Skip to content

Study of Durvalumab Given With Chemoradiation Therapy in Patients With Unresectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Multi-center, International Study of Durvalumab Given Concurrently With Platinum-based Chemoradiation Therapy in Patients With Locally Advanced, Unresectable NSCLC (Stage III) (PACIFIC2)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03519971
Enrollment
328
Registered
2018-05-09
Start date
2018-03-29
Completion date
2026-03-09
Last updated
2026-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

Locally Advanced, Unresectable NSCLC, Carcinoma, NSCLC

Brief summary

This is a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, international study assessing the efficacy and safety of durvalumab given concurrently with platinum-based CRT (durvalumab + standard of care \[SoC\] CRT) in patients with locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC (Stage III).

Interventions

DRUGDurvalumab

Durvalumab IV (intravenous infusion)

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo IV (intravenous infusion)

DRUGCisplatin/ Etoposide

Cisplatin/ Etoposide, as per standard of care

Carboplatin /Paclitaxel, as per standard of care

Pemetrexed / Cisplatin, as per standard of care

Pemetrexed / Carboplatin , as per standard of care

RADIATIONRadiation

5 fractions/ week for \~6 weeks (±3 days) (Total 60 Gy)

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 130 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Principal inclusion criteria : * Subjects with histologically- or cytologically-documented NSCLC * Locally advanced, unresectable (Stage III) NSCLC * World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status 0-1 * At least one measurable lesion, not previously irradiated * Must have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks at randomization Principal

Exclusion criteria

: * Receipt of prior or current cancer treatment, including but not limited to, radiation therapy, investigational agents, chemotherapy, Durvalumab and mAbs. * Prior exposure to immune-mediated therapy, including but not limited to, other anti CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, and anti PD L2 antibodies, excluding therapeutic anticancer vaccines. * History of allogeneic organ transplantation * Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders * Uncontrolled intercurrent illness * History of another primary malignancy / leptomeningeal carcinomatosis / active primary immunodeficiency * Active infection including tuberculosis, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus * Mixed small cell and NSCLC histology * Any medical contraindication to treatment with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as listed in the local labelling * Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the IPs or any of the IP excipients. * Patients whose radiation treatment plans are likely to encompass a volume of whole lung receiving ≥20 Gy in total (V20) of more than 35% of lung volume.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Tumour scans performed at screening, 16 weeks ±1 week after randomization, then every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date (a maximum of approximately 1988 days).The PFS per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) using blinded independent central review (BICR) assessments was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective PD or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response Rate (ORR)Tumour scans performed at screening, 16 weeks ±1 week after randomization, then every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date (a maximum of approximately 1988 days).The ORR per RECIST 1.1 using BICR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on all participants in the FAS. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions since baseline. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions.
Overall Survival (OS)From screening until confirmed PD, assessed up to the DCO date (a maximum of approximately 1988 days).The OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
Percentage of Participants Alive at 24 Months From Randomization (OS24)Month 24The OS24 was defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 24 months. Median OS24 was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
Complete Response Rate (CRR)Tumour scans performed at screening, 16 weeks ±1 week after randomization, then every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date (a maximum of approximately 1988 days).The CRR per RECIST 1.1 using BICR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed response of CR. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions since baseline.
Duration of Response (DoR)Tumour scans performed at screening, 16 weeks ±1 week after randomization, then every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date (a maximum of approximately 1988 days).The DoR per RECIST 1.1 using BICR was defined as the time from the date of first documented response (which was subsequently confirmed) until the first date of documented progression or death in the absence of PD. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions since baseline. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions. The DoR was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
Disease Control Rate (DCR)Week 24The DCR at 24 weeks per RECIST 1.1 using BICR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a best objective response of CR or PR in the first 25 weeks (to allow for late assessment within the assessment window) or who had stable disease for \>= 23 weeks after randomization (to allow for an early assessment within the ± 1 week assessment window).
Time to Death or Distant Metastasis (TTDM)Tumour scans performed at screening, 16 weeks ±1 week after randomization, then every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date (a maximum of approximately 1988 days).The TTDM per RECIST 1.1 using BICR was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first date of distant metastasis or death in the absence of distant metastasis. Distant metastasis was defined as any new lesion that was outside the radiation field according to RECIST 1.1 or proven by biopsy.
Time From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2)Tumour scans performed at screening, 16 weeks ±1 week after randomization, then every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date (a maximum of approximately 1988 days).The PFS2 was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest of the progression event (subsequent to that used for the primary variable PFS per Investigator assessment) or death. The date of the second progression was recorded by the Investigator and defined according to local standard clinical practice and could have involved any of objective radiological, symptomatic progression, or death. Median PFS2 was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
Serum Concentration of DurvalumabEnd of infusion on Week 0, pre-infusion on Weeks 4 and 12, and Month 3 follow-upBlood samples were collected to determine the concentration of durvalumab.
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabPre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2 and 4Blood samples were collected to determine the presence of ADAs and ADA-neutralizing antibodies (nAb) for durvalumab using validated assays. ADA prevalence was defined as the number of participants with positive ADA result at any time, baseline or post-baseline. ADA incidence was defined as either treatment-induced (post-baseline ADA positive only) or treatment-boosted ADA (baseline positive ADA titer that was boosted to \>= 4-fold during the study period). Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA positive only post-baseline and not detected at baseline. Persistently positive was defined as having at least 2 post-baseline ADA positive assessments with at least 16 weeks between the first and last positive assessment, or ADA positive at the last post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive was defined as having at least 1 post-baseline ADA positive assessment without fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive.
Change From Baseline in Disease-Related Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Average Over 12 MonthsAt screening, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 20 weeks after randomization, then every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 52 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until PFS2. Assessed up to 12 months.Patient reported outcomes for 5 disease related symptoms was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-Core 30 (C30) items questionnaire (fatigue and appetite loss) and the EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer module 13 (LC13) (dysponea, cough and chest pain). An outcome variable consisting of a total score from 0 to 100 was derived for each of the symptom scales/symptom items, the functional scales, and the global health status scale with higher scores on the global health status/quality of life (QoL) and functioning scales representing better health status/function, but higher scores on symptom scales/items representing greater symptom severity. An improvement in symptoms were indicated by a negative change in score from baseline. A positive change in score from baseline indicated a deterioration of symptoms. A minimum clinically meaningful change was defined as a change from baseline of \>=10.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From time of signature of informed consent up to 90 days after last dose of study treatment or up to the date of initiation of the first subsequent therapy, whichever occurs first, approximately 1988 days.An AE is the development of any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE is an AE occurring during any study phase, that fulfils 1 or more of the following criteria: death, life-threatening, in-participant hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, congenital abnormality or birth defect, and an important medical event that may jeopardize the participant or may require medical treatment to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed above. AEs leading to discontinuation of study treatment were those with action taken was 'Drug Permanently Discontinued' for any study treatment.

