Skip to content

Acetaminophen Versus IV Hydromorphone for Pain in the Elderly in the ED

An ED-based Randomized Trial of IV Acetaminophen Versus IV Hydromorphone for Elderly Adults With Acute Severe Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03521102
Enrollment
162
Registered
2018-05-11
Start date
2018-08-20
Completion date
2022-03-23
Last updated
2023-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Pain

Brief summary

Intravenous opioids are the mainstay of acute, severe pain treatment in Emergency Departments (ED) across the country. Acetaminophen, given orally, has also been used for treatment of mild to moderate pain. The more potent intravenous (IV) form of acetaminophen has been widely used in Europe for more than 20 years as post-surgical analgesia and received full FDA approval in the USA in 2010. As part of a continuing set of studies whose goal is to optimize treatment of pain among elderly ED patients, this randomized study will compare efficacy and safety of IV acetaminophen to IV hydromorphone.

Interventions

DRUGAcetaminophen 1000mg IV

1000mg of IV acetaminophen in 100ml of normal saline, administered as an intravenous drip over 10 minutes + 2ml of normal saline, administered as a slow intravenous push

DRUGHydromorphone 0.5 mg IV

100ml of normal saline, administered as an intravenous drip over 10 minutes, + 0.5mg of IV hydromorphone in 2ml of normal saline, administered as a slow intravenous push

Sponsors

Montefiore Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age equal to 65 or greater 2. Pain onset within 7 days with severe pain 3. Has capacity to provide informed consent 4. Understanding English or Spanish

Exclusion criteria

1. Use of tramadol or opioids within 7 days 2. Use of acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications within 8 hours 3. Chronic pain syndrome: daily pain for \> 3 months. Sickle cell anemia, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, and peripheral neuropathies 4. Conditions which may affect acetaminophen or opioid metabolism such as cirrhosis (Child Pugh A or worse), kidney impairment (CKD 3 or worse), active hepatic disease or severe dehydration 5. Alcohol intoxication 6. Systolic blood pressure: \< 100 mmHg 7. Heart rate: \< 60 beats per minute 8. Oxygen saturation: \< 95% on room air 9. Use of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors in the past 30 days 10. Use of transdermal pain patch or oral opioid \> 10 days in the prior month 11. Prior enrollment in the same study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Improvement in NRS Pain Score60 minutes following administration of medicationPain improvement was assessed using an NRS (numeric rating scale) to assess pain on a range of 0-10. Participants were asked to verbalize intensity of pain on the scale with zero meaning no pain and 10 meaning the worst pain imaginable. Pain was assessed at baseline and 60 minutes later to determine if clinically important improvement in pain was achieved. Clinically important improvement in pain was defined as an improvement of \>=1.3 points on the 0-10 scale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for Rescue Medication120 minutes following administration of medicationNumber of participants who required additional analgesic medication for the treatment of pain at any time during their ED course.
Improvement in NPS Pain Score by >=50%60 minutes after administration of medicationThe number of patients who minimally achieved a 50% improvement in NPS pain score from 0 to 60 minutes.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Enrollment began in August 2018, paused between March and June 2020, and concluded in October 2021. A total of 2,363 patients were screened for participation of which 162 were enrolled from two urban emergency departments in Bronx, NY.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Acetaminophen 1000mg IV
Acetaminophen 1000mg IV: 1000mg of IV acetaminophen in 100ml of normal saline, administered as an intravenous drip over 10 minutes + 2ml of normal saline, administered as a slow intravenous push.
81
Hydromorphone 0.5mg IV
Hydromorphone 0.5 mg IV: 100ml of normal saline, administered as an intravenous drip over 10 minutes, + 0.5mg of IV hydromorphone in solution with 2mL of normal saline, administered as a slow intravenous push.
81
Total162

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAcetaminophen 1000mg IVHydromorphone 0.5mg IVTotal
Age, Continuous75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Age, Customized
60-69 years old
23 Participants22 Participants45 Participants
Age, Customized
70-79 years old
40 Participants45 Participants85 Participants
Age, Customized
80-89 years old
12 Participants14 Participants26 Participants
Age, Customized
>=90 years old
6 Participants0 Participants6 Participants
Duration of Pain2 Minutes2 Minutes2 Minutes
Location of Pain
Abdomen/Flank/Pelvis
52 Participants55 Participants107 Participants
Location of Pain
Back/Neck
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Location of Pain
Chest
1 Participants6 Participants7 Participants
Location of Pain
Extremity
21 Participants11 Participants32 Participants
Location of Pain
Head
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Location of Pain
Widespread
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
NRS Pain Score (0-10)10 score on a scale10 score on a scale10 score on a scale
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
81 participants81 participants162 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
56 Participants51 Participants107 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants30 Participants55 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 810 / 81
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 8110 / 81
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 810 / 81

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Improvement in NRS Pain Score

Pain improvement was assessed using an NRS (numeric rating scale) to assess pain on a range of 0-10. Participants were asked to verbalize intensity of pain on the scale with zero meaning no pain and 10 meaning the worst pain imaginable. Pain was assessed at baseline and 60 minutes later to determine if clinically important improvement in pain was achieved. Clinically important improvement in pain was defined as an improvement of \>=1.3 points on the 0-10 scale.

Time frame: 60 minutes following administration of medication

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Acetaminophen 1000mg IVClinical Improvement in NRS Pain Score62 Participants
Hydromorphone 0.5mg IVClinical Improvement in NRS Pain Score63 Participants
Secondary

Improvement in NPS Pain Score by >=50%

The number of patients who minimally achieved a 50% improvement in NPS pain score from 0 to 60 minutes.

Time frame: 60 minutes after administration of medication

Population: Study participants did not receive any additional medication before the assessment of the primary outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Acetaminophen 1000mg IVImprovement in NPS Pain Score by >=50%30 Participants
Hydromorphone 0.5mg IVImprovement in NPS Pain Score by >=50%43 Participants
Secondary

Need for Rescue Medication

Number of participants who required additional analgesic medication for the treatment of pain at any time during their ED course.

Time frame: 120 minutes following administration of medication

Population: Study participants did not receive any additional medication before the assessment of the primary outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Acetaminophen 1000mg IVNeed for Rescue Medication37 Participants
Hydromorphone 0.5mg IVNeed for Rescue Medication31 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026