Atopic Dermatitis
Conditions
Keywords
atopic dermatitis, AD, eczema, atopic eczema, itch, pruritus, histamine 4 receptor, antagonist, H4R, ZPL389, ZPL389A2203, dermatitis
Brief summary
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to assess safety and efficacy of ZPL389 in subjects with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis with a total study duration up to 24 weeks
Detailed description
A screening period of up to 4 weeks was followed by a 16-week double blinded treatment period. After the end of treatment visit, subjects were offered the possibility of ongoing treatment in the extension study (CZPL389A2203E1/ NCT03948334), or of entering the 4 week treatment-free follow-up period.
Interventions
once daily from baseline until week 16
ZPL389 3 mg oral powder; once daily from baseline to week 16
ZPL389 10 mg oral powder; once daily from baseline to week 16
ZPL389 30 mg oral powder; once daily from baseline to week 16
ZPL389 50 mg oral powder; once daily from baseline to week 16
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subjects must give a written, signed and dated informed consent * Chronic atopic dermatitis present for at least 1 year before Baseline * Moderate to severe atopic dermatitis defined as per EASI, IGA and BSA. * Documented recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to treatment with topical medications or for whom topical treatments are otherwise medically inadvisable * Candidate for systemic treatment
Exclusion criteria
* Any skin disease that would confound the diagnosis or evaluation of atopic dermatitis disease activity * Use of other investigational drugs within 5 half-lives of enrollment, or within 30 days or until the expected pharmacodynamic effect has returned to baseline, whichever is longer. * History of hypersensitivity to any of the study drug constituents or to drugs of similar chemical classes. * Participation in prior ZPL389 studies
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of IGA Responders at Week 16 | Week 16 | Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score is used to determine the severity of atopic dermatitis symptoms and clinical response to treatment. It reflects a subject's overall disease severity for the whole body. The scale includes 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe. It is a static scale and does not refer to previous status of the subject. IGA response is defined as achievement of an IGA score of 0 or 1 with a 2-point reduction from baseline without use of confounding therapy (e.g. rescue medication) up to the assessment time point. Treatment discontinuations for lack of efficacy or adverse event are considered non-responders. Percentage of responders was calculated based on a logistic regression model with response as outcome variable and treatment (dose as categorical variable) and baseline IGA as covariates. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12 | Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is used to assess the extend and severity of atopic dermatitis on a scale from 0 to 72 where 72 is worst eczema. |
| Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16 | Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is used to assess the extend and severity of atopic dermatitis on a scale from 0 to 72 where 72 is worst eczema. EASI50 response is defined as achieving ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) in EASI score compared to baseline without use of confounding therapy (e.g. rescue medication) up to the assessment time point. Treatment discontinuations for lack of efficacy or adverse event are considered non-responders. Percentage of responders was calculated based on a logistic regression model with response as outcome variable and treatment (dose as categorical variable) and baseline EASI as covariates |
| Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16 | Baseline, Week 16 | Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is used to assess the extend and severity of atopic dermatitis on a scale from 0 to 72 where 72 is worst eczema. |
| Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12 | Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score is used to determine the severity of atopic dermatitis symptoms and clinical response to treatment. It reflects a subject's overall disease severity for the whole body. The scale includes 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe. It is a static scale and does not refer to previous status of the subject. IGA response is defined as achievement of an IGA score of 0 or 1 with a 2-point reduction from baseline without use of confounding therapy (e.g. rescue medication) up to the assessment time point. Treatment discontinuations for lack of efficacy or adverse event are considered non-responders. Percentage of responders was calculated based on a logistic regression model with response as outcome variable and treatment (dose as categorical variable) and baseline IGA as covariates. |
| Number of Patients With Adverse Events | Up to week 20 | An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g., any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject after providing written informed consent for participation in the study until the end of study visit. Therefore, an AE may or may not be temporally or causally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product. |
| Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16 | Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is used to assess the extend and severity of atopic dermatitis on a scale from 0 to 72 where 72 is worst eczema. EASI75 response is defined as achieving ≥ 75% improvement (reduction) in EASI score compared to baseline without use of confounding therapy (e.g. rescue medication) up to the assessment time point. Treatment discontinuations for lack of efficacy or adverse event are considered non-responders. Percentage of responders was calculated based on a logistic regression model with response as outcome variable and treatment (dose as categorical variable) and baseline EASI as covariates |
Countries
Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
There were 293 subjects randomized at baseline to one of the five treatment arms. Two mis-randomized subjects in the placebo arm were excluded from the baseline analysis population.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Placebo | 72 |
| ZPL389 3mg ZPL389 3 mg oral powder | 37 |
| ZPL389 10 mg ZPL389 10 mg oral powder | 36 |
| ZPL389 30mg ZPL389 30 mg oral powder | 73 |
| ZPL389 50mg ZPL389 50 mg oral powder | 73 |
| Total | 291 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 5 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Pregnancy | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Deviation | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Study terminated by Sponsor | 11 | 5 | 6 | 14 | 12 |
| Overall Study | Subject Decision /Guardian Decision | 9 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 8 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | ZPL389 3mg | ZPL389 10 mg | ZPL389 30mg | ZPL389 50mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 34.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.79 | 38.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.86 | 32.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.93 | 34.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.69 | 35.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.91 | 35.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.87 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 21 Participants | 11 Participants | 9 Participants | 15 Participants | 17 Participants | 73 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Multiple | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 51 Participants | 26 Participants | 24 Participants | 55 Participants | 52 Participants | 208 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 34 Participants | 17 Participants | 17 Participants | 32 Participants | 25 Participants | 125 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 38 Participants | 20 Participants | 19 Participants | 41 Participants | 48 Participants | 166 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 72 | 0 / 37 | 0 / 36 | 0 / 73 | 0 / 73 | 0 / 291 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 27 / 72 | 14 / 37 | 8 / 36 | 30 / 73 | 26 / 73 | 105 / 291 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 2 / 72 | 1 / 37 | 3 / 36 | 1 / 73 | 3 / 73 | 10 / 291 |
