Skip to content

OnabotulinumtoxinA Bladder Injection Study

Is Less More? Does Decreasing OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection Sites in the Bladder Increase Patient Satisfaction While Maintaining Efficacy?

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03523091
Enrollment
6
Registered
2018-05-14
Start date
2018-08-08
Completion date
2020-09-01
Last updated
2022-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overactive Bladder, Overactive Bladder Syndrome, Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Urinary Frequency/Urgency, Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Urgency

Keywords

OnabotulinumtoxinA, Bladder Injections

Brief summary

Patients with overactive bladder (OAB) will be randomly assigned (like a flip of a coin) to receive 100 units of onabotulinumtoxinA injected into the bladder at either 3 sites or 10 sites. Patient satisfaction and the effectiveness of the medication will be evaluated.

Detailed description

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition which often has a negative impact on health related quality of life. Primary and secondary treatments include behavior modification, pelvic floor physical therapy, and OAB medications. OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTX) is a well-established third line therapy for refractory OAB. BTX has transitioned over the years from a procedure conducted in the operating room to one that is commonly done in the clinic or physician office. While ten injection sites is commonly practiced, there has been continuing interest in reducing the number of injection sites to make the technique more tolerable and more efficient. In this study, refractory OAB patients will be randomized to receive 100 units of BTX over 3 or 10 injection sites. The investigators hypothesize that decreasing the number of injection sites may improve patient tolerability and satisfaction with this office-based procedure and potentially reduce the rates of adverse events including hematuria and urinary tract infection.

Interventions

DRUGOnabotulinumtoxinA 100Unit Injection

Initial treatment with the option of repeat injections every 3 months

Sponsors

Corewell Health East
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

2 arm parallel study with 1 to 1 randomization

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women and men, 18 years of age or older * Self-reported failed conservative care of behavioral modifications and/or oral medications for the treatment of OAB * Average urinary frequency of \> 8 voids per day as recorded on initial 3-day voiding diary * Self-reported bladder symptoms \> 3 months * Discontinued antimuscarinics/beta-3 agonists for \> 2 weeks prior to study enrollment. May restart antimuscarinics/beta-3 agonists if indicated \> 6 weeks after Botox injections. * Capable of giving informed consent * Capable and willing to follow all study-related procedures * Previous OnabotulinumtoxinA injection at least three months prior to study enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during study duration * Diagnosis of neurogenic bladder with the exception of highly functioning stroke patients * If a patient has had a previous neuromodulation device placed, it will have to be turned off for 2 weeks for a washout period and remain off throughout the study * Previous non-responders to onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX) therapy * Patient cannot be receiving percutaneous nerve stimulation (PTNS) therapy. If patient is receiving PTNS, they need to stop for 1 month prior to entering the study. * Refusal to self-catheterize or have indwelling catheter in the event of urinary retention * Use of investigational drug/device therapy within past 4 weeks * Participation in any clinical investigation involving or impacting gynecologic, urinary or renal function within past 4 weeks * Current or past history of any physical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, might put the subject at risk or interfere with study results interpretation * Pelvic radiation treatment * Known hypersensitivity to OnabotulinumtoxinA. * Previous infection at OnabotulinumtoxinA injection site.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Incontinence Episodes Per Day3 months after the initial injectionParticipants will be asked to complete a 3-day voiding diary. On the diary participants will record the number of occurrences of voids over a 24 hour period for 3 consecutive days. Number of voids at 3 months are recorded.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Severity of Urine Leakage3 months after the initial injectionPer the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF). This validated questionnaire provides a measure to assess the impact of symptoms of incontinence on quality of life and outcome of treatment. Question items include frequency of urinary incontinence, amount of leakage, overall impact of urinary incontinence, and a self-diagnostic item. Scoring is between 0-21 with greater values indicating increased severity.
Change in Overactive Bladder Symptoms3 months after the initial injectionPer the Global Response Assessment (GRA). Participants will assess overall how their OAB symptoms/condition changed since starting the study. Participants will select, Markedly worse (1), Moderately worse (2), Mildly worse (3), Same (unchanged) (4), Slightly improved (5), Moderately improved (6), or Markedly improved (7). Scores are from 1-7 with a greater score indicating a greater improvement of symptoms. Numbers of participants reporting each assessment will be reported.
Degree of Bladder Symptom Bother3 months after the initial injectionPer the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Short Form (OABq-SF). This validated measure evaluates overactive bladder symptom severity and health related quality of life. For each question, participants will answer how bothered they are by their urinary symptoms from not at all (1), a little bit (2), somewhat (3), quite a bit (4), a great deal (5), and a very great deal (5). Each question will be scored. Scores range from 19-114. The higher the score the greater perceived degree of bladder symptom bother.
Overall Voiding Symptoms at 3 Months3 months after the initial injectionPer the 3-day voiding diary. Participants will be asked to complete a 3-day voiding diary. On the diary participants will record the number of occurrences of voids, urge and stress incontinence episodes over a 24 hour period for 3 consecutive days.
Safety of Bladder InjectionsAt study completion, 3 months after the initial injectionFrequency and severity of study-related adverse events
Overall Patient Pain Tolerability With TreatmentAfter the initial injectionPer the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Participants will record the amount of pain of performing the treatment on a Visual Analog Scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Visual analog scores will be gathered at the end of the injection visit.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
3 Injection Sites
OnabotulinumtoxinA 100Unit injection into 3 sites throughout the bladder OnabotulinumtoxinA 100Unit Injection: Initial treatment with the option of repeat injections every 3 months
1
10 Injection Sites
OnabotulinumtoxinA 100Unit injection into 10 sites throughout the bladder OnabotulinumtoxinA 100Unit Injection: Initial treatment with the option of repeat injections every 3 months
5
Total6

