Skip to content

A Study of LY3303560 in Participants With Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease

Assessment of Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of LY3303560 in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03518073
Enrollment
360
Registered
2018-05-08
Start date
2018-04-30
Completion date
2021-10-25
Last updated
2022-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease (AD)

Keywords

Memory problems, Cognitive impairment, PERISCOPE-ALZ, Dementia, Tauopathy, Neurofibrillary tangles

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a study drug that targets an abnormal protein in the brain found in people with Alzheimer's Disease (AD).

Interventions

DRUGZagotenemab

Administered IV

DRUGPlacebo

Administered IV

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must have gradual and progressive change in memory function for \>6 months. * Participants must have a family member or close friend who is with you at least 10 hours per week and can attend study appointments.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants must not have significant neurological disease affecting the nervous system, other than AD, that affects cognition or may affect completion of the study. * Participants must not have serious or unstable illness that could interfere with the analysis of the study or has a life expectancy \<24 months. * Participants must not have history of cancer within the last 5 years with the exception of certain types of skin, cervical, prostate, and other cancers that are not likely to recur or spread. * Participants must not have serious risk for suicide. * Participants must not have history of drug or alcohol use disorder within the last 2 years. * Participants must not have multiple severe drug allergies * Participants must not have HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C * Participants must not be receiving gamma globulin (IgG) or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS)Baseline, Week 104Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) is a simple linear combination of scores from 13-item alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog13) and the Alzheimer's disease cooperative study-instrumental activities of daily living scale (ADCS-iADL). It is used to assess whether zagotenemab slows down the cognitive and functional decline associated with early symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease, compared to placebo. The iADRS score ranges from 0 to 144 with lower scores indicating worse performance and higher score better performance. Change from baseline was calculated using Bayesian disease progression model (DPM) with fixed, categorical effects of treatment, pooled site, acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) use at baseline (yes/no), and the continuous effects of baseline score and age at baseline. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale- Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) ScoreBaseline, Week 104The ADAS is a rater-administered instrument that was designed to assess the severity of the dysfunction in the cognitive and noncognitive behaviors characteristic of persons with Alzheimer's Disease (AD). The cognitive subscale of the ADAS consists of 13 items assessing areas of cognitive function most typically impaired in AD: orientation, verbal memory, language, praxis, delayed free recall, digit cancellation, and maze completion measures. The ADAS-Cog13 scale ranges from 0 to 85, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Change from baseline was calculated using Bayesian disease progression model (DPM) with fixed, categorical effects of treatment, pooled site, acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) use at baseline (yes/no), and the continuous effects of baseline score and age at baseline. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Change From Baseline on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) ScoreBaseline, Week 104CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning: memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Change from baseline was calculated using Bayesian disease progression model (DPM) with fixed, categorical effects of treatment, pooled site, acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) use at baseline (yes/no), and the continuous effects of baseline score and age at baseline. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Change From Baseline on the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) ScoreBaseline, Week 104The MMSE is a brief instrument used to assess cognitive function. The instrument is divided into 2 sections. The first section measures orientation, memory, and attention. The maximum score for the first section is 21. The second section tests the ability of the person to name objects, follow verbal and written commands, write a sentence, and copy figures. The maximum score for the second section is 9. The range for the total MMSE score is 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater level of impairment. Change from baseline was calculated using Bayesian disease progression model (DPM) with fixed, categorical effects of treatment, pooled site, acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) use at baseline (yes/no), and the continuous effects of baseline score and age at baseline. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-iADL) ScoreBaseline, Week 104The ADCS-ADL is a 23-item inventory developed as a rater-administered questionnaire answered by the participant's caregiver. The ADCS-ADL measures basic, instrumental activities of daily living by participants (instrumental activity items 6a, 7-23). The range for the ADCS-iADL is 0-59, with lower scores indicating greater disease severity. Change from baseline was calculated using Bayesian disease progression model (DPM) with fixed, categorical effects of treatment, pooled site, acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) use at baseline (yes/no), and the continuous effects of baseline score and age at baseline. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Change From Baseline in Brain Volume as Measured by Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI)Baseline, Week 104Alzheimer's disease is also associated with pronounced brain atrophy, reflecting bulk neurodegenerative loss of gray and white matter. Progression of brain atrophy is assessed by vMRI, providing regional quantification of volume loss. Negative change from baseline indicates greater disease severity. Change from baseline was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed, categorical effects of treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and continuous effect of baseline vMRI, baseline intracranial volume (ICV) and age.
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Baseline through Week 104C-SSRS is a scale capturing occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviours, and has a binary response (yes/no). * Suicidal Ideation: a yes answer to any one of 5 suicidal ideation questions: Wish to be Dead, Non-specific Active Suicidal Thoughts, Active Suicidal Ideation with Any Methods (Not Plan) without Intent to Act, Active Suicidal Ideation with Some Intent to Act without Specific Plan, Active Suicidal Ideation with Specific Plan and Intent. * Suicidal Behaviour: a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behaviour questions: Preparatory Acts or Behaviour, Aborted Attempt, Interrupted Attempt, Actual Attempt (non-fatal), Completed Suicide.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA) to ZagotenemabBaseline through Week 113A TE-ADA evaluable subject is considered to be TE-ADA positive: * If the subject has at least one post baseline titer that is a 4-fold or greater increase in titer from baseline measurement (treatment-boosted). * If baseline result is ADA Not Present, then the subject is TE ADA positive if there is at least one postbaseline result of ADA Present with titer \>= 1:10 (treatment-induced).
Change From Baseline in Brain Aggregated Tau Deposition as Measured by Flortaucipir F-18 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan.Baseline, Week 104Deposition of abnormal tau protein in the brain associated with AD was assessed by quantitative PET scan using flortaucipir F-18. Flortaucipir is an F-18-labeled small molecule that binds with high affinity and selectivity to aggregated tau, and provides a measure of aggregated tau deposition in the brain, expressed as flortaucipir standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr). Change from baseline was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed, categorical effects of treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and continuous effect of baseline SUVr and age. A positive change from baseline indicates increased aggregated tau deposition that is believed to be associated with a more rapid rate of cognitive deterioration.

