Skip to content

Feasibility of a Web-based Patient Reported Outcome Symptom Monitoring Application in Danish Lung Cancer Patients

Feasibility of a Web-based Patient Reported Outcome Symptom Monitoring Application in Danish Lung Cancer Patients - a Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03529851
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-05-18
Start date
2018-05-01
Completion date
2018-08-01
Last updated
2018-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer Stage IV

Keywords

Patient reported outcomes, Symptom monitoring, Follow-up

Brief summary

The trial is a pilot study prior to a following phase III trial and is designed to test the feasibility, acceptability and technical usability of supplementary web-based follow-up in lung cancer via a patient-reported outcome application.

Detailed description

This pilot study will test if the use of AmbuFlex (a generic on-line system for self-recorded patient reported outcomes) is feasible for a following randomized trial (PRO-WIDE trial - Patient Reported Outcomes used for Weekly Internet-based DEtection of progressive disease in lung cancer; a randomized controlled trial). The RCT (randomized controlled trial) will test if weekly supplementary internet-based self-monitoring of 12 core symptoms can increase survival in Danish lung cancer patients during follow-up or maintenance treatment. A threshold mechanism will automatically send an alert to the hospital in case of alarming symptoms and the patient will be contacted by the clinicians. In the pilot study, initial interviews with 7-10 patients will explore possible missing items and conceptual issues in the questionnaire. Based on the results an adjustment of the questionnaire will be considered. Then the system including the alert trigger mechanism will be tested on 20 patients in medical antineoplastic treatment for three consecutive weeks. Acceptability, usability and relevance will be evaluated by a questionnaire at the end of the study period. Inclusion-rate, number of alerts per completed questionnaire and time usage of alert-management will be registered. For final evaluation, interviews with two nurses and two doctors will be made at the end of the study.

Interventions

In case of alarming symptoms reported in the questionnaire, an alert is automatically sent to the hospital. The clinicians will contact the patient, confirm the symptoms and intervene according to standard practice.

Sponsors

Danish Cancer Society
CollaboratorOTHER
Danish Lung Cancer Group
CollaboratorOTHER
Regional Hospital West Jutland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Feasibility pilot study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Stage IV lung cancer in palliative treatment with 3 weeks treatment intervals and next planned attendance at the hospital after 3 weeks. 2. Access to internet connection 3. Performance status ≤ 2 4. Patient has given his/her written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Persons deprived of liberty or under guardianship or curators 2. Dementia, mental alteration or psychiatric disease that can compromise informed consent from the patient and / or adherence to the protocol and the monitoring of the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Techincal feasibility, acceptability and usability of the PRO system for patients3 weeksMeasured by an evaluation questionnaire at the end of the pilot study categorized according to the specified topics with 5 response items for each question. All responses will be presented in a comprehensive chart.
Inclusion rate3 weeksNumber of included patients per screened patients Reasons for non-participation
Time usage per day on approval and handling alerts3 weeksMinutes spent per alert Minutes spent per telephone call
Barriers for implementation of the PRO system according to the clinical staff3 weeksIdentified through interviews with 2 nurses and 2 MDs after the study period
Exploration of possible missing items and conceptual issues in the questionnaire.3 weeksIdentified through interviews with 7-10 patients prior to the pilot study.
Alert-rate3 weeksNumber of alerts sent to the hospital per questionnaires completed

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026