Clinical Decision Making, Nonarthritic Hip Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
The investigators aim to understand how interdisciplinary care influences decisions, expectations, and outcomes for patients with non-arthritic hip disease (NAHD). Patients presenting to the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC) Hip Preservation Clinic will be approached for participation. All participants will proceed with their scheduled, standard-care physician evaluation. Participants without NAHD will be excluded. Participants will then be randomized to receive a same-day physical therapist (PT) evaluation. This PT evaluation is not a standard-care practice in the clinic, this was added for research. All participants will complete expectation surveys before and after their evaluation(s). The clinicians will discuss their recommended plan with the patient and the patient will record a final treatment decision and outcome expectations. Participants will then be randomized to either receive posture and movement training (PMT) for 3 weeks or undergo a 3-week wait period. All participants will be required to withhold any treatment during this 3-week period (except PMT in the PMT group). The 3-week wait period for the no-PMT group is aligned with current clinical processes for time from physician evaluation to start of treatment. All participants may proceed with any further interventions (including PMT) after the 3-week period, but none will be provided/required as part of research. Patient-reported outcomes and clinical tests will be recorded before and after the 3-week period, and 3 and 6 months later. Adding a PT evaluation to the physician visit provides no additional risk because the PT evaluation includes similar clinical tests to the physician and movement analysis during tasks participants complete during daily life. Clinical tests before/after the 3-week intervention period may produce muscle soreness that should resolve within 2 days. Understanding how interdisciplinary care influences expectations and outcomes can inform clinicians regarding the effectiveness of interdisciplinary collaboration.
Detailed description
The clinical evaluation by the physician is standard-of-care and performed as part of potential participants' scheduled appointment. Participants in this study will complete a HIPAA authorization to allow data from their clinical evaluation by the physician to be utilized for this study, including any imaging the physician used in their clinical evaluation and the evaluation note entered into the participant's electronic health record. The physician notes are standardized, allowing streamlined data analysis from the electronic health record. Research activities to occur the same day as the informed consent process include randomization to receive or not receive a clinical evaluation by a physical therapist along with surveys for treatment decisions, expected outcomes, and patient-reported function. A small sub-group of patients will also complete interviews to identify how they felt about their evaluation that day. The HIPAA authorization will also allow the data from the physical therapy evaluation and any subsequent posture and movement training at OSUWMC to be utilized for this study. Regardless of randomization to receive or not receive a same-day physical therapy evaluation in the physician clinic, all participants will be randomized to receive posture and movement training (PMT) or undergo a 3-week wait period. Participants who are randomized to receive PMT as part of this research study will schedule based on their availability, twice weekly for 3 weeks with an OSUWMC Sports Medicine physical therapist who also hold IRB-approved status as research personnel. Participants will be made aware during the informed consent process that any PMT they receive as part of this study will be their responsibility to pay for using either self-pay or insurance-based methods. Participants who refuse randomization to receive PMT will be offered to participate in the observational group. These participants proceed with the same baseline and follow-up testing, but continue with their treatment-of-choice rather than an assigned treatment during the 3-week intervention period. All participants will complete baseline and follow-up biomechanical and clinical follow-up testing in the Motion Analysis and Performance Laboratory. Biomechanical testing involves using 3-dimensional motion capture techniques to analyze movement during 3 functional tasks including walking, sit-to-stand, and a forward tap-down. Clinical testing involves obtaining anthropometric measures, hip strength, patient-reported function, and planned treatment decisions with respective expected outcomes. A small sub-group of patients will also complete interviews at these testing sessions to identify how they feel about the intervention (wait or posture & movement training). Posture and movement training involves the physical therapist prescribing therapeutic exercises and activities to improve posture and movement (Harris-Hayes 2016), focusing heavily on extrinsic cueing (Benjaminse 2015). Therapeutic exercises and activities will be individualized based on the participant's presentation and will progress according to pain and quality of movement from double-leg to single-leg activities and from functional to more dynamic tasks. Participants who are randomized to undergo a 3-week wait period will be required to withhold any treatment during the 3-week wait period. These participants will complete the same testing as the participants in the PMT group (see next paragraph). These participants will not receive any intervention during the 3-week wait period; however, after their first follow-up testing session (within 1 week of completing the 3-week wait period), these participants may proceed with any intervention of their choice. The participants in the PMT group may also proceed with any intervention after their first follow-up testing session. These follow-up interventions will not be provided or required as part of the research study, but participants will be asked to report if they completed any follow-up interventions between their first follow-up testing session and their 3month and 6month follow-up testing sessions. Follow-up testing will occur within 1-week of completing the 3-week intervention period. At this point, participants in both the PMT and no-PMT groups may proceed with any intervention (i.e. surgery, injection, physical therapy). All participants will perform additional follow-up testing at 3- and 6-months post-intervention. Qualitative interviews will be conducted to evaluate how physicians and physical therapists involved in the study feel about the evaluation and treatment protocols.
