Skip to content

Pre-emptive Analgesics in Orthodontic Treatment

Effects of Pre-emptive Use of Combined Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen on Pain Control in Orthodontic Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03523988
Enrollment
73
Registered
2018-05-14
Start date
2017-05-02
Completion date
2017-08-01
Last updated
2019-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

NSAID, Pain Management

Keywords

Pre-emptive analgesics, Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen

Brief summary

This study is designed to determine if the preemptive use of a combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen is more effective in reducing pain following orthodontic tooth movement when compared to the use of acetaminophen and ibuprofen alone.

Detailed description

This study is designed to determine if the preemptive use of a combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen is more effective in reducing pain following orthodontic tooth movement when compared to the use of acetaminophen and ibuprofen alone. Before their orthodontic appointment, participants will be administered acetaminophen (650mg), ibuprofen (400mg), or acetaminophen (650mg) + ibuprofen (400mg). Participants will be asked to record their pain intensity using a numerical (0-10) visual analog scale (VAS) during rest, light biting, and while chewing paraffin wax during the following time intervals: immediately following drug administration, 6 hours after, the morning after, and the second morning after orthodontic treatment.

Interventions

DRUGAcetaminophen

Acetaminophen gel capsule

DRUGIbuprofen

Ibuprofen gel capsule

Sponsors

University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

The medications were prepared by the Kelley-Ross Compounding Group (Seattle, WA) and were identical in appearance. The bottles were labeled as A, B, or C and the identity of the medications were not revealed until after the data analysis was completed.

Intervention model description

Patients of the University of Washington Graduate Orthodontics Clinic

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

-Orthodontic patient presenting for orthodontic treatment

Exclusion criteria

* History of taking an analgesic in the past six hours * Hypersensitivity to ibuprofen or acetaminophen * Aspirin-sensitive asthma * Renal or liver impairment * History of GI bleeding or ulcers * Cardiovascular disease, recent myocardial infarction, heart failure, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery * Currently taking antibiotics or other medications for a chronic systemic disease * Bleeding disorder * Pregnant or nursing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 6 Hours After Treatment6 hours after orthodontic treatmentPain scores were measured and recorded by selecting a number \[0-10\] using a visual analog scale to assess pain during the following actions: jaw at rest, lightly biting, and chewing paraffin wax. The VAS consisted of a 10cm numerical scale from 0, representing no pain, to 10, representing worst possible, unbearable, excruciating pain.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 1 Day After Treatment1 day after orthodontic treatmentPain scores were measured and recorded by selecting a number \[0-10\] using a visual analog scale to assess pain during the following actions: jaw at rest, lightly biting, and chewing paraffin wax. The VAS consisted of a 10cm numerical scale from 0, representing no pain, to 10, representing worst possible, unbearable, excruciating pain.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 2 Days After Treatment2 days after orthodontic treatmentPain scores were measured and recorded by selecting a number \[0-10\] using a visual analog scale to assess pain during the following actions: jaw at rest, lightly biting, and chewing paraffin wax. The VAS consisted of a 10cm numerical scale from 0, representing no pain, to 10, representing worst possible, unbearable, excruciating pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Orthodontic patients that presented to the University of Washington Graduate Orthodontics Clinic between May 2nd and June 23rd, 2017 were approached for recruitment.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were screened against a set of inclusion criteria during the informed consent process. If one or more of the inclusion were not met then the patient was not assigned to a group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Acetaminophen
Acetaminophen 650mg powder in gel capsule taken by mouth before entering appointment Acetaminophen: Acetaminophen gel capsule
7
Ibuprofen
Ibuprofen 400mg powder in gel capsule taken by mouth before entering appointment Ibuprofen: Ibuprofen gel capsule
8
Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen
Acetaminophen 650mg and Ibuprofen 400mg powder in gel capsule taken by mouth before entering appointment Acetaminophen: Acetaminophen gel capsule Ibuprofen: Ibuprofen gel capsule
7
Total22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAcetaminophenIbuprofenAcetaminophen and IbuprofenTotal
Age, Continuous21.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
25.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18
21.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3
23.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 participants8 participants7 participants22 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 240 / 240 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 240 / 241 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 240 / 240 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 1 Day After Treatment

Pain scores were measured and recorded by selecting a number \[0-10\] using a visual analog scale to assess pain during the following actions: jaw at rest, lightly biting, and chewing paraffin wax. The VAS consisted of a 10cm numerical scale from 0, representing no pain, to 10, representing worst possible, unbearable, excruciating pain.

Time frame: 1 day after orthodontic treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AcetaminophenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 1 Day After TreatmentBiting2.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
AcetaminophenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 1 Day After TreatmentRest1.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
AcetaminophenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 1 Day After TreatmentChewing3.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 1 Day After TreatmentBiting2.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 1 Day After TreatmentRest2.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 1 Day After TreatmentChewing3.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Acetaminophen and IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 1 Day After TreatmentRest1.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Acetaminophen and IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 1 Day After TreatmentChewing2.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Acetaminophen and IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 1 Day After TreatmentBiting2.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
p-value: 0.65ANOVA
p-value: 0.82ANOVA
p-value: 0.69ANOVA
Primary

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 2 Days After Treatment

Pain scores were measured and recorded by selecting a number \[0-10\] using a visual analog scale to assess pain during the following actions: jaw at rest, lightly biting, and chewing paraffin wax. The VAS consisted of a 10cm numerical scale from 0, representing no pain, to 10, representing worst possible, unbearable, excruciating pain.

Time frame: 2 days after orthodontic treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AcetaminophenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 2 Days After TreatmentBiting2.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
AcetaminophenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 2 Days After TreatmentRest1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
AcetaminophenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 2 Days After TreatmentChewing2.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 2 Days After TreatmentBiting2.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 2 Days After TreatmentRest1.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 2 Days After TreatmentChewing3.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Acetaminophen and IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 2 Days After TreatmentRest0.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Acetaminophen and IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 2 Days After TreatmentChewing1.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Acetaminophen and IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 2 Days After TreatmentBiting0.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
p-value: 0.53ANOVA
p-value: 0.31ANOVA
p-value: 0.37ANOVA
Primary

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 6 Hours After Treatment

Pain scores were measured and recorded by selecting a number \[0-10\] using a visual analog scale to assess pain during the following actions: jaw at rest, lightly biting, and chewing paraffin wax. The VAS consisted of a 10cm numerical scale from 0, representing no pain, to 10, representing worst possible, unbearable, excruciating pain.

Time frame: 6 hours after orthodontic treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AcetaminophenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 6 Hours After TreatmentBiting2.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
AcetaminophenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 6 Hours After TreatmentRest0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
AcetaminophenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 6 Hours After TreatmentChewing2.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 6 Hours After TreatmentBiting2.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 6 Hours After TreatmentRest2.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 6 Hours After TreatmentChewing4.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Acetaminophen and IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 6 Hours After TreatmentRest1.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Acetaminophen and IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 6 Hours After TreatmentChewing3.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Acetaminophen and IbuprofenVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 6 Hours After TreatmentBiting2.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
p-value: 0.04ANOVA
p-value: 0.63ANOVA
p-value: 0.41ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026