Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ustekinumab in participants with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who have not adequately responded to one or more standard of care treatments.
Detailed description
This study evaluates the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ustekinumab in participants with active SLE according to Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score greater than (\>=) 6, despite receiving one or more standard-of-care treatments (example, immunomodulators, antimalarial drugs, and/or glucocorticoids). The total duration of the study is up to 182 weeks, consisting of 3 study periods: a screening period (approximately 6 weeks), a double blind period (52 weeks), and an extension period (124 weeks). Other study evaluations will include pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, biomarkers and pharmacogenomic evaluations. The safety of the participants enrolled in the study will be monitored on an ongoing basis throughout the study.
Interventions
Participants will receive placebo matching to ustekinumab IV or SC.
Participants will receive ustekinumab approximately 6 mg/kg via IV route based on body weight-range.
Participants will receive 90 mg ustekinumab via SC route.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Be male or female * Has a documented medical history (that is, met at least 1 of the two criteria below) that participant met the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at least 3 months prior to first dose of study agent: 1. Met a total of at least 4 SLICC criteria, including at least 1 clinical and at least 1 immunologic; 2. Has a diagnosis of lupus nephritis, confirmed by renal biopsy and at least 1 of the following autoantibodies: antinuclear antibodies (ANA) or anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (anti-dsDNA) * Has a positive test in the medical history and confirmed at screening for at least 1 of the following autoantibodies: antinuclear antibodies, anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid, and/or anti-Smith * Has greater than or equal to (\>=) 1 British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and/or \>= 2 BILAG B scores observed during screening * Has a Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) activity score \>=4 (excluding diffuse non-inflammatory alopecia) or \>= 4 joints with pain and signs of inflammation at screening, Week 0, or both * Has a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score \>=6 at screening. Must also have SLEDAI-2K \>= 4 for clinical features (excluding headache and laboratory abnormalities) at Week 0 * Cannot be pregnant, nursing, intending to become pregnant, or unwilling to follow contraception or egg/sperm donation guidelines * Must be receiving stable doses of \>=1 protocol-permitted standard of care SLE treatment: oral glucocorticoids, anti-malarials, immunomodulators (methotrexate, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, mycophenolate mofetil, mycophenolic acid)
Exclusion criteria
* Has any unstable or progressive SLE manifestation (example: central nervous system lupus, systemic vasculitis, end-stage renal disease, severe or rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, pulmonary hemorrhage, myocarditis) that may warrant escalation in therapy beyond permitted background medications. Participants requiring renal hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis are also excluded * Has other co-existent inflammatory diseases (example: rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease) * Has a urinary protein to creatinine ratio of greater than (\>)4 gram per gram (g/g) per day * Has an acute or chronic infectious illness (example: human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B or C virus, tuberculosis, opportunistic infections) * Has a history of cancer or lymphoproliferative disease within the last 5 years except for treated and non-recurrent cutaneous basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or cervical carcinoma * Has any condition requiring multiple courses of systemic glucocorticoids (example: uncontrolled asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) * Has a history of major surgery within the last month * Has received live virus or bacterial vaccines within 16 weeks prior to first dose of study agent or Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination within 12 months of screening * Has previously received ustekinumab * Has received cyclophosphamide orally within 90 days or intravenously within 180 days of screening * Has received a single B-cell targeted therapy (e.g. belimumab) within 3 months, \>1 previous B-cell targeted therapy within 6 months, or B-cell depleting therapy (example: rituximab) within 12 months of first dose of study agent * Has received protocol-prohibited oral or biologic immunomodulatory therapy in the last 3 months or less than (\<)5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to first dose of study agent * Has received adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) within 1 month prior to first dose of study agent * Has received epidural, intravenous, intramuscular, intraarticular, intrabursal, intralesional glucocorticoids within 6 weeks of first dose of study agent * Locally-delivered therapies except for ophthalmic use of cyclosporine A or topical use of nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), analgesics, or high-potency glucocorticoids (World Health Organization criteria) are prohibited
