Endoscopic Ultrasonography
Conditions
Keywords
Contrast endosonograpy
Brief summary
A prospective study designed to show the superiority of contrast guided echoendoscopy versus conventional echoendoscopy
Detailed description
A prospective study that compares the results using FNA contrast echoendoscopy versus standard FNA echoendoscopy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumors
Interventions
Puncture of the pancreatic solid mass with fine needle aspiration under endoscopic ultrasonographic control. Passage in the same pancreatic mass of first using standard FNA method then contrast enhanced FNA method or vice versa according to the randomization
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* solid pancreatic tumor lesions
Exclusion criteria
* severe coagulopathy of trombocytopenia \<50.000 * patients refuse for biopsy prelevation or pacient's refuse to participate in the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS FNA endosonography versus standard FNA endosonography in the etiological cyto histological of pancreatic solid tumors using histology core as comparison between the two methods | an average of 2 years | Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS FNA endosonography versus standard FNA endosonography in the etiological cyto histological of pancreatic solid tumors using histology core as comparison between the two methods |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison between standand endosonography and contrast enhanced endosonography in obtaining a superior quality in obtaining histology core | day one | Visual analogic scale |
| Quality of histological specimen(histology core) obtained with the two types of FNA biopsies (contrast enhanced and standard) | 5 days | Visual analogic scale |
| Dysfunction in the two types of biopsies | day one | failure or difficulty reports with each procedure (%) |
Countries
Romania