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyIncrease Botox dose01
Overall StudyLower dose due to elevated post void residual (PVR)10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject03

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic3 Injection Sites10 Injection SitesTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Baseline number of stress incontinence episodes0 Stress incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
0.2 Stress incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
0.17 Stress incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
Baseline number of urge incontinence episodes21 Urge incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
20.6 Urge incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
20.7 Urge incontinence episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Baseline number of voids14 Voids
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
14.9 Voids
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.02
14.8 Voids
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
Baseline severity of urine leakage16 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
15 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
15.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
Baseline Symptom Bother64 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
87.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
83.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1 participants5 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 10 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Incontinence Episodes Per Day

Participants will be asked to complete a 3-day voiding diary. On the diary participants will record the number of occurrences of voids over a 24 hour period for 3 consecutive days. Number of voids at 3 months are recorded.

Time frame: 3 months after the initial injection

Population: Due to the small number of participants statistical analysis was limited. 3 participants completed 3 month diary data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
3 Injection SitesNumber of Incontinence Episodes Per Day0 Incontinency episodesStandard Deviation 0
10 Injection SitesNumber of Incontinence Episodes Per Day15.5 Incontinency episodesStandard Deviation 21.9
Secondary

Change in Overactive Bladder Symptoms

Per the Global Response Assessment (GRA). Participants will assess overall how their OAB symptoms/condition changed since starting the study. Participants will select, Markedly worse (1), Moderately worse (2), Mildly worse (3), Same (unchanged) (4), Slightly improved (5), Moderately improved (6), or Markedly improved (7). Scores are from 1-7 with a greater score indicating a greater improvement of symptoms. Numbers of participants reporting each assessment will be reported.

Time frame: 3 months after the initial injection

Population: Due to a small number of participants data analysis was limited. 3 participants completed GRA data at 3 months.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
3 Injection SitesChange in Overactive Bladder SymptomsSlightly Improved0 Participants
3 Injection SitesChange in Overactive Bladder SymptomsSlightly Worse0 Participants
3 Injection SitesChange in Overactive Bladder SymptomsModerately Improved0 Participants
3 Injection SitesChange in Overactive Bladder SymptomsModerately Worse0 Participants
3 Injection SitesChange in Overactive Bladder SymptomsNo change0 Participants
3 Injection SitesChange in Overactive Bladder SymptomsMarkedly Worse0 Participants
3 Injection SitesChange in Overactive Bladder SymptomsMarkedly Improved1 Participants
10 Injection SitesChange in Overactive Bladder SymptomsMarkedly Worse0 Participants
10 Injection SitesChange in Overactive Bladder SymptomsMarkedly Improved0 Participants
10 Injection SitesChange in Overactive Bladder SymptomsModerately Improved0 Participants
10 Injection SitesChange in Overactive Bladder SymptomsSlightly Improved1 Participants
10 Injection SitesChange in Overactive Bladder SymptomsNo change0 Participants
10 Injection SitesChange in Overactive Bladder SymptomsSlightly Worse1 Participants
10 Injection SitesChange in Overactive Bladder SymptomsModerately Worse0 Participants
Secondary