Outcome results
Percentage of IGA Responders at Week 16
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score is used to determine the severity of atopic dermatitis symptoms and clinical response to treatment. It reflects a subject's overall disease severity for the whole body. The scale includes 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe. It is a static scale and does not refer to previous status of the subject. IGA response is defined as achievement of an IGA score of 0 or 1 with a 2-point reduction from baseline without use of confounding therapy (e.g. rescue medication) up to the assessment time point. Treatment discontinuations for lack of efficacy or adverse event are considered non-responders. Percentage of responders was calculated based on a logistic regression model with response as outcome variable and treatment (dose as categorical variable) and baseline IGA as covariates.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) comprised all subjects who were randomized and to whom study treatment had been assigned. Mis-randomized subjects (mis-randomized in IRT) were excluded from the FAS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of IGA Responders at Week 16 | 1.9 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of IGA Responders at Week 16 | 3.3 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of IGA Responders at Week 16 | 7.2 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of IGA Responders at Week 16 | 0.8 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of IGA Responders at Week 16 | 6.9 Percentage of participants |
Number of Patients With Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g., any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject after providing written informed consent for participation in the study until the end of study visit. Therefore, an AE may or may not be temporally or causally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product.
Time frame: Up to week 20
Population: Safety Set included all subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. Subjects were analyzed according to treatment received. The safety analyses were based on safety sets (SAF).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Patients With Adverse Events | AEs leading to discontinuation | 7 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Patients With Adverse Events | SAE | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Patients With Adverse Events | AE | 44 Participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Number of Patients With Adverse Events | SAE | 1 Participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Number of Patients With Adverse Events | AE | 22 Participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Number of Patients With Adverse Events | AEs leading to discontinuation | 3 Participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Number of Patients With Adverse Events | AEs leading to discontinuation | 2 Participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Number of Patients With Adverse Events | AE | 18 Participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Number of Patients With Adverse Events | SAE | 3 Participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Number of Patients With Adverse Events | AEs leading to discontinuation | 11 Participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Number of Patients With Adverse Events | AE | 48 Participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Number of Patients With Adverse Events | SAE | 1 Participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Number of Patients With Adverse Events | AE | 43 Participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Number of Patients With Adverse Events | SAE | 3 Participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Number of Patients With Adverse Events | AEs leading to discontinuation | 12 Participants |
Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time
Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is used to assess the extend and severity of atopic dermatitis on a scale from 0 to 72 where 72 is worst eczema. EASI50 response is defined as achieving ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) in EASI score compared to baseline without use of confounding therapy (e.g. rescue medication) up to the assessment time point. Treatment discontinuations for lack of efficacy or adverse event are considered non-responders. Percentage of responders was calculated based on a logistic regression model with response as outcome variable and treatment (dose as categorical variable) and baseline EASI as covariates
Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) comprised all subjects who were randomized and to whom study treatment had been assigned. Mis-randomized subjects (mis-randomized in IRT) were excluded from the FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | Week 2 | 7.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 4 | 13.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 6 | 18.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 8 | 18.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 12 | 20.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 16 | 16.8 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 12 | 11.4 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 16 | 14.4 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | Week 2 | 15.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 6 | 15.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 8 | 18.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 4 | 19.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 8 | 16.4 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 12 | 20.3 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | Week 2 | 12.6 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 6 | 15.1 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 4 | 20.1 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 16 | 22.7 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 8 | 9.4 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 4 | 9.5 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 6 | 9.5 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 16 | 12.1 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 12 | 12.6 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | Week 2 | 5.8 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 12 | 12.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 6 | 16.7 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 4 | 20.7 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 16 | 12.7 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | week 8 | 12.8 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of EASI50 Responders Over Time | Week 2 | 10.1 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time
Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is used to assess the extend and severity of atopic dermatitis on a scale from 0 to 72 where 72 is worst eczema. EASI75 response is defined as achieving ≥ 75% improvement (reduction) in EASI score compared to baseline without use of confounding therapy (e.g. rescue medication) up to the assessment time point. Treatment discontinuations for lack of efficacy or adverse event are considered non-responders. Percentage of responders was calculated based on a logistic regression model with response as outcome variable and treatment (dose as categorical variable) and baseline EASI as covariates
Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) comprised all subjects who were randomized and to whom study treatment had been assigned. Mis-randomized subjects (mis-randomized in IRT) were excluded from the FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 2 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 4 | 2.8 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 6 | 5.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 8 | 6.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 12 | 4.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 16 | 9.7 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 12 | 6.2 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 16 | 7.1 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 2 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 6 | 10.3 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 8 | 10.9 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 4 | 7.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 8 | 8.5 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 12 | 10.6 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 2 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 6 | 7.1 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 4 | 1.7 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 16 | 12.9 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 8 | 2.5 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 4 | 1.8 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 6 | 1.8 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 16 | 3.1 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 12 | 2.8 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 2 | 1.4 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 12 | 5.8 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 6 | 7.4 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 4 | 1.4 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 16 | 9.3 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 8 | 6.1 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of EASI75 Responders Over Time | week 2 | 1.5 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score is used to determine the severity of atopic dermatitis symptoms and clinical response to treatment. It reflects a subject's overall disease severity for the whole body. The scale includes 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe. It is a static scale and does not refer to previous status of the subject. IGA response is defined as achievement of an IGA score of 0 or 1 with a 2-point reduction from baseline without use of confounding therapy (e.g. rescue medication) up to the assessment time point. Treatment discontinuations for lack of efficacy or adverse event are considered non-responders. Percentage of responders was calculated based on a logistic regression model with response as outcome variable and treatment (dose as categorical variable) and baseline IGA as covariates.
Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) comprised all subjects who were randomized and to whom study treatment had been assigned. Mis-randomized subjects (mis-randomized in IRT) were excluded from the FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 8 | 1.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 2 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 12 | 1.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 4 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 6 | 1.4 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 8 | 3.8 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 6 | 6.1 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 4 | 2.8 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 12 | 4.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 2 | 2.7 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 6 | 5.9 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 2 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 4 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 8 | 6.5 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 12 | 5.6 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 12 | 1.9 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 2 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 8 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 6 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 4 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 6 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 8 | 2.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 2 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 12 | 1.0 Percentage of participants |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percentage of IGA Responders Over Time | week 4 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16
Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is used to assess the extend and severity of atopic dermatitis on a scale from 0 to 72 where 72 is worst eczema.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) comprised all subjects who were randomized and to whom study treatment had been assigned. Mis-randomized subjects (mis-randomized in IRT) were excluded from the FAS
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16 | -55.0 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16 | -49.4 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16 | -50.7 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16 | -46.2 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16 | -52.7 Percent change from baseline |
Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time
Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is used to assess the extend and severity of atopic dermatitis on a scale from 0 to 72 where 72 is worst eczema.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) comprised all subjects who were randomized and to whom study treatment had been assigned. Mis-randomized subjects (mis-randomized in IRT) were excluded from the FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 6 | -42.8 Percent change from baseline |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 4 | -19.7 Percent change from baseline |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | Week 2 | -17.1 Percent change from baseline |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 8 | -49.3 Percent change from baseline |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 12 | -55.4 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 6 | -47.6 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | Week 2 | -20.1 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 4 | -36.1 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 8 | -50.1 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 3mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 12 | -48.7 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 12 | -54.1 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | Week 2 | -10.3 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 6 | -43.2 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 8 | -47.4 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 10 mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 4 | -25.6 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 4 | -17.7 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | Week 2 | -14.2 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 6 | -33.2 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 12 | -45.1 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 30mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 8 | -38.1 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 8 | -45.5 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 12 | -52.7 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 6 | -43.5 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | Week 2 | -16.7 Percent change from baseline |
| ZPL389 50mg | Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Over Time | week 4 | -30.0 Percent change from baseline |