Skip to content

Effectiveness and Safety of Intense Pulsed Light in Patients With Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Effectiveness and Safety of Intense Pulsed Light in Patients With Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03518398
Enrollment
114
Registered
2018-05-08
Start date
2018-07-03
Completion date
2019-04-02
Last updated
2019-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (Disorder), Dry Eye Syndromes

Keywords

Intense pulsed light, Meibomian gland dysfunction, Dry eye, cytokines

Brief summary

Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is one of the most common causes of dry eye diseases. Over the past decade, several treatment options in MGD have been extensively studied including warm compression, lid hygiene, ocular lubricants, forceful expression, LipiFlow thermal pulsation system, intraductal probing, debridement scaling and intense pulsed light (IPL). IPL is a broad spectrum, non-coherent and polychromatic light source with a wavelength spectrum of 500-1200 nm. It can be filtered to allow only a range of wavelengths to be emitted. Different wavelength makes different depth of tissue to absorb a specific light energy. Intense pulsed light (IPL) has been widely used in dermatology as a therapeutic tool for removal of hypertrichosis, benign cavernous hemangioma, benign venous malformations, telangiectasia, port-wine stain and pigmented lesions. Concurrent ocular surface improvements have been observed in patients undergone IPL treatment. Very few prospective clinical trials showed that subjective dry eye symptoms decreased and some of the dry eye signs also improved. Nonetheless, there is still inconsistency in the efficacy of IPL among these studies. Biomarkers, specifically cytokines, in dry eye diseases have been studied to some extent. Moreover, the change in ocular surface inflammatory cytokines in patients with MGD after IPL treatment is unclear. The investigators proposed a prospective randomized double-masked sham-controlled clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of intense pulse light in MGD patients.

Interventions

E\> Eye (E-SWIN, Paris, France) IPL machine

COMBINATION_PRODUCTStandard treatment

warm compression, lid scrub and non-preservative ocular lubricants

Sponsors

Chulalongkorn University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Able to read, understand and sign an informed consent form 2. 18-80 years of age 3. Fitzpatrick skin type 1-5 4. Able and willing to comply with the treatment /follow-up schedule and requirements 5. Presence of meibomian gland on each lower eyelid's meibography 6. Current diagnosis of stage1-4 of MGD in both eyes, according to the International Workshop on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: Report of the Subcommittee on Management and Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Exclusion criteria

1. Contact lens wearer within the past 1 month and throughout the study 2. Recent ocular surgery or eyelid surgery within the past 6 months 3. Neuro-paralysis in the planned treatment area within the past 6 months 4. Current use of punctual plugs 5. Pre-cancerous lesions, skin cancer or pigmented lesions in the planned treatment area 6. Uncontrolled infections or uncontrolled immunosuppressive diseases 7. Subjects who have undergone refractive surgery within the past 6 months 8. Diseases in the planned treatment area that could be stimulated by light at 560 nm to 1200 nm (e.g.,Herpes simplex 1 and 2, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, porphyria) 9. Use of photosensitive medications and/or herbs that may cause sensitivity to 560-1200 nm light exposure, such as isotretinoin, tetracycline, or St. John's Wort 10. Pregnancy and lactation 11. Radiation therapy to the head or neck within the past year, or planned radiation therapy throughout study period 12. Treatment with chemotherapeutic agent within the past 8 weeks, or planned chemotherapy throughout study period 13. Any condition revealed during the eligibility screening process whereby the physician deems the subject inappropriate for this study 14. Declared legally blind in one eye 15. IPL treatment within the past 12 months 16. Lipiflow treatment, or any equivalent treatments, within the past 12 months 17. Any anti-glaucomatous eye drop uses within the past 3 months and throughout the study period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in fluorescein tear break-up time at month 6 using fluorescein techniqueday 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6time elapsed from the last complete eyelid blink until appearance of the first dry spot on the cornea

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in lipid layer thickness at month 6 using LipiView interferometer (TearScience inc., Morrisville,NC)day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6quantitative values of the tear-film lipid layer depth or thickness by imaging the surface contour of the tear film, lipid layer thickness measurement
Change in Meibomian gland's anatomy by Meiboscore using Meibography at month 6 using Keratograph 5M (OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany)day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6directly visualising the morphology of meibomian glands in vivo
Change in ocular surface staining at month 6 using fluorescein staining techniqueday 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6fluorescein dye which is a mildly invasive stain that marks the tear film and defects in the corneal and conjunctival epithelium. The investigators use National Eye Institute (NEI) grading for ocular surface staining score in this study
Change in Meibomian gland expressibility at month 6 after applying the force onto the eyelids using meibomian gland evaluatorday 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6number of glands expressible after applying force onto the eyelids
Change in dry eye symptoms using Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), a questionnaire, at month 6day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6a 12-item questionnaire designed to provide a rapid assessment of the symptoms of ocular irritation consistent with dry eye disease and their impact on vision-related functioning.
Change in tear osmolarity at month 6 using TearLab Osmolarity System (San Diego, CA)day 0, 45, month 3, month 6concentration of the tear : The investigators use TearLab Osmolarity System (San Diego, CA)
Change in tear production test (Schirmer's test) at month 3 using calibrated strips of a non-toxic filter paperday 0, month 3is used determine whether the lacrimal glands produce enough tears to keep the eyes adequately moist
Change in tear cytokines Interleukins-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) at month 3 using Bio-Plex® 200 system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA)day 0, month 3one of the tear inflammatory cytokines
Change in tear cytokines Interleukins-6 at month 3 using Bio-Plex® 200 system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA)day 0, month 3one of the tear inflammatory cytokines
Change in Meibum quality at month 6 after applying the force onto the eyelids using meibomian gland evaluatorday 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6quality of the meibum content after applying the force onto the eyelids

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026