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Composite Response at Week 52 | Week 52 | SRI-4 response:\>=4-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A (severe disease) and no more than 1 new BILAG B (moderate disease) domain score and no worsening (\<10 % increase)from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment(PGA).SLEDAI measures disease activity in 9 organ systems,higher scores=more severe disease activity.Each organ system measured as either absent/present within last 30 days and weighted score across systems was utilized to calculate total SLEDAI score(range:0=no symptoms to 105=presence of all defined symptoms). Improvement is defined as reduction in SLEDAI score (BILAG) Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms,or laboratory parameters related to SLE,divided into 9 domains. Each domain can range from A=new domain activity, B=worse domain activity, C=same domain activity, D=improving domain activity to E=absence of domain activity. PGA assesses disease activity on visual analogue scale from very well(0)-very poor(10). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With an SRI-4 Composite Response at Week 24 | Week 24 | SRI-4 response:\>=4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no BILAG A (severe disease) and no more than 1 new BILAG B (moderate disease) domain score and no worsening (\<10 % increase)from baseline in PGA.SLEDAI measures disease activity in 9 organ systems, higher scores=more severe disease activity. Each organ system measured as either absent/present within last 30 days and weighted score across systems was utilized to calculate total SLEDAI score(range:0=no symptoms to 105=presence of all defined symptoms). Improvement is defined as reduction in SLEDAI score (BILAG) Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms,or laboratory parameters related to SLE,divided into 9 domains. Each domain can range from A=new domain activity, B=worse domain activity, C=same domain activity, D=improving domain activity to E=absence of domain activity. PGA assesses disease activity on visual analogue scale from very well(0)-very poor(10). |
| Percentage of Participants With 50 Percent (%) Improvement in Joints With Pain and Signs of Inflammation (Active Joints) at Week 52 | Week 52 | The percentage of participants who achieved at least 50% improvement from baseline in number of joints with pain and signs of inflammation at Week 52 for participants with at least 4 joints with pain and signs of inflammation at baseline were reported. |
| Time to First Flare | Up to Week 52 | Time to flare is defined as the time (in days) post baseline when the first flare occurs. It was calculated with flare defined as either 1 or more BILAG A (severe disease activity) or 2 or more new BILAG B (moderate disease activity) domain scores relative to baseline. BILAG was defined as a measure of alterations or intensification to therapy consisting of 97 questions in 9 domains. Each domain can range from A=new domain activity, B=worse domain activity, C=same domain activity, D=improving domain activity to E=absence of domain activity. BILAG A flare was defined as at least 1 new BILAG A scores. BILAG B flare was defined as at least 2 new BILAG B scores. |
| Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Improvement in the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 52 | Week 52 | Percentage of participants achieving at least 50% improvement in CLASI activity score at Week 52 reported in participants with a CLASI activity score of 4 or greater at baseline. The CLASI is an instrument to assess the disease activity and damage caused to the skin for cutaneous lupus erythematosus participants with or without systemic involvement. The CLASI activity score ranges from 0-70 with lower score being improved. Activity is scored based on erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss, and non-scarring alopecia. |
| Percentage of Participants Receiving Glucocorticoid at Baseline Who Achieved Change in Glucocorticoid Dose by Week 40, Sustained That Change Through Week 52, and Achieved an SRI-4 Composite Response at Week 52 | Up to Week 52 | Percentage of participants with reduction in glucocorticoid dose by Week 40, its sustenance through Week 52, and SRI 4 composite response at Week 52 were reported. Reduction of glucocorticoid dose was defined as reduction in average daily oral glucocorticoid dose by at least 50% (relative to baseline dose) or reduction of average daily oral glucocorticoid dose by at least 25% (relative to baseline dose) so that average daily dose is reduced to \<=7.5 mg (prednisone or equivalent). Sustained reduction of glucocorticoid dose was defined as achieving an average daily oral glucocorticoid dose reduction between Weeks 24 and 40, and sustaining that reduction through Week 52, in those participants who,at baseline,were receiving oral glucocorticoids. SRI-4 was defined as composite of at least 4-point improvement in SLEDAI-2K score of 0=no symptoms to 105=presence of all defined symptoms with higher scores representing increased disease activity),no worsening in BILAG and no worsening in PGA. |
| Percentage of Participants Receiving Glucocorticoid at Baseline Who Achieved Change in Glucocorticoid Dose by Week 40 and Sustain That Change Through Week 52 | Up to Week 52 | Reduction of glucocorticoid dose was defined as a reduction in average daily oral glucocorticoid dose by at least 50% (relative to the baseline dose) or reduction of average daily oral glucocorticoid dose by at least 25% (relative to the baseline dose) so that the average daily dose was reduced to less than or equal to (\<=) 7.5 milligram (mg) (prednisone or equivalent). Sustained reduction of glucocorticoid dose was defined as achieving an average daily oral glucocorticoid dose reduction between Weeks 24 and 40, and sustaining that reduction through Week 52, in those participants who, at baseline, were receiving oral glucocorticoids. |
Countries
Argentina, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Colombia, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Ukraine, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Participants received study drug up to Week 113, but were assessed for safety up to Week 130 (that is, after study termination).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo to Ustekinumab Participants received matching placebo to ustekinumab intravenously (IV) 6 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) based on body weight at Week 0 followed by matching placebo to ustekinumab subcutaneously (SC) 90 mg at Week 8 and every 8 weeks (q8w) thereafter through Week 48 during double-blind period. At Week 52, participants who entered the open-label extension period crossed over to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w through Week 113. | 208 |
