Skip to content

Enuresis Alarm - Is a Manual Trigger System Beneficial?

Enuresis Alarm - Is a Manual Trigger System Beneficial?

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03522818
Enrollment
200
Registered
2018-05-11
Start date
2018-03-09
Completion date
2023-09-12
Last updated
2021-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Enuresis, Nocturnal

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the bedwetting alarm trigger activated by parents to wake their child, in addition to the moisture alarm, will improve treatment success compared to the moisture alarm alone.

Detailed description

Nocturnal enuresis is a common issue in children, and use of bedwetting alarms has shown the best long-term success. However, use of alarms is very time-intensive, often taking months before yielding results. Researchers in the division of pediatric urology are initiating a randomized controlled study comparing a standard bedwetting alarm with a newly developed technology, with the hope that the new alarm will result in better, more rapid, and easier treatment for bedwetting. Children between the ages of 5 to 15 years old who have issues with bedwetting after successful toilet training may qualify for the study. Participants must first be evaluated by a pediatric urology specialist.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALManual Trigger

Will use the alarm as provided by the manufacture but parent has to manual trigger the alarm 1-2 hours after the child falls asleep.

BEHAVIORALNormal

Will use the alarm as provided by the manufacture.

Sponsors

PottyMD
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Gina Lockwood
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* children ages 5-15 years * Diagnosis of Primary Monosymptomatic Nocturnal Enuresis * \>2 wet nights per week * Score of 7 or below on questions 1-6 and 9-13 on Vancouver Dysfunctional Elimination Questionnaire * Patients/parents compliance in recording data \> 50% of nights

Exclusion criteria

* Known comorbid conditions: daytime incontinence, anatomic abnormalities (hydronephrosis, VUR), recurrent urinary tract infection, dysuria, neurogenic bladder, developmental delay, encopresis, diabetes insipidus, previous history of urologic surgery * Concomitant DDAVP use, anticholinergic use, B3 agonist use

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate the change and % reduction in mean number wet nights/week (>90%, 50-89%, <50%) of patients with treatment success with use of a manual trigger + moisture alarm vs. moisture alarm onlyone yearBladder Diary (Participant self-reported)

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactGina M Lockwood, MD, MS
gina-lockwood@uiowa.edu(319) 353-8673

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026