Iron Deficiency Anemia
Conditions
Keywords
Iron Deficiency Anemia, Fe-ASP, Casein, Iron protein acetyl aspartate, Restoration of decreased hemoglobin, Ferrous sulfate
Brief summary
The scope of this study is to compare the efficacy of the new oral formulation of Fe-ASP to oral ferrous sulfate in patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) for the restoration of decreased circulating Hb. The improvement of symptoms of anemia, the restoration of biomarkers of iron deficiency into the normal range and the incidence of GI tract side effects are the study secondary endpoints.
Detailed description
Anemia is a major problem in the general population affecting 5.6% in the United States. Iron deficiency is the most common cause of anemia. Although traditionally considered to be mainly a problem of underdeveloped countries, a recent epidemiological survey reported high incidence of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in Europe in 2011. The incidence rate measured per 1,000 person-years was 8.18 in Belgium, 8.93 in Italy, 12.42 in Germany and 14.14 in Spain. Women were affected four-times more than men. The major causes of IDA are chronic blood loss, chronic disorders and excess needs. The cornerstones of management of IDA are recognition and management of the cause of iron loss and efficient iron supplementation. Iron supplementation is usually done through oral formulations of iron. Three oral iron preparations are broadly used: ferrous sulfate, ferrous gluconate, and ferrous fumarate. The usual dosage is 325 mg (corresponding to 65 mg of elemental iron) two times a day. One major limitation with oral iron supplementation is GI side effects observed in almost 40% of cases. These are gastric discomfort, nausea, vomiting and constipation and they are caused due to the oxidation of ferrous irons in the stomach by acidic gastric fluid into insoluble salts. A new formulation of iron conjugated to one N-acetyl-aspartate derivative of casein (Fe-ASP) has recently been developed. Due to the casein coating, it is anticipated that iron is converted to a smaller extent in the stomach into insoluble salts. In this way, more iron reaches the duodenum to become absorbed whereas GI side effects are less often. In parallel, animal studies have shown that casein itself primes the expression of enzymes that facilitate the absorption of iron across the duodenal mucosa. This formulation is anticipated to be better tolerated for oral ingestion since iron is readily absorbed in the duodenum. The aim is to compare the efficacy of the new oral formulation of Fe-ASP to oral ferrous sulfate in patients with IDA for the restoration of decreased circulating Hb.
Interventions
DRUGFerrous Sulfate
Blisters of 10 capsules containing 150 mg of ferrous sulfate.
DRUGFe-ASP
Boxes of 10 vials of 15 ml containing 800 mg of Iron protein acetyl aspartate.
Sponsors
Attikon Hospital
Amalia Fleming Prefecture General Hospital of Melissia
G.Gennimatas General Hospital
Uni-Pharma Kleon Tsetis Pharmaceutical Laboratories S.A.
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)
Masking description
Double blind
Intervention model description
Double-dummy, blind, randomized, phase IV clinical trial
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female * Age equal to or more than 18 years * Written informed consent provided by the patient * Hb below 10g/dl, as defined by other trials * Absolute red blood cell (RBC) count below 4.5 x 106/mm3 for men or 4.0 x 106/mm3 for women * Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) of RBCs below 80 fl * Mean corpuscular Hb (MCH) of RBCs below 27 pg * Total ferritin below 30 ng/ml; this criterion is associated with sensitivity more than 99% for iron deficiency * In the case of patients with anemia after GI tract hemorrhage, inclusion criteria 6 and 7 DO NOT apply for study inclusion.
Exclusion criteria
* Age below 18 years * Denial to provide written informed consent * Acute myelogenous or lymphoblastic leukemia * Multiple myeloma * Primary or secondary myelodysplastic syndrome * Planning for start of chemotherapy within the first 30 days after inclusion in the trial * Planning for start of radiotherapy within the first 30 days after inclusion in the trial * Intake of erythropoietin * Planning for start of erythropoietin within the first 30 days after inclusion in the trial * Intake of chemotherapy the last six months * Intake of radiotherapy the last six months * Known hemochromatosis * Known celiac disease * Liver cirrhosis of Child-Pugh stage II or III * Any active overt bleeding * Pregnancy or lactation
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparative increase of baseline Hb | 4 weeks | The primary study endpoint is the comparative increase of baseline Hb in each study group after the first 4 weeks of treatment. Since the daily amount of elemental iron delivered with the ferrous sulfate regimen is 94 mg and with the Fe-ASP regimen 80 mg, the increase of baseline Hb will be adjusted per mg of delivered elemental iron. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Ferritin levels | 4 weeks and 12 weeks | Differences between the two groups of treatment in ferritin levels. |
| Absolute reticulocyte count | 1 week, 4 weeks and 12 weeks | Differences between the two groups of treatment in absolute reticulocyte count. |
| Absolute RBC count, Hb, MCV and MCH | 4 weeks and 12 weeks | Differences between the two groups of treatment in absolute RBC count, Hb, MCV and MCH. |
| Normalization of Hb | 4 weeks and 12 weeks | Differences between the two groups of treatment in normalization of Hb; this is defined as Hb≥13 g/dl for mean and ≥12 g/dl for women. |
| Physical findings of IDA | 4 weeks and 12 weeks | Differences between the two groups of treatment in change of physical findings of IDA. |
| Incidence of GI side effects | 4 weeks and 12 weeks | Differences between the two groups of treatment in the incidence of GI side effects. |
| Fatigue symptoms of IDA | 4 weeks and 12 weeks | Differences between the two groups of treatment in change of the fatigue symptoms of IDA. |
Countries
Greece
Outcome results
None listed