| Ustekinumab Participants received ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV based on body weight (ustekinumab 260 mg \[weight less than or equal to {\<=} 55 kg\]; ustekinumab 390 mg \[weight greater than {\>} 55 kg and \<= 85 kg\] at Week 0 followed by ustekinumab 90 mg SC at Week 8 and q8w thereafter through Week 48 during double-blind period. At Week 52, participants who entered the open-label extension period continued to receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w through Week 113. | 308 |
| Total | 516 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Blind Period: Week 0-52 | Adverse Event | 9 | 11 |
| Double Blind Period: Week 0-52 | Death | 0 | 4 |
| Double Blind Period: Week 0-52 | Initiated prohibited medication | 0 | 2 |
| Double Blind Period: Week 0-52 | Lack of Efficacy | 2 | 3 |
| Double Blind Period: Week 0-52 | Other | 4 | 3 |
| Double Blind Period: Week 0-52 | Pregnancy | 0 | 1 |
| Double Blind Period: Week 0-52 | Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 |
| Double Blind Period: Week 0-52 | Study Terminated by Sponsor | 76 | 120 |
| Double Blind Period: Week 0-52 | Withdrawal by Subject | 11 | 11 |
| Open-label Extension Period: Week 52-113 | Adverse Event | 0 | 1 |
| Open-label Extension Period: Week 52-113 | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 1 |
| Open-label Extension Period: Week 52-113 | Study Terminated by Sponsor | 87 | 134 |
| Open-label Extension Period: Week 52-113 | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Placebo to Ustekinumab | Ustekinumab |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 27 Participants | 14 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 485 Participants | 191 Participants | 294 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 43.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.78 | 44.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.31 | 42.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.38 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 79 Participants | 34 Participants | 45 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 435 Participants | 172 Participants | 263 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 9 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 103 Participants | 46 Participants | 57 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 42 Participants | 18 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 15 Participants | 5 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 344 Participants | 136 Participants | 208 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment ARGENTINA | 28 Participants | 15 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment BULGARIA | 27 Participants | 11 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment CANADA | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment CHINA | 8 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment COLOMBIA | 17 Participants | 7 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment GERMANY | 19 Participants | 9 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment HUNGARY | 14 Participants | 3 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment JAPAN | 46 Participants | 21 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment LITHUANIA | 21 Participants | 10 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment POLAND | 38 Participants | 17 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment PORTUGAL | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment RUSSIAN FEDERATION | 30 Participants | 11 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment SERBIA | 42 Participants | 14 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment SOUTH AFRICA | 12 Participants | 4 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment SOUTH KOREA | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment SPAIN | 10 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment TAIWAN | 25 Participants | 11 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment THAILAND | 12 Participants | 7 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment UKRAINE | 30 Participants | 8 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment UNITED STATES | 129 Participants | 52 Participants | 77 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 482 Participants | 191 Participants | 291 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 34 Participants | 17 Participants | 17 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 208 | 0 / 88 | 5 / 307 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 60 / 208 | 3 / 88 | 79 / 307 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 28 / 208 | 5 / 88 | 44 / 307 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Composite Response at Week 52
SRI-4 response:\>=4-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A (severe disease) and no more than 1 new BILAG B (moderate disease) domain score and no worsening (\<10 % increase)from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment(PGA).SLEDAI measures disease activity in 9 organ systems,higher scores=more severe disease activity.Each organ system measured as either absent/present within last 30 days and weighted score across systems was utilized to calculate total SLEDAI score(range:0=no symptoms to 105=presence of all defined symptoms). Improvement is defined as reduction in SLEDAI score (BILAG) Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms,or laboratory parameters related to SLE,divided into 9 domains. Each domain can range from A=new domain activity, B=worse domain activity, C=same domain activity, D=improving domain activity to E=absence of domain activity. PGA assesses disease activity on visual analogue scale from very well(0)-very poor(10).
