Osteoarthritis, Knee
Conditions
Brief summary
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is the principal surgical alternative to the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with end-stage unicompartmental tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The current comparative randomized study aims to evaluate the fixation of cemented and cementless designs of GMK-UNI unicompartmental knee prosthesis over a 5-year time period.
Detailed description
The Primary objective is to compare the quality of fixation of cemented and cementless designs of GMK-UNI unicompartmental knee replacement at 2 years of follow-up. The Secondary objectives include the evaluation of the patient improvement (subjective and objective) using the new Knee Society Score (KSS); the patient's anterior pain following UKA and any eventual patella-femoral disorder; Implant survival rate using the Kaplan Meier analysis; Post-op radiological findings and Adverse Events. The Primary outcome aims to compare the occurrence of radiolucency's lines (both partial and complete) between the two study groups. Secondary outcomes include New KSS, OKS, Kaplan Meier analysis and stability and fixation of UNI prosthesis. All patients who meet the inclusion criteria to take part in the current clinical study will be invited to participate before the surgery. Subjects will be randomized during the screening; half of them will receive the cemented GMK-UNI anatomical UKA and the other half the cementless GMK-UNI anatomical UKA. Clinical data will be recorded on CRF at those time-points: * Before the surgery * During the surgery * After the surgery at 3 months, 1, 2, 3 and 5 years.
Interventions
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) is a less invasive treatment option compared to Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) for patients with primary anteromedial knee osteoarthritis.
Sponsors
Medacta International SA
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with end-stage unicompartmental tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee that meet the indications for use according to Medacta implants included in this study (on-label use); * Those suffering from unilateral osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis of the medial compartment; * Frontal deformity \< 10° (evaluated on weight-bearing long-axis x-rays); * Flexion contracture \< 10°; * Intact ligaments; * Patients who are willing and able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study. Written informed consent must be obtained prior to the patient's surgery; * Patient's age over 18 years old; * Patient with BMI \< 40 kg/m2; * Patients must be willing to comply with the pre and post-operative evaluation schedule.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with one or more medical conditions identified as a contraindication defined by the labelling on any Medacta implants used in this study; * Any patient who cannot or will not provide informed consent for participation in the study; * Patients who need to undergo lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; * Patients who need a revision surgery; * Patients who need a patella-femoral joint prosthesis; * Patients who had previously undergone high tibial osteotomy or ACL reconstruction; * Patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2; * Patients unable to understand and take action; * Any case not described in the inclusion criteria; * Patients aged under 18 years;
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparing the occurrence of radiolucency's lines | 5 yrs | Compare occurrence of radiolucency's lines (both partial and complete)between the two study groups |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Implant survival rate using Kaplan Meier analysis | 5 yrs | Implant survival rate |
| Recording of adverse events | Throughout the study | Any complication occurred during the study |
| Anterior Knee Pian Scale (Kujala score) | pre-op; 3months;1,2,3,5 yrs | It's a 13-item knee specific self-report questionnaire. It documents response to 6 activities associated with anterior knee pain as well as symptoms such as limp, inability to weight bear through the affected limp, swelling...). It asks about duration of symptoms and limbs affected. Max score is 100 and lower scores indicate greater pain/disability. Scoring is hierarchical using various types of categorisation including no difficulty-unable and no pain-severe pain. It is easy to understand and takes few minutes to complete.It has a good test-retest reliability. |
| New Knee Society Score | Pre-op:3months;1,2,3,5 yrs | The new KSS System is a validated and responsive method for assessing objective and subjective outcomes after total and partial knee arthroplasty.It includes versions to be admninstered pre-op and post-op.It has an initial assessment of demographic deatils. The objective knee score includes VAS score of pain walking on level ground and on stairs or inclines, as well as ROM, an assessment of alignment, ligament stability along with deductions for flexion contracture or extensor lag. Pts then record their satisfaction, functional activities and expectations. It consists of 4 subscales: 1) objective knee score (7 items;100 points); 2) Satisfaction Score (5 items; 40 points);3) Expectation Score (3 items; 15 points); 4) Functional Activity Score (19 items; 100 points) |
| Stability and fixation of unicompartmental prosthesis | 5 yrs | To evaluate the stability and fixation of the prosthesis |
| Oxford Knee Score | Pre-op;3month;1,2,3,5yrs | The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12-item patient-reported PRO specifically designed and developed to assess function and pain after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery (arthroplasty).Each question is scored from 1 to 5, with 1 representing best outcome/least symptoms. Scores from each question are added so the overall score is from 12 to 60 (12 being the best outcome). The overall score for the OKS is acquired by simply summing the scores received for individual questions. |
Countries
France, Switzerland
Outcome results
None listed