Skip to content

Use of Dynamic Arm Supports to Promote Activities of Daily Living in Individuals With DMD

Use of Dynamic Arm Support Devices for Upper Limb Function in Non-Ambulatory Men With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03531788
Enrollment
18
Registered
2018-05-22
Start date
2018-08-30
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2022-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Keywords

dynamic arm support, mobile arm support, rehabilitation, occupational therapy

Brief summary

This study is a longitudinal, randomized control trial evaluating the use of two commercially available dynamic arm support devices (1) Armon Ayura-Kinova and 2) JAECO WREX) to promote participation in activities of daily living (ADLs) in non-ambulatory individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) with upper extremity weakness.

Detailed description

This study is a longitudinal, randomized control trial evaluating the use of two commercially available dynamic arm support devices (1) Armon Ayura-Kinova and 2) JAECO WREX) to promote participation in activities of daily living (ADLs) in non-ambulatory individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) with upper extremity weakness. Up to 30 individuals will be enrolled to participate in this research study, which includes a two-week baseline data collection period, a four-week device trial and a two-week post device data collection period. Participants will be randomly assigned to trial one of the dynamic arm support devices during the four week in-home trial. The ActiGraph GT9x (name of device), a wrist worn activity monitoring device, will be worn during the baseline period, the device trial and the post device data collection period to capture upper extremity (UE) movement patterns. UE performance will be further quantified with use of a physical motor assessment, the Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) assessment and patient reported outcomes. Data gleaned will provide important knowledge and objective results regarding the potential benefit of dynamic arm supports in individuals with DMD with limited functional use of their upper extremities.

Interventions

DEVICEArmon Ayura (Kinova)

Actively assisted mechanical arm support (electric powered to balance arm)

DEVICEJAECO Wrex

Passive mechanical arm support (elastic bands to balance arm)

Sponsors

Roxanna Marie Bendixen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned to trial a dynamic arm support (Armon Ayura (Kinova) or JAECO WREX)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
14 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 14 years of age or older 2. Self-report diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) 3. Use a wheelchair for mobility 4. Score 3-5 on the Brooke Upper Extremity (UE) Scale 5. Self-report of needs assistance/unable to achieve independently on at least 10 items on the Upper Limb Activities of Daily Living (UL ADL) self-report questionnaire 6. Able to follow instructions 7. Informed consent provided by self (18 and over) or by parent or legal guardian (if under the age of 18)

Exclusion criteria

1. Does not have minimum level of UE function to operate the assigned dynamic arm support (Score of 6 on the Brooke UE scale or any other impairment limiting use) 2. The assigned dynamic arm support is unable to be mounted to wheelchair (mounts will vary based on manufacturer/model of wheelchair)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Upper Extremity Activity Counts (Movement) Through ActigraphyCollection of activity counts through the ActiGraph GT9x occurred during testing phase with and without the upper extremity arm device.Measured through the ActiGraph GT9X wrist worn activity monitoring device: The multi-axis activity monitor measures activity counts that represent movement of the upper extremity. We calculated the average activity counts during testing items with the arm device and testing items without the arm device. We then calculated change scores (average activity counts without the device minus average activity counts with the device). Higher activity counts indicate more effort and more movement during item testing without the device compared to using the device.
Change in Upper Extremity Position Through ActigraphyCollection of activity counts through the ActiGraph GT9x occurs from baseline through the end of the 4-week device trial.Measured through the ActiGraph GT9X wrist worn activity monitoring device: The multi-axis activity monitor (gyroscope within the monitor) measures activity counts (movement) per second in the x, y, and z planes. Change in average activity counts (movement) in x, y, and z planes during the 4-week trial period compared to the 2-week baseline period are reported (higher activity counts means more movement during trial). X plane is horizontal movement, y plane is vertical movement, and z plane extends outward from the body.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)The GAS is completed and scored at baseline and at the end of the 4 week trial with and without the device.The GAS is a personal interview which allows the individual to determine important and personally meaningful goals. Each participant chose three individualized goals to work on and assess at the end of the study. Goal scaling is standardized in order to calculate the extent to which a patient's goals are met.The GAS uses a 5-point rating scale to determine if the goal was not met (-2) up to a greater than expected meeting of the personal goal (+2). A score of 0 indicates the goal was met as anticipated. We report the average change in the score of each goal when the participant uses the trial device. Here we use change scores which range from 0 (performed the same with and without the device) to 4 (participant performed at a greater than expected level with the device).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Armon Ayura (Kinova)
Participants will trial the Armon Ayura dynamic arm support. Armon Ayura (Kinova): Actively assisted mechanical arm support (electric powered to balance arm)
12
JAECO WREX
Participants will trial the JAECO Wilmington Robotic EXoskeleton (WREX) dynamic arm support. JAECO Wrex: Passive mechanical arm support (elastic bands to balance arm)
6
Total18

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArmon Ayura (Kinova)JAECO WREXTotal
Actigraphy (wrist worn activity monitor)534.02 activity counts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 321.35
235.80 activity counts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 150.51
444.55 activity counts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 307.62
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Age, Continuous18.10 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.32
18.22 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
18.16 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.82
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants6 Participants18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants6 Participants17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants6 participants18 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants6 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Upper Extremity Activity Counts (Movement) Through Actigraphy

Measured through the ActiGraph GT9X wrist worn activity monitoring device: The multi-axis activity monitor measures activity counts that represent movement of the upper extremity. We calculated the average activity counts during testing items with the arm device and testing items without the arm device. We then calculated change scores (average activity counts without the device minus average activity counts with the device). Higher activity counts indicate more effort and more movement during item testing without the device compared to using the device.