Interventions
The hip arthroscopist will conduct his or her standard-care evaluation including subjective interview, patient history, imaging, and physical examination. The physical therapist will conduct an assessment of posture and movement during sitting, standing, squatting, and walking. After providers discuss their findings, they will discuss the plan of care with the participant.
Physical therapists will lead participants through an intervention protocol to normalize seated and standing posture and function movement. Verbal, visual, and tactile cues, along with strengthening exercises will be provided to train posture and movement.
Participants may proceed with any treatment-of-choice, which may or may not have been recommended by their health care provider(s). Treatments will be recorded, but not controlled.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Over 18 years old NAHD diagnosis
Exclusion criteria
* Osteoporosis or rheumatoid arthritis * Systemic health condition * Legal representative required for treatment decisions * Bilateral symptoms * Current spine, hip, knee, or ankle surgery or major injury\* * Pregnancy * Total hip arthroplasty candidate (Tönnis grade \> 2) * Periacetabular osteotomy candidate (lateral center edge angle\<20, anterior center edge angle\<18, acetabular index \>10) * Participants with history of spine, hip, knee, or ankle surgery or major injury will be evaluated by the physician to determine appropriateness for evaluation (and treatment) by a physical therapist
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Decisional Conflict | Pre-evaluation, 10min Post-evaluation | Participants will report decisional conflict related to their treatment plan. Decisional conflict was measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale ranging from 0 (no conflict, better outcome) to 100 (high conflict, worse outcome). |
| Treatment Plan | Post-evaluation, same-day (approximately 5-10min after evaluation) | Participants will indicate their planned treatment(s) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Participant Protocol Opinions | 20min post-evaluation, 4 weeks post-evaluation | Participants will be interviewed to collect information on how they feel about the 1) evaluation protocol(s) and 2) treatment/wait period protocols. |
| Patient-reported Hip Function | 10min post-evaluation, 4-week laboratory visit | Participants will complete validated, reliable surveys for hip function (the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living \[HOSADL\] was used and is scored from 0-100 with 0 representing the worst function and 100 representing the best function). Baseline scores for participants in Period 3 (Laboratory testing) were obtained from participants' post-evaluation surveys from Period 1 (clinic evaluation). |
| Movement Mechanics | Baseline laboratory visit, 4-week laboratory visit | 3-dimensional movement mechanics will be collected during functional tasks including walking and rising from a chair |
| Decisional Conflict | 10min post-evaluation, 4-week laboratory visit | Participants will report decisional conflict related to their treatment plan. Decisional conflict was measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale ranging from 0 (no conflict, better outcome) to 100 (high conflict, worse outcome). Baseline scores for participants in Period 3 (Laboratory testing) were obtained from participants' post-evaluation surveys from Period 1 (clinic evaluation). |
| Themes From Provider Interviews | Pre-enrollment (2-7days before patient participant recruitment began), Post-enrollment (1-7 days after patient participant recruitment ended) | Qualitative interviews will be conducted with study providers both before patient participant enrollment and after study completion to collect information on how they feel about the evaluation protocols. Qualitative analysis of this data will count responses based on themes. Data for this report will be provided as the total number of responses (across all providers) that fell within each theme at both time points. Each provider could provide multiple responses. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Decisional Regret | Day of enrollment, after all evaluations are complete | Participants will report decision regret related to their treatment plans |
| Changes in Hip Strength | 4 weeks | Strength of hip abductors, adductors, flexors, extenders, internal and external rotators will be collected during maximal voluntary isometric contractions |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
No participants were excluded from the study before assignment to groups (interdisciplinary vs. standard)
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Interdisciplinary Evaluation Participants will receive an Interdisciplinary Evaluation for Nonarthritic Hip Disease from a hip arthroscopist, followed by an examination from a physical therapist, and then will participate in a shared decision-making process with both providers to determine a plan of care.
