Skip to content

Comparison of Comfilcon A Toric Contact Lenses and Samfilcon A Toric Contact Lenses

A Bilateral Dispensing Comparison of Biofinity Toric and Ultra for Astigmatism

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03519932
Enrollment
49
Registered
2018-05-09
Start date
2018-04-30
Completion date
2019-02-01
Last updated
2020-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Astigmatism

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the subjective acceptance of comfilcon A toric contact lens, compared to samfilcon A toric lens.

Interventions

Contact lens

DEVICEsamfilcon A toric lens

Contact lens

Sponsors

CooperVision, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Is at least 17 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer; * Has had a self-reported oculo-visual examination in the last two years. * Has read and signed an information consent letter; * Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule; * Is an adapted soft contact lens wearer, who currently wears contact lenses for a minimum 3 days/week and 8 hours/day AND who anticipates no difficulty wearing CLs for 6 days/week, 10 hours /day. * Is willing to wear contact lens in both eyes for the duration of the study; * Has a minimum astigmatism of - 0.75, determined by refraction; * Can be fit with the two study contact lens types in the powers available; * Has a distance visual acuity of 0.20 logMAR (approx 20/30) or better, determined by refraction; * Can achieve a distance visual acuity of 0.20 logMAR (approx 20/30) or better in each eye with the study contact lenses. * Has clear corneas and no active\* ocular disease

Exclusion criteria

* Is participating in any concurrent clinical trial; * Has any known active\* ocular disease and/or infection; * Has a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study measure; * Is using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study measure; * Has known sensitivity to fluorescein dye or products to be used in the study; * Appears to have any active\* ocular pathology, ocular anomaly or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion (severe dry eye) that would affect the wearing of contact lenses; * Is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment (by verbal confirmation at the screening visit); * Is aphakic; * Has undergone refractive error surgery. * Has participated in the PIANO (i.e. EX-MKTG-83) Study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comfort2 weeksSubjective ratings of comfort for each pair of lenses (scale: 0-10; 0=painful,10=can't feel lens)
Lens Preference Based on Overall Dryness1 monthLens preference with respect to dryness (Prefer pair-1 strongly, Prefer pair-1 slightly, Prefer pair-2 strongly, prefer pair-2 slightly, No preference)
Dryness2 weeksSubjective ratings of dryness for each pair of lenses (scale: 0-10; 0=Extremely dry, 10=No dryness)
Comfort at InsertionDispenseSubjective ratings of comfort for each pair of lenses (scale: 0-10; 0=painful,10=can't feel lens)
Lens Preference Based on Overall Comfort1 monthLens preference with respect to comfort (Prefer pair-1 strongly, Prefer pair-1 slightly, Prefer pair-2 strongly, prefer pair-2 slightly, No preference)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ease of Removal2-weeksSubjective rating of ease of removing the lens from the eye (scale 0-10; 0=very difficult, 10=very easy)
Ease of InsertionDispenseSubjective rating of ease of inserting the lens onto the eye (scale 0-10; 0=very difficult, 10=very easy)

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Subjects were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for 1-month and samfilcon A toric lenses for 1-month in this cross-over dispensing study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study
Total Participants
49
Total49

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
First InterventionAdverse Event13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
49 Participants
Age, Continuous26.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
49 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 450 / 45
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 450 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 450 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Comfort

Subjective ratings of comfort for each pair of lenses (scale: 0-10; 0=painful,10=can't feel lens)

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: One subject's subjective rating was excluded for comfilcon A toric due to subject confusion at rating scale and potentially reversing its use.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Toric LensComfortOverall8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Comfilcon A Toric LensComfortRemoval7.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Samfilcon A Toric LensComfortOverall7.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Samfilcon A Toric LensComfortRemoval6.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Primary

Comfort

Subjective ratings of comfort for each pair of lenses (scale: 0-10; 0=painful,10=can't feel lens)

Time frame: 1-month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Toric LensComfortOverall8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Comfilcon A Toric LensComfortRemoval7.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Samfilcon A Toric LensComfortOverall7.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Samfilcon A Toric LensComfortRemoval6.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Primary

Comfort at Insertion

Subjective ratings of comfort for each pair of lenses (scale: 0-10; 0=painful,10=can't feel lens)

