, shorter operation time, and faster ambulation after surgery . However, other studies have reported that fixation with DHS is better . One of the major drawbacks discovered with the use of the gamma nail is a higher reoperation rate as a result of new fracture around the implant . In this study, we present our results for the treatment of trochentric fractures using a gamma nail in terms of the outcome, drawbacks, and possible complications.

Interventions

PROCEDUREfixation of tochentric fractures by gamma nail

• Thirty patients with recent traumatic extracapsular proximal femoral fractures were treated using a short gamma nail of third-generation assembly

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Age (20-70) * unstable trochentric fractures

Exclusion criteria

* pathological fractures due to neoplasia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with failure of initial intervention1 yearcase series prospective study for 30 patients who were admitted to AUH during 18-month period from December 2018 to May 2019

Contacts

Primary Contactahmed G helmy
ahmedhelmo2@gmail.com01111858288

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026