Countries

Brazil, Czechia, Hungary, India, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Russia, South Korea, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), Vietnam

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJeffrey Bradley, MD

AstraZeneca

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This Phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in participants with locally advanced, unresectable Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at 87 study centers in North and South America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. The results are reported for analysis with assessment until data cut-off (DCO) date of 07 September 2023.

Pre-assignment details

The study had a screening period (up to 28 days), followed by a treatment and follow-up period (up to 1960 days). A total of 328 participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive durvalumab + standard of care (SoC) concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) group or placebo + SoC cCRT group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Durvalumab + SoC CRT
Participants received durvalumab 1500 mg IV infusion Q4W until PD or specific treatment discontinuation criteria were met. Participants received SOC CRT, consisting of concurrent radiotherapy and IV infusion of 1 of the following chemotherapy regimens. 1. Cisplatin + Etoposide: Cisplatin 50 mg/m\^2 on Days 1 and 8 and etoposide 50 mg/m\^2 on Days 1 to 5 Q4W of each 28-day cycle for 2 cycles plus 1 additional optional induction cycle. 2. Carboplatin + Paclitaxel: Carboplatin AUC 2 and paclitaxel 40-50 mg/m\^2 on Day 1 weekly basis for 6 weeks. Optional: Carboplatin AUC 5-6 and paclitaxel 175-200 mg/m\^2 Q3W given either as 1 induction cycle prior to initiation of RT or as 1-2 consolidation cycles after completion of RT. 3. Cisplatin + Pemetrexed: Cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 and pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 3 cycles plus 1 additional optional induction cycle. 4. Carboplatin + Pemetrexed: Carboplatin AUC 5 and pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles. Radiation: Either standard 3DCRT or IMRT was delivered using EBRT of 5 fractions per week for \ 6 weeks (± 3 days).
219
Placebo + SoC CRT
Participants received placebo matching with durvalumab IV infusion Q4W until PD or specific treatment discontinuation criteria were met. Participants received SOC CRT, consisting of concurrent radiotherapy and IV infusion of 1 of the following chemotherapy regimens. 1. Cisplatin + Etoposide: Cisplatin 50 mg/m\^2 on Days 1 and 8 and etoposide 50 mg/m\^2 on Days 1 to 5 Q4W of each 28-day cycle for 2 cycles plus 1 additional optional induction cycle. 2. Carboplatin + Paclitaxel: Carboplatin AUC 2 and paclitaxel 40-50 mg/m\^2 on Day 1 weekly basis for 6 weeks. Optional: Carboplatin AUC 5-6 and paclitaxel 175-200 mg/m\^2 Q3W given either as 1 induction cycle prior to initiation of RT or as 1-2 consolidation cycles after completion of RT. 3. Cisplatin + Pemetrexed: Cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 and pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 3 cycles plus 1 additional optional induction cycle. 4. Carboplatin + Pemetrexed: Carboplatin AUC 5 and pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles. Radiation: Either standard 3DCRT or IMRT was delivered using EBRT of 5 fractions per week for \ 6 weeks (± 3 days).
109
Total328