Time frame: Dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Toric LensComfort at Insertion9.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Samfilcon A Toric LensComfort at Insertion8.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Primary

Dryness

Subjective ratings of dryness for each pair of lenses (scale: 0-10; 0=Extremely dry, 10=No dryness)

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: One subject's subjective rating was excluded for comfilcon A toric due to subject confusion at rating scale and potentially reversing its use.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Toric LensDrynessOverall7.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Comfilcon A Toric LensDrynessRemoval6.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Samfilcon A Toric LensDrynessOverall6.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Samfilcon A Toric LensDrynessRemoval6.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Primary

Dryness

Subjective ratings of dryness for each pair of lenses (scale: 0-10; 0=Extremely dry, 10=No dryness)

Time frame: 1-month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Toric LensDrynessOverall7.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Comfilcon A Toric LensDrynessRemoval6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Samfilcon A Toric LensDrynessOverall6.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Samfilcon A Toric LensDrynessRemoval6.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Primary

Lens Preference Based on Overall Comfort

Lens preference with respect to comfort (Prefer pair-1 strongly, Prefer pair-1 slightly, Prefer pair-2 strongly, prefer pair-2 slightly, No preference)

Time frame: 1 month

Population: Percentages may be rounded and therefore may not add up to equal to 100%

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon A Toric LensLens Preference Based on Overall ComfortStrongly prefer comfilcon A44 percentage of participants
Comfilcon A Toric LensLens Preference Based on Overall ComfortSlightly Prefer comfilcon A27 percentage of participants
Comfilcon A Toric LensLens Preference Based on Overall ComfortNo Preference7 percentage of participants
Comfilcon A Toric LensLens Preference Based on Overall ComfortSlightly prefer samfilcon A7 percentage of participants
Comfilcon A Toric LensLens Preference Based on Overall ComfortStrongly prefer samfilcon A16 percentage of participants
Primary

Lens Preference Based on Overall Dryness

Lens preference with respect to dryness (Prefer pair-1 strongly, Prefer pair-1 slightly, Prefer pair-2 strongly, prefer pair-2 slightly, No preference)

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Comfilcon A Toric LensLens Preference Based on Overall DrynessStrongly prefer comfilcon A29 percentage of participants
Comfilcon A Toric LensLens Preference Based on Overall DrynessSlightly prefer comfilcon A33 percentage of participants
Comfilcon A Toric LensLens Preference Based on Overall DrynessNo Preference16 percentage of participants
Comfilcon A Toric LensLens Preference Based on Overall DrynessSlightly prefer samfilcon A4 percentage of participants
Comfilcon A Toric LensLens Preference Based on Overall DrynessStrongly prefer samfilcon A18 percentage of participants
Secondary

Ease of Insertion

Subjective rating of ease of inserting the lens onto the eye (scale 0-10; 0=very difficult, 10=very easy)

Time frame: Dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Toric LensEase of Insertion9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Samfilcon A Toric LensEase of Insertion9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Ease of Insertion

Subjective rating of ease of inserting the lens onto the eye (scale 0-10; 0=very difficult, 10=very easy)

Time frame: 2-weeks

Population: One subject's subjective rating was excluded for comfilcon A toric due to subject confusion at rating scale and potentially reversing its use.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Toric LensEase of Insertion8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Samfilcon A Toric LensEase of Insertion8.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Ease of Insertion

Subjective rating of ease of inserting the lens onto the eye (scale 0-10; 0=very difficult, 10=very easy)

Time frame: 1-month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Toric LensEase of Insertion9.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Samfilcon A Toric LensEase of Insertion8.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Ease of Removal

Subjective rating of ease of removing the lens from the eye (scale 0-10; 0=very difficult, 10=very easy)

Time frame: 2-weeks

Population: One subject's subjective rating was excluded for comfilcon A toric due to subject confusion at rating scale and potentially reversing its use.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Toric LensEase of Removal7.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Samfilcon A Toric LensEase of Removal8.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Ease of Removal

Subjective rating of ease of removing the lens from the eye (scale 0-10; 0=very difficult, 10=very easy)

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Comfilcon A Toric LensEase of Removal8.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Samfilcon A Toric LensEase of Removal8.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026