Time frame: Week 52
Population: The projected full analysis set (FAS) was defined as those participants (participants who received at least 1 dose \[partial or complete,intravenous \[IV\] or subcutaneous \[SC\] of study agent) who should have had a given visit based upon their latest scheduled study visit. Participants were set to non-responders if they met treatment failure (TF) or had data missing.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo to Ustekinumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Composite Response at Week 52 | 56.0 percentage of participants |
| Ustekinumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) Composite Response at Week 52 | 43.9 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Receiving Glucocorticoid at Baseline Who Achieved Change in Glucocorticoid Dose by Week 40 and Sustain That Change Through Week 52
Reduction of glucocorticoid dose was defined as a reduction in average daily oral glucocorticoid dose by at least 50% (relative to the baseline dose) or reduction of average daily oral glucocorticoid dose by at least 25% (relative to the baseline dose) so that the average daily dose was reduced to less than or equal to (\<=) 7.5 milligram (mg) (prednisone or equivalent). Sustained reduction of glucocorticoid dose was defined as achieving an average daily oral glucocorticoid dose reduction between Weeks 24 and 40, and sustaining that reduction through Week 52, in those participants who, at baseline, were receiving oral glucocorticoids.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: Analysis population is projected analysis set which included participants who received glucocorticoids at baseline. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) refers to participants evaluable including participants who had or should have had a Week 52 visit based upon their last scheduled visit and the date of trial termination. Participants were set to non-responders if they met TF or had data missing.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo to Ustekinumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Glucocorticoid at Baseline Who Achieved Change in Glucocorticoid Dose by Week 40 and Sustain That Change Through Week 52 | 29.3 percentage of participants |
| Ustekinumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Glucocorticoid at Baseline Who Achieved Change in Glucocorticoid Dose by Week 40 and Sustain That Change Through Week 52 | 44.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Receiving Glucocorticoid at Baseline Who Achieved Change in Glucocorticoid Dose by Week 40, Sustained That Change Through Week 52, and Achieved an SRI-4 Composite Response at Week 52
Percentage of participants with reduction in glucocorticoid dose by Week 40, its sustenance through Week 52, and SRI 4 composite response at Week 52 were reported. Reduction of glucocorticoid dose was defined as reduction in average daily oral glucocorticoid dose by at least 50% (relative to baseline dose) or reduction of average daily oral glucocorticoid dose by at least 25% (relative to baseline dose) so that average daily dose is reduced to \<=7.5 mg (prednisone or equivalent). Sustained reduction of glucocorticoid dose was defined as achieving an average daily oral glucocorticoid dose reduction between Weeks 24 and 40, and sustaining that reduction through Week 52, in those participants who,at baseline,were receiving oral glucocorticoids. SRI-4 was defined as composite of at least 4-point improvement in SLEDAI-2K score of 0=no symptoms to 105=presence of all defined symptoms with higher scores representing increased disease activity),no worsening in BILAG and no worsening in PGA.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: Analysis population is projected analysis set which included participants who received glucocorticoids at baseline. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) refers to participants evaluable included participants who had or should have had a Week 52 visit based upon their last scheduled visit and the date of trial termination. Participants were set to non-responders if they met TF or had data missing.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo to Ustekinumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Glucocorticoid at Baseline Who Achieved Change in Glucocorticoid Dose by Week 40, Sustained That Change Through Week 52, and Achieved an SRI-4 Composite Response at Week 52 | 23.9 percentage of participants |
| Ustekinumab | Percentage of Participants Receiving Glucocorticoid at Baseline Who Achieved Change in Glucocorticoid Dose by Week 40, Sustained That Change Through Week 52, and Achieved an SRI-4 Composite Response at Week 52 | 30.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With 50 Percent (%) Improvement in Joints With Pain and Signs of Inflammation (Active Joints) at Week 52
The percentage of participants who achieved at least 50% improvement from baseline in number of joints with pain and signs of inflammation at Week 52 for participants with at least 4 joints with pain and signs of inflammation at baseline were reported.