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDurvalumab + SoC CRTPlacebo + SoC CRTTotal
Age, Continuous62.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.96
62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
62.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.13
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
65 Participants39 Participants104 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
33 Participants21 Participants54 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
186 Participants88 Participants274 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
141 Participants62 Participants203 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
53 Participants29 Participants82 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
166 Participants80 Participants246 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
142 / 21969 / 109
other
Total, other adverse events
209 / 219106 / 108
serious
Total, serious adverse events
103 / 21956 / 108

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

The PFS per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) using blinded independent central review (BICR) assessments was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective PD or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame: Tumour scans performed at screening, 16 weeks ±1 week after randomization, then every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date (a maximum of approximately 1988 days).

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Durvalumab + SoC CRTProgression-Free Survival (PFS)13.8 months
Placebo + SoC CRTProgression-Free Survival (PFS)9.4 months
Comparison: The hazard ratio (HR) and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for age \[\< 65 versus (vs.) \>= 65 years\] and stage (IIIA vs. IIIB/C), with treatment as the only covariate and ties handled by Efron approach.p-value: 0.24795% CI: [0.647, 1.123]Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Disease-Related Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Average Over 12 Months

Patient reported outcomes for 5 disease related symptoms was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-Core 30 (C30) items questionnaire (fatigue and appetite loss) and the EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer module 13 (LC13) (dysponea, cough and chest pain). An outcome variable consisting of a total score from 0 to 100 was derived for each of the symptom scales/symptom items, the functional scales, and the global health status scale with higher scores on the global health status/quality of life (QoL) and functioning scales representing better health status/function, but higher scores on symptom scales/items representing greater symptom severity. An improvement in symptoms were indicated by a negative change in score from baseline. A positive change in score from baseline indicated a deterioration of symptoms. A minimum clinically meaningful change was defined as a change from baseline of \>=10.

Time frame: At screening, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 20 weeks after randomization, then every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 52 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until PFS2. Assessed up to 12 months.