Interdisciplinary Evaluation for Nonarthritic Hip Disease: The hip arthroscopist will conduct his or her standard-care evaluation including subjective interview, patient history, imaging, and physical examination. The physical therapist will conduct an assessment of posture and movement during sitting, standing, squatting, and walking. After providers discuss their findings, they will discuss the plan of care with the participant. | 39 |
| Standard Evaluation Participants will receive a standard-of-care evaluation from a hip arthroscopist who will then determine the plan of care with the participant. | 39 |
| Total | 78 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinic Evaluation | Physician Decision | 15 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Clinic Evaluation | Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory Testing | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Laboratory Testing | Protocol Violation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Re-randomization for Treatment | Not appropriate | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Re-randomization for Treatment | Withdrawal by Subject | 25 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Interdisciplinary Evaluation | Standard Evaluation | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 36 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 | 41 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 | 38 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 |
| Decisional Conflict | 35.0 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.6 | 40.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.6 | 37.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.2 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 6 Participants | 3 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 5 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 28 Participants | 30 Participants | 58 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 39 participants | 39 participants | 78 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 28 Participants | 24 Participants | 52 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 11 Participants | 15 Participants | 26 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 39 | 0 / 39 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 39 | 0 / 39 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 39 | 0 / 39 |
Outcome results
Decisional Conflict
Participants will report decisional conflict related to their treatment plan. Decisional conflict was measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale ranging from 0 (no conflict, better outcome) to 100 (high conflict, worse outcome).
Time frame: Pre-evaluation, 10min Post-evaluation
Population: Participants from Period 1 (Clinic evaluation) were analyzed for this primary outcome measure based on interdisciplinary or standard evaluation. This outcome measure was not a planned outcome for Period 3 (Laboratory testing) and thus, values are not reported for posture and movement training, 3-week wait period, or observational groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interdisciplinary Evaluation | Decisional Conflict | Pre-evaluation decisional conflict | 35.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.6 |
| Interdisciplinary Evaluation | Decisional Conflict | Post-evaluation decisional conflict | 10.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.2 |
| Standard Evaluation | Decisional Conflict | Post-evaluation decisional conflict | 16.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.6 |
| Standard Evaluation | Decisional Conflict | Pre-evaluation decisional conflict | 40.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.6 |
Treatment Plan
Participants will indicate their planned treatment(s)
Time frame: Post-evaluation, same-day (approximately 5-10min after evaluation)
Population: Participants from Period 1 (Clinic evaluation) were analyzed for this primary outcome measure based on interdisciplinary or standard evaluation. This outcome measure was not a planned outcome for Period 3 (Laboratory testing) and thus, values are not reported for posture and movement training, 3-week wait period, or observational groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interdisciplinary Evaluation | Treatment Plan | Physical Therapy included in treatment plan | 26 Participants |
| Interdisciplinary Evaluation | Treatment Plan | Surgery included in treatment plan | 19 Participants |
| Interdisciplinary Evaluation | Treatment Plan | Injection included in treatment plan | 13 Participants |
| Standard Evaluation | Treatment Plan | Physical Therapy included in treatment plan | 19 Participants |
| Standard Evaluation | Treatment Plan | Surgery included in treatment plan | 19 Participants |
| Standard Evaluation | Treatment Plan | Injection included in treatment plan | 21 Participants |
Decisional Conflict
Participants will report decisional conflict related to their treatment plan. Decisional conflict was measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale ranging from 0 (no conflict, better outcome) to 100 (high conflict, worse outcome). Baseline scores for participants in Period 3 (Laboratory testing) were obtained from participants' post-evaluation surveys from Period 1 (clinic evaluation).
Time frame: 10min post-evaluation, 4-week laboratory visit
Population: Participants from Period 3 (Laboratory testing) were analyzed for this secondary outcome measure based on treatment group (Posture \& movement training, wait period, or observational). This outcome measure was not a planned follow-up outcome for Period 1 (Clinic evaluation) and thus, values are not reported for interdisciplinary and standard groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interdisciplinary Evaluation | Decisional Conflict | 4-week decisional conflict | 14.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.2 |
| Interdisciplinary Evaluation | Decisional Conflict | Post-evaluation decisional conflict | 13.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.3 |
| Standard Evaluation | Decisional Conflict | Post-evaluation decisional conflict | 14.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.9 |
| Standard Evaluation | Decisional Conflict | 4-week decisional conflict | 13.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.9 |
| Posture and Movement Training | Decisional Conflict | Post-evaluation decisional conflict | 0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Posture and Movement Training | Decisional Conflict | 4-week decisional conflict | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
Movement Mechanics
3-dimensional movement mechanics will be collected during functional tasks including walking and rising from a chair
Time frame: Baseline laboratory visit, 4-week laboratory visit
Population: Movement mechanics were not a planned variable for Period 1 (Clinic evaluation), but were a planned secondary variable for Period 3 (Laboratory testing). Collected data for the 7 participants who completed 4-week testing required extensive processing and resources that were not available due to loss of funding and personnel.
