Skip to content

A Pragmatic Randomised Study to Optimise Screening, Prevention and Care for Tuberculosis in Malawi

A Pragmatic Randomised Study to Optimise Screening, Prevention and Care for Tuberculosis in Malawi

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03519425
Acronym
PROSPECT
Enrollment
1455
Registered
2018-05-09
Start date
2018-11-15
Completion date
2020-06-30
Last updated
2019-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hiv, Tuberculosis, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

Keywords

Tuberculosis, HIV, Randomised controlled trial, Africa, Public Health, Screening

Brief summary

A pragmatic open, three-arm individually-randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation will be conducted in one primary health care centre in Blantyre, Malawi, where HIV and TB are major contributors to early mortality. Participants will be adults with symptoms of tuberculosis (cough of any duration) attending the primary clinic with an acute care episode. We will exclude adults who have taken treatment for TB within the previous 6-months, who are taking isoniazid preventive therapy, who are not resident of Blantyre, or who plan to move out of Blantyre in the following 6-months. Participants will be randomly allocated into one of three groups: Group 1: Standard of care: Participants will be seen by facility health workers and receive clinician-directed screening for HIV and TB according to Malawi national guidelines. Group 2: Optimised HIV testing and treatment linkage: Participants will be offered testing for HIV using rapid oral fluid kits by research assistants. Those with confirmed HIV infection will be linked to the HIV care clinic where facility healthworkers will screen for TB using standard sputum-based diagnostics. Group 3: Optimised TB diagnosis, HIV screening and treatment linkage: Participants will receive a high-throughput and high-sensitivity TB screening intervention, in addition to the HIV testing intervention. This will comprise of an initial digital chest x-ray classified by the CAD4TB image-recognition software as either high probability of TB, or low probability of TB. Participants whose x-rays are suggestive of TB will receive confirmatory sputum testing with Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra cartridges, whilst participants whose x-rays have a low probability of TB will be referred to facility healthworkers for routine care. All participants will be seen at the health facility at day 56, where they will be tested for HIV (if not on ART) and screened for TB. The Primary Trial Outcome will compare between groups the time to tuberculosis treatment initiation by day 56. The trial is sufficiently powered to permit 3 pairwise comparisons between groups (i.e. Group 1 vs. 2; Group 2 vs. 3; and Group 1 vs. 3). This three-arm pragmatic trial design allows us to efficiently answer two separate, important public health questions: firstly, by comparing Group 2 to Group 1, we should be able to determine whether HIV care should be prioritised for adults with TB symptoms. Additionally, by comparing Group 3 to Group 2, we will provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of an optimised and integrated HIV and TB diagnostic and treatment linkage approach.