Degree of Bladder Symptom Bother

Per the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Short Form (OABq-SF). This validated measure evaluates overactive bladder symptom severity and health related quality of life. For each question, participants will answer how bothered they are by their urinary symptoms from not at all (1), a little bit (2), somewhat (3), quite a bit (4), a great deal (5), and a very great deal (5). Each question will be scored. Scores range from 19-114. The higher the score the greater perceived degree of bladder symptom bother.

Time frame: 3 months after the initial injection

Population: Due to the small number of participants data analysis was limited. 3 participants completed data at 3 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
3 Injection SitesDegree of Bladder Symptom Bother23 score on scaleStandard Error 0
10 Injection SitesDegree of Bladder Symptom Bother43 score on scaleStandard Error 26.9
Secondary

Overall Patient Pain Tolerability With Treatment

Per the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Participants will record the amount of pain of performing the treatment on a Visual Analog Scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Visual analog scores will be gathered at the end of the injection visit.

Time frame: After the initial injection

Population: 6 subjects completed baseline VAS scores.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
3 Injection SitesOverall Patient Pain Tolerability With Treatment2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
10 Injection SitesOverall Patient Pain Tolerability With Treatment3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Overall Voiding Symptoms at 3 Months

Per the 3-day voiding diary. Participants will be asked to complete a 3-day voiding diary. On the diary participants will record the number of occurrences of voids, urge and stress incontinence episodes over a 24 hour period for 3 consecutive days.

Time frame: 3 months after the initial injection

Population: Due to small number of participants data analysis was limited. 3 subjects had data available for 3 month timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
3 Injection SitesOverall Voiding Symptoms at 3 MonthsAverage number of voids12.6 EpisodesStandard Error 0
3 Injection SitesOverall Voiding Symptoms at 3 MonthsUrge incontinence episodes0 EpisodesStandard Error 0
3 Injection SitesOverall Voiding Symptoms at 3 MonthsStress incontinence episodes0 EpisodesStandard Error 0
10 Injection SitesOverall Voiding Symptoms at 3 MonthsAverage number of voids13.2 EpisodesStandard Error 2.6
10 Injection SitesOverall Voiding Symptoms at 3 MonthsUrge incontinence episodes11 EpisodesStandard Error 15.6
10 Injection SitesOverall Voiding Symptoms at 3 MonthsStress incontinence episodes1.5 EpisodesStandard Error 2.1
Secondary

Safety of Bladder Injections

Frequency and severity of study-related adverse events

Time frame: At study completion, 3 months after the initial injection

Population: 3 participants completed the study through the 3 month visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
3 Injection SitesSafety of Bladder InjectionsPost-void residual over 300 ml, severity mild1 Participants
3 Injection SitesSafety of Bladder InjectionsUrinary tract infection, severity mild1 Participants
10 Injection SitesSafety of Bladder InjectionsPost-void residual over 300 ml, severity mild0 Participants
10 Injection SitesSafety of Bladder InjectionsUrinary tract infection, severity mild0 Participants
Secondary

Severity of Urine Leakage

Per the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF). This validated questionnaire provides a measure to assess the impact of symptoms of incontinence on quality of life and outcome of treatment. Question items include frequency of urinary incontinence, amount of leakage, overall impact of urinary incontinence, and a self-diagnostic item. Scoring is between 0-21 with greater values indicating increased severity.

Time frame: 3 months after the initial injection

Population: Due to small number of participants data analysis was limited. 3 participants had data at 3 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
3 Injection SitesSeverity of Urine Leakage3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
10 Injection SitesSeverity of Urine Leakage7.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026