Participant Protocol Opinions
Participants will be interviewed to collect information on how they feel about the 1) evaluation protocol(s) and 2) treatment/wait period protocols.
Time frame: 20min post-evaluation, 4 weeks post-evaluation
Population: Data were not collected.
Patient-reported Hip Function
Participants will complete validated, reliable surveys for hip function (the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living \[HOSADL\] was used and is scored from 0-100 with 0 representing the worst function and 100 representing the best function). Baseline scores for participants in Period 3 (Laboratory testing) were obtained from participants' post-evaluation surveys from Period 1 (clinic evaluation).
Time frame: 10min post-evaluation, 4-week laboratory visit
Population: Participants from Period 3 (Laboratory testing) were analyzed for this secondary outcome measure based on treatment group (Posture \& movement training, wait period, or observational). This outcome measure was not a planned follow-up outcome for Period 1 (Clinic evaluation) and thus, values are not reported for interdisciplinary and standard groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interdisciplinary Evaluation | Patient-reported Hip Function | Post-evaluation HOSADL | 52.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.7 |
| Interdisciplinary Evaluation | Patient-reported Hip Function | 4-week HOSADL | 68.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20 |
| Standard Evaluation | Patient-reported Hip Function | Post-evaluation HOSADL | 72.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.8 |
| Standard Evaluation | Patient-reported Hip Function | 4-week HOSADL | 77.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.9 |
| Posture and Movement Training | Patient-reported Hip Function | Post-evaluation HOSADL | 89.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Posture and Movement Training | Patient-reported Hip Function | 4-week HOSADL | 92.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
Themes From Provider Interviews
Qualitative interviews will be conducted with study providers both before patient participant enrollment and after study completion to collect information on how they feel about the evaluation protocols. Qualitative analysis of this data will count responses based on themes. Data for this report will be provided as the total number of responses (across all providers) that fell within each theme at both time points. Each provider could provide multiple responses.
Time frame: Pre-enrollment (2-7days before patient participant recruitment began), Post-enrollment (1-7 days after patient participant recruitment ended)
Population: The orthopaedic surgeons (n=2) and one physical therapist (n=1) from the study were interviewed and number of responses during the interviews were totaled based on theme. Each provider could have multiple responses. These providers are not associated with a specific arm or group of patient participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interdisciplinary Evaluation | Themes From Provider Interviews | Implementation | 11 number of responses for each theme |
| Interdisciplinary Evaluation | Themes From Provider Interviews | Interdisciplinary Evaluation | 10 number of responses for each theme |
| Interdisciplinary Evaluation | Themes From Provider Interviews | Environment | 2 number of responses for each theme |
| Interdisciplinary Evaluation | Themes From Provider Interviews | Time | 6 number of responses for each theme |
| Interdisciplinary Evaluation | Themes From Provider Interviews | Patient Response | 12 number of responses for each theme |
| Interdisciplinary Evaluation | Themes From Provider Interviews | Clinical Reasoning | 7 number of responses for each theme |
| Standard Evaluation | Themes From Provider Interviews | Patient Response | 11 number of responses for each theme |
| Standard Evaluation | Themes From Provider Interviews | Implementation | 13 number of responses for each theme |
| Standard Evaluation | Themes From Provider Interviews | Time | 8 number of responses for each theme |
| Standard Evaluation | Themes From Provider Interviews | Interdisciplinary Evaluation | 13 number of responses for each theme |
| Standard Evaluation | Themes From Provider Interviews | Clinical Reasoning | 9 number of responses for each theme |
| Standard Evaluation | Themes From Provider Interviews | Environment | 5 number of responses for each theme |
Changes in Hip Strength
Strength of hip abductors, adductors, flexors, extenders, internal and external rotators will be collected during maximal voluntary isometric contractions
Time frame: 4 weeks
Decisional Regret
Participants will report decision regret related to their treatment plans
Time frame: Day of enrollment, after all evaluations are complete
Decisional Regret
Participants will report decision regret related to their treatment plans
Time frame: 4 weeks