Countries

Canada, Japan, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received IV infusion of placebo Q4W for 100 weeks.
118
Zagotenemab 1400 mg
Participants received IV infusion of 1400 mg zagotenemab Q4W for 100 weeks.
126
Zagotenemab 5600 mg
Participants received IV infusion of 5600 mg zagotenemab Q4W for 100 weeks.
116
Total360

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event242
Overall StudyCovid-19121
Overall StudyDeath213
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up101
Overall StudyPhysician Decision502
Overall StudyProgressive disease111
Overall StudyProtocol Violation100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject303429
Overall StudyWithdrawal Due To Caregiver Circumstances167

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicZagotenemab 1400 mgTotalPlaceboZagotenemab 5600 mg
Age, Continuous75.10 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.33
75.40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.33
75.30 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.22
75.70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.49
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants10 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
120 Participants342 Participants112 Participants110 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants8 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS)105.96 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.34
104.39 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
103.50 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.51
103.60 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.65
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
18 Participants53 Participants18 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants6 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
106 Participants300 Participants98 Participants96 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
15 Participants43 Participants15 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
17 Participants49 Participants15 Participants17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
94 Participants268 Participants88 Participants86 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
72 Participants190 Participants53 Participants65 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
54 Participants170 Participants65 Participants51 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 1181 / 1263 / 116
other
Total, other adverse events
61 / 11868 / 12671 / 116
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 11822 / 12619 / 116

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS)

Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) is a simple linear combination of scores from 13-item alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog13) and the Alzheimer's disease cooperative study-instrumental activities of daily living scale (ADCS-iADL). It is used to assess whether zagotenemab slows down the cognitive and functional decline associated with early symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease, compared to placebo. The iADRS score ranges from 0 to 144 with lower scores indicating worse performance and higher score better performance. Change from baseline was calculated using Bayesian disease progression model (DPM) with fixed, categorical effects of treatment, pooled site, acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) use at baseline (yes/no), and the continuous effects of baseline score and age at baseline. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 104

Population: All randomized participants with baseline, post-baseline iADRS data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS)-13.72 score on a scale
Zagotenemab 1400 mgChange From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS)-15.11 score on a scale
Zagotenemab 5600 mgChange From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS)-14.38 score on a scale
95% CI: [0.959, 1.265]
95% CI: [0.907, 1.209]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Brain Aggregated Tau Deposition as Measured by Flortaucipir F-18 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan.

Deposition of abnormal tau protein in the brain associated with AD was assessed by quantitative PET scan using flortaucipir F-18. Flortaucipir is an F-18-labeled small molecule that binds with high affinity and selectivity to aggregated tau, and provides a measure of aggregated tau deposition in the brain, expressed as flortaucipir standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr). Change from baseline was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed, categorical effects of treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and continuous effect of baseline SUVr and age. A positive change from baseline indicates increased aggregated tau deposition that is believed to be associated with a more rapid rate of cognitive deterioration.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 104

Population: All randomized participants with baseline, post-baseline PET tau data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brain Aggregated Tau Deposition as Measured by Flortaucipir F-18 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan.0.08 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Error 0.012
Zagotenemab 1400 mgChange From Baseline in Brain Aggregated Tau Deposition as Measured by Flortaucipir F-18 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan.0.10 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Error 0.011
Zagotenemab 5600 mgChange From Baseline in Brain Aggregated Tau Deposition as Measured by Flortaucipir F-18 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan.0.10 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Error 0.012
p-value: 0.25395% CI: [-0.01, 0.05]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.35495% CI: [-0.02, 0.05]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Brain Volume as Measured by Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI)

Alzheimer's disease is also associated with pronounced brain atrophy, reflecting bulk neurodegenerative loss of gray and white matter. Progression of brain atrophy is assessed by vMRI, providing regional quantification of volume loss. Negative change from baseline indicates greater disease severity. Change from baseline was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed, categorical effects of treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and continuous effect of baseline vMRI, baseline intracranial volume (ICV) and age.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 104

Population: All randomized participants with baseline, post-baseline vMRI brain volume data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brain Volume as Measured by Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI)-24.06 cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 1.101
Zagotenemab 1400 mgChange From Baseline in Brain Volume as Measured by Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI)-23.44 cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 1.095
Zagotenemab 5600 mgChange From Baseline in Brain Volume as Measured by Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (vMRI)-23.55 cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 1.158
p-value: 0.69195% CI: [-2.44, 3.68]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.74995% CI: [-2.64, 3.66]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale- Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) Score

The ADAS is a rater-administered instrument that was designed to assess the severity of the dysfunction in the cognitive and noncognitive behaviors characteristic of persons with Alzheimer's Disease (AD). The cognitive subscale of the ADAS consists of 13 items assessing areas of cognitive function most typically impaired in AD: orientation, verbal memory, language, praxis, delayed free recall, digit cancellation, and maze completion measures. The ADAS-Cog13 scale ranges from 0 to 85, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Change from baseline was calculated using Bayesian disease progression model (DPM) with fixed, categorical effects of treatment, pooled site, acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) use at baseline (yes/no), and the continuous effects of baseline score and age at baseline. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 104

Population: All randomized participants with baseline, post-baseline ADAS-Cog13 data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale- Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) Score7.13 score on a scale
Zagotenemab 1400 mgChange From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale- Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) Score7.85 score on a scale
Zagotenemab 5600 mgChange From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale- Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) Score6.30 score on a scale
95% CI: [0.943, 1.29]
95% CI: [0.737, 1.053]
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-iADL) Score