Time frame: Week 52
Population: Analysis population is projected analysis set which included participants who had at least 4 joints with pain and signs of inflammation at baseline. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) refers to participants evaluable included participants who had or should have had a Week 52 visit based upon their last scheduled visit and the date of trial termination.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo to Ustekinumab | Percentage of Participants With 50 Percent (%) Improvement in Joints With Pain and Signs of Inflammation (Active Joints) at Week 52 | 66.3 percentage of participants |
| Ustekinumab | Percentage of Participants With 50 Percent (%) Improvement in Joints With Pain and Signs of Inflammation (Active Joints) at Week 52 | 64.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With an SRI-4 Composite Response at Week 24
SRI-4 response:\>=4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no BILAG A (severe disease) and no more than 1 new BILAG B (moderate disease) domain score and no worsening (\<10 % increase)from baseline in PGA.SLEDAI measures disease activity in 9 organ systems, higher scores=more severe disease activity. Each organ system measured as either absent/present within last 30 days and weighted score across systems was utilized to calculate total SLEDAI score(range:0=no symptoms to 105=presence of all defined symptoms). Improvement is defined as reduction in SLEDAI score (BILAG) Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms,or laboratory parameters related to SLE,divided into 9 domains. Each domain can range from A=new domain activity, B=worse domain activity, C=same domain activity, D=improving domain activity to E=absence of domain activity. PGA assesses disease activity on visual analogue scale from very well(0)-very poor(10).
Time frame: Week 24
Population: Population analyzed included projected analysis set among participants who had or should have had a Week 24 visit based upon their last scheduled visit.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo to Ustekinumab | Percentage of Participants With an SRI-4 Composite Response at Week 24 | 56 percentage of participants |
| Ustekinumab | Percentage of Participants With an SRI-4 Composite Response at Week 24 | 45.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Improvement in the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving at least 50% improvement in CLASI activity score at Week 52 reported in participants with a CLASI activity score of 4 or greater at baseline. The CLASI is an instrument to assess the disease activity and damage caused to the skin for cutaneous lupus erythematosus participants with or without systemic involvement. The CLASI activity score ranges from 0-70 with lower score being improved. Activity is scored based on erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss, and non-scarring alopecia.
Time frame: Week 52
Population: Analysis population is projected FAS. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) refers to participants who had or should have had a Week 52 visit based upon their last scheduled visit and the date of trial termination and with a CLASI activity score of 4 or greater at baseline. Participants were set to non-responders if they met TF or had data missing.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo to Ustekinumab | Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Improvement in the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 52 | 55.9 percentage of participants |
| Ustekinumab | Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Improvement in the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score at Week 52 | 40.7 percentage of participants |
Time to First Flare
Time to flare is defined as the time (in days) post baseline when the first flare occurs. It was calculated with flare defined as either 1 or more BILAG A (severe disease activity) or 2 or more new BILAG B (moderate disease activity) domain scores relative to baseline. BILAG was defined as a measure of alterations or intensification to therapy consisting of 97 questions in 9 domains. Each domain can range from A=new domain activity, B=worse domain activity, C=same domain activity, D=improving domain activity to E=absence of domain activity. BILAG A flare was defined as at least 1 new BILAG A scores. BILAG B flare was defined as at least 2 new BILAG B scores.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Population: Analysis population is projected FAS. Participants were set to have flare if they met TF criteria (exceeded baseline dose of permitted SLE medications, initiated a new permitted SLE medication, initiated new protocol-prohibited medication or discontinued study agent for any reason prior to Week 52).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo to Ustekinumab | Time to First Flare | Time to First BILAG Flare | 200.4 days | Standard Deviation 121.27 |
| Placebo to Ustekinumab | Time to First Flare | Time to First BILAG A Flare | 201.4 days | Standard Deviation 122.83 |
| Placebo to Ustekinumab | Time to First Flare | Time to First BILAG B Flare | 218.1 days | Standard Deviation 125 |
| Ustekinumab | Time to First Flare | Time to First BILAG Flare | 204.7 days | Standard Deviation 107.82 |
| Ustekinumab | Time to First Flare | Time to First BILAG A Flare | 203.1 days | Standard Deviation 108.37 |
| Ustekinumab | Time to First Flare | Time to First BILAG B Flare | 208.7 days | Standard Deviation 107.51 |