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Only participants analyzed at baseline through Month 12 are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Durvalumab + SoC CRTChange From Baseline in Disease-Related Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Average Over 12 MonthsEORTC QLQ-C30: Fatigue symptoms1.3 units on a scale
Durvalumab + SoC CRTChange From Baseline in Disease-Related Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Average Over 12 MonthsEORTC QLQ-LC13: Dyspnoea symptoms1.1 units on a scale
Durvalumab + SoC CRTChange From Baseline in Disease-Related Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Average Over 12 MonthsEORTC QLQ-C30: Physical functioning-1.4 units on a scale
Durvalumab + SoC CRTChange From Baseline in Disease-Related Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Average Over 12 MonthsEORTC QLQ-LC13: Cough symptoms-6.1 units on a scale
Durvalumab + SoC CRTChange From Baseline in Disease-Related Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Average Over 12 MonthsEORTC QLQ-C30: Appetite loss symptoms3.0 units on a scale
Durvalumab + SoC CRTChange From Baseline in Disease-Related Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Average Over 12 MonthsEORTC QLQ-LC13: Pain in chest symptoms-1.9 units on a scale
Durvalumab + SoC CRTChange From Baseline in Disease-Related Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Average Over 12 MonthsEORTC QLQ-C30: Global health status/QoL-0.5 units on a scale
Placebo + SoC CRTChange From Baseline in Disease-Related Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Average Over 12 MonthsEORTC QLQ-LC13: Pain in chest symptoms-0.8 units on a scale
Placebo + SoC CRTChange From Baseline in Disease-Related Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Average Over 12 MonthsEORTC QLQ-C30: Global health status/QoL0.2 units on a scale
Placebo + SoC CRTChange From Baseline in Disease-Related Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Average Over 12 MonthsEORTC QLQ-C30: Physical functioning-0.8 units on a scale
Placebo + SoC CRTChange From Baseline in Disease-Related Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Average Over 12 MonthsEORTC QLQ-C30: Fatigue symptoms0.3 units on a scale
Placebo + SoC CRTChange From Baseline in Disease-Related Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Average Over 12 MonthsEORTC QLQ-C30: Appetite loss symptoms0.3 units on a scale
Placebo + SoC CRTChange From Baseline in Disease-Related Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Average Over 12 MonthsEORTC QLQ-LC13: Dyspnoea symptoms-1.3 units on a scale
Placebo + SoC CRTChange From Baseline in Disease-Related Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Average Over 12 MonthsEORTC QLQ-LC13: Cough symptoms-6.5 units on a scale
Secondary

Complete Response Rate (CRR)

The CRR per RECIST 1.1 using BICR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed response of CR. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions since baseline.

Time frame: Tumour scans performed at screening, 16 weeks ±1 week after randomization, then every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date (a maximum of approximately 1988 days).

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Durvalumab + SoC CRTComplete Response Rate (CRR)1.8 percentage of participants
Placebo + SoC CRTComplete Response Rate (CRR)1.8 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-4.8, 3]
Secondary

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

The DCR at 24 weeks per RECIST 1.1 using BICR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a best objective response of CR or PR in the first 25 weeks (to allow for late assessment within the assessment window) or who had stable disease for \>= 23 weeks after randomization (to allow for an early assessment within the ± 1 week assessment window).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Durvalumab + SoC CRTDisease Control Rate (DCR)65.8 percentage of participants
Placebo + SoC CRTDisease Control Rate (DCR)65.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Response (DoR)

The DoR per RECIST 1.1 using BICR was defined as the time from the date of first documented response (which was subsequently confirmed) until the first date of documented progression or death in the absence of PD. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions since baseline. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions. The DoR was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame: Tumour scans performed at screening, 16 weeks ±1 week after randomization, then every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date (a maximum of approximately 1988 days).

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Only participants with objective response are analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Durvalumab + SoC CRTDuration of Response (DoR)30.7 months
Placebo + SoC CRTDuration of Response (DoR)18.6 months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab

Blood samples were collected to determine the presence of ADAs and ADA-neutralizing antibodies (nAb) for durvalumab using validated assays. ADA prevalence was defined as the number of participants with positive ADA result at any time, baseline or post-baseline. ADA incidence was defined as either treatment-induced (post-baseline ADA positive only) or treatment-boosted ADA (baseline positive ADA titer that was boosted to \>= 4-fold during the study period). Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA positive only post-baseline and not detected at baseline. Persistently positive was defined as having at least 2 post-baseline ADA positive assessments with at least 16 weeks between the first and last positive assessment, or ADA positive at the last post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive was defined as having at least 1 post-baseline ADA positive assessment without fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive.

Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2 and 4

Population: The ADA analysis set included all participants who had non-missing baseline ADA and at least 1 non-missing post-baseline ADA result.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Durvalumab + SoC CRTNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabTransient positive4 Participants
Durvalumab + SoC CRTNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabADA positive at any visit (ADA prevalence)20 Participants
Durvalumab + SoC CRTNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabTreatment-emergent ADA positive (ADA incidence)8 Participants
Durvalumab + SoC CRTNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabADA positive at both baseline and post-baseline2 Participants
Durvalumab + SoC CRTNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabTreatment-induced ADA8 Participants
Durvalumab + SoC CRTNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabADA positive at baseline only10 Participants
Durvalumab + SoC CRTNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabTreatment-boosted ADA0 Participants
Durvalumab + SoC CRTNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabPersistent positive6 Participants
Durvalumab + SoC CRTNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabnAb positive at any visit1 Participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

The ORR per RECIST 1.1 using BICR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on all participants in the FAS. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions since baseline. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions.