The ADCS-ADL is a 23-item inventory developed as a rater-administered questionnaire answered by the participant's caregiver. The ADCS-ADL measures basic, instrumental activities of daily living by participants (instrumental activity items 6a, 7-23). The range for the ADCS-iADL is 0-59, with lower scores indicating greater disease severity. Change from baseline was calculated using Bayesian disease progression model (DPM) with fixed, categorical effects of treatment, pooled site, acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) use at baseline (yes/no), and the continuous effects of baseline score and age at baseline. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 104

Population: All randomized participants with baseline, post-baseline ADCS-iADL data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-iADL) Score-6.67 score on a scale
Zagotenemab 1400 mgChange From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-iADL) Score-7.06 score on a scale
Zagotenemab 5600 mgChange From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-iADL) Score-8.05 score on a scale
95% CI: [0.873, 1.284]
95% CI: [1.006, 1.453]
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score

CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning: memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Change from baseline was calculated using Bayesian disease progression model (DPM) with fixed, categorical effects of treatment, pooled site, acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) use at baseline (yes/no), and the continuous effects of baseline score and age at baseline. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 104

Population: All randomized participants with baseline, post-baseline CDR-SB data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score2.26 score on a scale
Zagotenemab 1400 mgChange From Baseline on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score2.52 score on a scale
Zagotenemab 5600 mgChange From Baseline on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score2.14 score on a scale
95% CI: [0.963, 1.3]
95% CI: [0.805, 1.119]
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) Score

The MMSE is a brief instrument used to assess cognitive function. The instrument is divided into 2 sections. The first section measures orientation, memory, and attention. The maximum score for the first section is 21. The second section tests the ability of the person to name objects, follow verbal and written commands, write a sentence, and copy figures. The maximum score for the second section is 9. The range for the total MMSE score is 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater level of impairment. Change from baseline was calculated using Bayesian disease progression model (DPM) with fixed, categorical effects of treatment, pooled site, acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) use at baseline (yes/no), and the continuous effects of baseline score and age at baseline. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 104

Population: All randomized participants with baseline, post-baseline MMSE data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline on the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) Score-4.29 score on a scale
Zagotenemab 1400 mgChange From Baseline on the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) Score-4.44 score on a scale
Zagotenemab 5600 mgChange From Baseline on the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) Score-3.83 score on a scale
95% CI: [0.88, 1.221]
95% CI: [0.742, 1.065]
Secondary

Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS is a scale capturing occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviours, and has a binary response (yes/no). * Suicidal Ideation: a yes answer to any one of 5 suicidal ideation questions: Wish to be Dead, Non-specific Active Suicidal Thoughts, Active Suicidal Ideation with Any Methods (Not Plan) without Intent to Act, Active Suicidal Ideation with Some Intent to Act without Specific Plan, Active Suicidal Ideation with Specific Plan and Intent. * Suicidal Behaviour: a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behaviour questions: Preparatory Acts or Behaviour, Aborted Attempt, Interrupted Attempt, Actual Attempt (non-fatal), Completed Suicide.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 104

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had baseline, at least one post baseline C-SSRS assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal Ideation5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal Behaviour1 Participants
Zagotenemab 1400 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal Ideation5 Participants
Zagotenemab 1400 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal Behaviour2 Participants
Zagotenemab 5600 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal Ideation5 Participants
Zagotenemab 5600 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors Assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal Behaviour0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA) to Zagotenemab

A TE-ADA evaluable subject is considered to be TE-ADA positive: * If the subject has at least one post baseline titer that is a 4-fold or greater increase in titer from baseline measurement (treatment-boosted). * If baseline result is ADA Not Present, then the subject is TE ADA positive if there is at least one postbaseline result of ADA Present with titer \>= 1:10 (treatment-induced).

Time frame: Baseline through Week 113

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of zagotenemab and had baseline, at least one post baseline ADA assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA) to Zagotenemab2 Participants
Zagotenemab 1400 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA) to Zagotenemab1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026