Time frame: Collection of activity counts through the ActiGraph GT9x occurred during testing phase with and without the upper extremity arm device.

Population: All participants who had completed the testing period while wearing the Actigraph GT9x are reported. All participants were tested, but data are missing due to technology failure or not wearing the ActiGraph during testing. Participants who were not wearing the ActiGraph during testing are not reported. Comparisons between groups (Kinova and WREX) were not analyzed due to small sample sizes in both groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armon Ayura (Kinova)Change in Upper Extremity Activity Counts (Movement) Through Actigraphy270.61 Activity CountsStandard Deviation 375.5
JAECO WREXChange in Upper Extremity Activity Counts (Movement) Through Actigraphy26.75 Activity CountsStandard Deviation 123.04
Comparison: Activity counts from the ActiGraph GT9x activity monitor provide data per participant during testing of upper extremity activities/tasks and were collected while wearing the device (Kinova and WREX) and without the device (Kinova and WREX). For each upper extremity task, we summed all activity count data for all tasks completed. We then computed means and standard deviations. Data presented are within group data change and not between group data comparisons.
Primary

Change in Upper Extremity Position Through Actigraphy

Measured through the ActiGraph GT9X wrist worn activity monitoring device: The multi-axis activity monitor (gyroscope within the monitor) measures activity counts (movement) per second in the x, y, and z planes. Change in average activity counts (movement) in x, y, and z planes during the 4-week trial period compared to the 2-week baseline period are reported (higher activity counts means more movement during trial). X plane is horizontal movement, y plane is vertical movement, and z plane extends outward from the body.

Time frame: Collection of activity counts through the ActiGraph GT9x occurs from baseline through the end of the 4-week device trial.

Population: All participants who completed the testing period while wearing the Actigraph are reported. Comparisons between groups (Kinova and WREX) were not analyzed due to small sample sizes in both groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armon Ayura (Kinova)Change in Upper Extremity Position Through ActigraphyAverage x axis change score19838.12 Activity CountsStandard Deviation 41880.09
Armon Ayura (Kinova)Change in Upper Extremity Position Through ActigraphyAverage y axis change score69125.26 Activity CountsStandard Deviation 102942.92
Armon Ayura (Kinova)Change in Upper Extremity Position Through ActigraphyAverage z axis change score59784.84 Activity CountsStandard Deviation 91039.7
JAECO WREXChange in Upper Extremity Position Through ActigraphyAverage x axis change score44697.80 Activity CountsStandard Deviation 89132.49
JAECO WREXChange in Upper Extremity Position Through ActigraphyAverage y axis change score1279.76 Activity CountsStandard Deviation 141962.15
JAECO WREXChange in Upper Extremity Position Through ActigraphyAverage z axis change score17297.11 Activity CountsStandard Deviation 130688.29
Comparison: Activity counts from the ActiGraph GT9x activity monitor were collected during baseline (without a device) and throughout the 4 week device trial (with the device). For each time period, activity count data were averaged across the day. We then compared the baseline time period to the device trial period to understand the difference in movement and upper extremity positioning during the device trial. Data presented are within group change scores and not between group data comparisons.
Secondary

Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)

The GAS is a personal interview which allows the individual to determine important and personally meaningful goals. Each participant chose three individualized goals to work on and assess at the end of the study. Goal scaling is standardized in order to calculate the extent to which a patient's goals are met.The GAS uses a 5-point rating scale to determine if the goal was not met (-2) up to a greater than expected meeting of the personal goal (+2). A score of 0 indicates the goal was met as anticipated. We report the average change in the score of each goal when the participant uses the trial device. Here we use change scores which range from 0 (performed the same with and without the device) to 4 (participant performed at a greater than expected level with the device).

Time frame: The GAS is completed and scored at baseline and at the end of the 4 week trial with and without the device.

Population: Participants were included in this analysis if they completed the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) with and without the use of the arm device (Kinova or WREX). Sample sizes were too small to use statistical analyses for comparisons between groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Armon Ayura (Kinova)Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)Goal 13.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Armon Ayura (Kinova)Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)Goal 22.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Armon Ayura (Kinova)Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)Goal 33.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
JAECO WREXGoal Attainment Scale (GAS)Goal 13.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
JAECO WREXGoal Attainment Scale (GAS)Goal 22.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
JAECO WREXGoal Attainment Scale (GAS)Goal 33.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Comparison: Three goals were identified for each participant and scored without using an arm support device to serve as a baseline measure of abilities. These scores were compared to the scores achieved on the same goals using the arm support device.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026