Time frame: Tumour scans performed at screening, 16 weeks ±1 week after randomization, then every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date (a maximum of approximately 1988 days).

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Durvalumab + SoC CRTObjective Response Rate (ORR)60.7 percentage of participants
Placebo + SoC CRTObjective Response Rate (ORR)60.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.97699.5% CI: [-15.2, 16.3]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

The OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame: From screening until confirmed PD, assessed up to the DCO date (a maximum of approximately 1988 days).

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Durvalumab + SoC CRTOverall Survival (OS)36.4 months
Placebo + SoC CRTOverall Survival (OS)29.5 months
p-value: 0.82395% CI: [0.778, 1.386]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Alive at 24 Months From Randomization (OS24)

The OS24 was defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 24 months. Median OS24 was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame: Month 24

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Durvalumab + SoC CRTPercentage of Participants Alive at 24 Months From Randomization (OS24)58.4 percentage of participants
Placebo + SoC CRTPercentage of Participants Alive at 24 Months From Randomization (OS24)59.5 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.84795% CI: [0.716, 1.502]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is the development of any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE is an AE occurring during any study phase, that fulfils 1 or more of the following criteria: death, life-threatening, in-participant hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, congenital abnormality or birth defect, and an important medical event that may jeopardize the participant or may require medical treatment to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed above. AEs leading to discontinuation of study treatment were those with action taken was 'Drug Permanently Discontinued' for any study treatment.

Time frame: From time of signature of informed consent up to 90 days after last dose of study treatment or up to the date of initiation of the first subsequent therapy, whichever occurs first, approximately 1988 days.

Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Durvalumab + SoC CRTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any AE leading to discontinuation of treatment34.7 percentage of participants
Durvalumab + SoC CRTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any AE98.6 percentage of participants
Durvalumab + SoC CRTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any immune-mediated AE48.9 percentage of participants
Durvalumab + SoC CRTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any SAE47.0 percentage of participants
Placebo + SoC CRTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any immune-mediated AE28.7 percentage of participants
Placebo + SoC CRTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any AE100.0 percentage of participants
Placebo + SoC CRTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any AE leading to discontinuation of treatment19.4 percentage of participants
Placebo + SoC CRTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any SAE51.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Serum Concentration of Durvalumab

Blood samples were collected to determine the concentration of durvalumab.

Time frame: End of infusion on Week 0, pre-infusion on Weeks 4 and 12, and Month 3 follow-up

Population: The Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of durvalumab or matching placebo per protocol, for whom any post-dose data were available and did not violate or deviate from the protocol in ways that would significantly affect the PK analyses. Only participants analyzed at specific timepoint are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Durvalumab + SoC CRTSerum Concentration of DurvalumabWeek 0: End of infusion452.21 microgram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 78.94
Durvalumab + SoC CRTSerum Concentration of DurvalumabWeek 4: Pre-infusion82.02 microgram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 80.85
Durvalumab + SoC CRTSerum Concentration of DurvalumabWeek 12: Pre-infusion123.39 microgram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 163.2
Durvalumab + SoC CRTSerum Concentration of DurvalumabMonth 3 Follow-up15.79 microgram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 243.41
Secondary

Time From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2)

The PFS2 was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest of the progression event (subsequent to that used for the primary variable PFS per Investigator assessment) or death. The date of the second progression was recorded by the Investigator and defined according to local standard clinical practice and could have involved any of objective radiological, symptomatic progression, or death. Median PFS2 was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame: Tumour scans performed at screening, 16 weeks ±1 week after randomization, then every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date (a maximum of approximately 1988 days).

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Durvalumab + SoC CRTTime From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2)27.8 months
Placebo + SoC CRTTime From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2)22.0 months
p-value: 0.13295% CI: [0.614, 1.071]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Death or Distant Metastasis (TTDM)

The TTDM per RECIST 1.1 using BICR was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first date of distant metastasis or death in the absence of distant metastasis. Distant metastasis was defined as any new lesion that was outside the radiation field according to RECIST 1.1 or proven by biopsy.

Time frame: Tumour scans performed at screening, 16 weeks ±1 week after randomization, then every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date (a maximum of approximately 1988 days).

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Durvalumab + SoC CRTTime to Death or Distant Metastasis (TTDM)51.0 months
Placebo + SoC CRTTime to Death or Distant Metastasis (TTDM)46.3 months
p-value: 0.7995% CI: [0.649, 1.413]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 15, 2026