Detailed description

Ambitious global targets have been set to eliminate tuberculosis as a public health problem by 2035. However, in Africa, where HIV has driven extremely high incidence rates, progress in reducing new infections and TB deaths remains too slow. We have previously demonstrated that adults seeking diagnosis and treatment for TB and HIV face considerable barriers, and have long delays in starting treatment with high pre-treatment mortality. Efforts to reduce TB mortality have been hampered by limitations in TB diagnostics, with considerable uncertainty about how available and new tests can be best implemented. The aim of the PROSPECT Study is therefore to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of optimised TB/HIV diagnosis and treatment linkage interventions on TB and HIV case detection, treatment initiation and mortality. Study design A pragmatic open, three-arm individually-randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation will be conducted in one primary health care centre in Blantyre, Malawi. Study site and participants The study will be conducted at one primary health clinic in Blantyre Malawi, where we have established HIV and TB research facilities and previously demonstrated high need for improved TB and HIV diagnosis. Sputum-based TB diagnostics (smear microscopy, and Xpert MTB/Rif) and treatment, and comprehensive HIV care (including provider-initiated HIV testing and antiretroviral therapy) are available free-to-cost to patients through the Malawi national TB and HIV programmes. Participants will be adults with symptoms of pulmonary tuberculosis (cough of any duration) attending the primary clinic with an acute care episode. We will exclude adults who have taken treatment for TB within the previous 6-months, or who are taking isoniazid preventive therapy, or who do not live in Blantyre, or plan to move out of Blantyre. Interventions Participants will be randomly allocated into one of three groups: Group 1 - Standard of care: Participants will be seen by facility health workers and receive clinician-directed screening for HIV and TB according to Malawi national guidelines without further study input. Group 2 - Optimised HIV testing and treatment linkage: Participants will be offered testing for HIV using rapid oral fluid kits by research assistants. Those with confirmed HIV infection will be linked to the HIV care clinic where facility healthworkers will screen for TB using standard sputum-based diagnostics without further study input. Group 3 - Optimised TB diagnosis, HIV screening and treatment linkage: Participants will receive a high-throughput and high-sensitivity TB screening intervention, in addition to the HIV testing intervention. This will comprise of an initial digital chest x-ray classified by the CAD4TB image-recognition software as either high probability of TB, or low probability of TB. Participants whose x-rays are classified as having high probability of TB will receive confirmatory sputum testing with Xpert MTB/Rif cartridges, whilst participants whose x-rays have a low probability of TB will be referred to facility healthworkers for routine care. All participants will be seen at the health facility at day 56, where they will be assessed to determine whether they are taking treatment for tuberculosis by inspection of medication, inspection of treatment cards, and inspection of facility TB registers. They will also be offered testing for HIV (if not on ART) and screened for TB, including by sputum culture, Xpert and smear microscopy. Outcomes The primary trial outcome will be time in days - from Day 0 up to but not including Day 56 - to tuberculosis treatment initiation, evaluated at Day 56 following randomization. The trial is sufficiently powered to permit 3 pairwise comparisons between groups (i.e. Group 1 vs. 2; Group 2 vs. 3; and Group 1 vs. 3). This three-arm pragmatic trial design allows us to efficiently answer two separate, important public health questions: firstly, by comparing Group 2 to Group 1, we should be able to determine whether HIV care should be prioritised for adults with TB symptoms. Additionally, by comparing Group 3 to Group 2, we will provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of an optimised and integrated HIV and TB diagnostic and treatment linkage approach. Statistical considerations Assuming 17% of participants in Group 1 initiate TB treatment by 8-weeks, and 5% loss to-follow-up, a sample size of n=1455 participants randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio across the three groups provides at least 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 1.5 comparing Group 2 to Group 1, and a hazard ratio of 1.41 comparing Group 3 to Group 2.

Interventions

OTHEROptimised HIV screening and linkage to care

As described in group descriptions

OTHEROptimised tuberculosis screening and linkage to care

As described in group descriptions

Sponsors

Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme
CollaboratorOTHER
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Liverpool
CollaboratorOTHER
McGill University
CollaboratorOTHER
Kamuzu University of Health Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

A pragmatic open, three-arm individually-randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Attends Study Clinic with an acute care episode * 18 years of age or older on the day of clinic attendance * Has symptoms of tuberculosis (cough of any duration) * Is resident within urban Blantyre * Provides informed consent to participate

Exclusion criteria

* Taking treatment for tuberculosis on the day of clinic attendance * Has taken any treatment for tuberculosis in the 6-months prior to clinic attendance * Is taking isoniazid preventive therapy * Plans to move out of Blantyre to live elsewhere in the following 6-months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to tuberculosis treatment initiationMeasured at 56 days after randomisationThe primary trial outcome will be time in days - from Day 0 up to but not including Day 56 - to tuberculosis treatment initiation, evaluated at Day 56 following randomization. Analysis of the primary outcome will be done on an intention to treat basis, with all participants analysed according to the group to which they were randomised. Time to TB treatment outcome analysis will be right censored at Day 56 from randomisation if TB treatment is not initiated, or at day of loss to follow-up. We will make three pair-wise comparisons (Group 2 vs. Group 1; Group 3 vs. Group 2; and Group 3 vs. Group 1).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Same day TB treatment initiationMeasured at 56 days after randomisationThe proportion of randomised participants initiated onto tuberculosis treatment on the same day as randomisation, with the numerator being participants who were initiated on tuberculosis treatment on Day 0, and the denominator being all randomised participants.
Undiagnosed/untreated microbiologically-confirmed pulmonary tuberculosisMeasured at 56 days after randomisationThe proportion of randomised participants with undiagnosed/untreated microbiologically-confirmed pulmonary TB at Day 56, with the numerator being participants with microbiologically-confirmed tuberculosis (either sputum culture, or sputum Xpert, or sputum smear microscopy positive on a sample taken on Day 56) and who are confirmed not to be taking tuberculosis treatment on Day 56 (including participants who have previously initiated tuberculosis treatment, but have defaulted or stopped treatment - regardless of reason - for at least one week). The denominator will be all randomised participants.
Undiagnosed/untreated HIVMeasured at 56 days after randomisationThe proportion of randomised participants with undiagnosed/untreated HIV at Day 56, with the numerator being participants with positive confirmatory HIV test results at Day 56 and who are not taking antiretroviral therapy (regardless of previous HIV test results during or before the study period), and the denominator being all randomised participants.
Time to antiretroviral therapy initiationMeasured at 56 days after randomisationTime in days - from Day 0 up to but not including Day 56 - to initiation of antiretroviral therapy among participants with positive confirmatory HIV test results at Day 56 and who were not taking antiretroviral therapy at Day 0. Initiation of antiretroviral therapy will be defined by: A participant in whom there is documented evidence of commencement of combination antiretroviral therapy treatment, either by: inspection of the participant-carried national HIV programme treatment card; or inspection of the facility antiretroviral therapy treatment register; or inspection of antiretroviral therapy medication bottles or pill boxes.
MortalityMeasured at 56 days after randomisationThe proportion of randomised participants reported to have died by Day 56, with the numerator being participants confirmed to have died through home tracing visits or TB treatment records, and the denominator being all randomised participants.
Quality of life (EQ5D visual analogue scale)Measured at 56 days after randomisationMean difference in EuroQoL EQ5D visual analogue scale score, adjusting for participants' EQ5D visual analogue scale score measured at Day 0.
Cost-effectivenessMeasured at 56 days after randomisationIncremental cost-effectiveness per QALY gained
TB treatment outcomeMeasured at 6-months after randomisationThe proportion of TB cases with a successful TB treatment outcome. The numerator will be participants who were initiated onto tuberculosis treatment (either microbiologically-confirmed or clinically-diagnosed tuberculosis) up to, but not including Day 56, and who have a successful TB treatment outcome (either cured or completed treatment) at 6-months after starting treatment. The denominator will be all participants confirmed to have initiated tuberculosis treatment between Day 0 and up to, but not including Day 56.
Quality of life (EQ5D utility score)Measured at 56 days after randomisationMean difference in EuroQoL EQ5D utility score at Day 56, adjusting for participants' EQ5D utility score measured at Day 0.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sex-and microbiological TB status-stratified analysisMeasured at 56 days after randomisationAlthough not statistically powered for comparison, in pre-specified exploratory sub-group analysis, we will stratify analysis of comparisons between pairs of groups for the primary outcome of time to tuberculosis treatment initiation (stratified by sex, and by microbiological TB status), and for the secondary outcomes of the proportion of participants with undiagnosed/untreated microbiologically-confirmed TB (stratified by sex), and undiagnosed/untreated HIV (stratified by sex). These pre-specified exploratory analyses will be done for hypothesis-generating purposes and to support the case for future research, as our previous studies have shown that men fare considerable worse than women throughout the TB and HIV diagnostic and care pathways.
Exploratory Bayesian analysisMeasured at 56 days after randomisationWe will additionally undertake a Bayesian analysis of the primary trial outcome. Prior distributions for the proportion of participants initiating TB treatment will be elicited from key stakeholder groups, including community members, clinicians, researchers, TB experts, and policymakers. Key stakeholders will be invited to attend workshop meetings, where they will be introduced to the study design and interventions through presentations and group discussions. To elicit prior beliefs for effect of interventions, we will use a bin-and-chip method, implemented within an interactive web application. Using Bayes' theorem, we will combine elicited stakeholder group-specific log hazard ratio prior distributions with log-likelihood hazard ratio distributions from each pairwise comparison being made in the PROSPECT Study to construct posterior probability distributions.

Countries

Malawi

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026