Skip to content

Ketamine's Efficiency in the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Kynurenin Pathway

Ketamine's Efficiency in the Treatment of Chronic Pain With an Added Inflammatory Component Exploring the Kynurenin Pathway. A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03513822
Acronym
KEKU1
Enrollment
48
Registered
2018-05-02
Start date
2018-02-16
Completion date
2018-11-30
Last updated
2018-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain, Inflammation, Neuralgia

Keywords

KETAMINE, CHRONIC PAIN, NEUROPATHIC PAIN, KYNURENINE, KYNURENINE PATHWAY, BEDSORES, ANTI-INFLAMMATORY, ULCER PRESSURE

Brief summary

The kynurenine pathway is involved in hyperalgesia. This pathway is activated by inflammation. Ketamine would interact with the kynurenine pathway and inflammation. Our working hypotheses are: the clinical effects of ketamine on neuropathic pain are greater in the presence of systemic inflammation and the mechanism of action involves an interaction on the kynurenine pathway. Study design: Interventional randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Main goals: 1. To show a better clinical efficacy of ketamine in chronic pain in patients with an inflammatory component. 2. Explore the anti-inflammatory activity of ketamine through the Kynurenine pathway.

Detailed description

The kynurenine pathway is involved in hyperalgesia. This pathway is activated by inflammation. Ketamine would interact with the kynurenine pathway and inflammation. Our working hypotheses are: the clinical effects of ketamine on neuropathic pain are greater in the presence of systemic inflammation and the mechanism of action involves an interaction on the kynurenine pathway. Study design: Interventional randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Main goals: 1. To show a better clinical efficacy of ketamine in chronic pain in patients with an inflammatory component. 2. Explore the anti-inflammatory activity of ketamine through the Kynurenine pathway. Population Adult, medullary injured (BM), with chronic neuropathic pain (DN). 4 groups: BM with DN with bedsore Ketamine Group versus Placebo Group BM with DN without bedsore group Ketamine versus Placebo Group Intervention Ketamine infusion 1 mg / kg IVSE over two hours versus Nacl perfusion 0.9%  Primary judgment criterion Decrease by more than 30% the intensity of neuropathic pain evaluated at the moment on a numerical scale of 10 points between H0 and H4. Comparison of groups two by two. Secondary judgment criterions: NPSI score (Neuropathic pain symptom inventory) at H1, H4, D1, D4, J7 Sub score of NPSI; H1, H4, J1, J4, J7 Depression Scale HADS (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale) J0, J1, J7 Plasma serotonin (5-HT) kynurenine (KYN), indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) activity (KYN / TRP ratio), kynurenic acid ( KA) and quinolinic acid (QA), as well as 3 proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α before perfusion and H4 perfusion. In parallel blood samples will be collected to study the activation of the kynurenine pathway in response to inflammation due to a pressure ulcer.

Interventions

DRUGKetamine 10 MG/ML

Ketamine infusion 1mg/kg with electric syringe during 2 hours.

DRUGPlacebos

Sodium chloride infusion with the same rate, electric syringe during 2 hours.

DRUGMidazolam 1 MG/ML

Bolus of Midazolam 1mg before each perfusion.

Sponsors

Hôpital Raymond Poincaré
CollaboratorOTHER
Hopital Lariboisière
CollaboratorOTHER
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Fondation Apicil
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Ambroise Paré Paris
CollaboratorOTHER
Recherche Clinique Paris Descartes Necker Cochin Sainte Anne
CollaboratorOTHER
Redar
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The randomisation is done with R software. Each randomisation card is put in a sealed opaque envelope. The two products being transparent, it's impossible to differentiate the two products with identical packaging is a syringe of 50 cc Luer Lock Plastipack BD with a standard extension for syringe Luer Lock. Both products will be prepared by an SSPI nurse who opens the envelope, the nurse does not participate in the study, the patient assessment investigator as well as the patient will remain blind about the administration of the product. Each syringe will be labeled for each patient with a special label without indication of the product The outcomes assessor, investigator and participant are blinded.

Intervention model description

Interventional randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Adult, medullary injured (BM), with chronic neuropathic pain (DN). 4 groups: BM with DN with bedsore Ketamine Group versus Placebo Group BM with DN without bedsore group Ketamine versus Placebo Group Ketamine infusion 1 mg / kg IVSE over two hours versus Nacl perfusion 0.9%

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults speaking and understanding French * presenting chronic neuropathic pain as defined by IASP * Painful intensity\> or = to 6/10 during the week preceding the inclusion - Medullary lesion, whatever the origin (traumatic, degenerative, tumoral, postoperative), responsible for paraplegia in a chronic state. * Able to give informed consent, after clear, fair and appropriate information * Having given their consent by a written consent signature.

Exclusion criteria

* Hypersensitivity to ketamine or any of its components * Participation in another interventional trial, or participation in another trial. * Patient unable to give consent. * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Refusal to sign the consent * Cardiovascular diseases associated in particular with disorders of rhythm and severe cardiac insufficiency, coronary insufficiency, discovered on examination, on ECG or by biological balance or known. - unstabilized HTA\> 180/100 mmHg * Severe hepatic and / or renal hepatic insufficiency.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric pain rating scale decrease between H0 and H4.4 hours after the end of infusionNumeric pain rating scale is a scale from 0 to 10. 0 is no pain, 10 is the worst pain we could imagine. The first outcome is decreasing the intensity of neuropathic pain evaluated at the moment on a numerical scale of 10 points at H4. Comparison of groups two by two.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Paraclinical: Kynurenine pathway levels : SEROTONINHour 0 and Hour 6 (4 hours after the ending of infusion)Levels of SEROTONIN (millimoles/liter)
Paraclinical: Kynurenine pathway levels : KYNURENINEHour 0 and Hour 6 (4 hours after the ending of infusion)Levels of KYNURENINE (millimoles/liter)
Paraclinical: Kynurenine pathway levels : IDO ACTIVITYHour 0 and Hour 6 (4 hours after the ending of infusion)Levels of INDOLEAMINE DIOXYGENASE ACTIVITY (division Kynurenine/Tryptophane quote)
Paraclinical: Kynurenine pathway levels : KYNURENIC ACIDHour 0 and Hour 6 (4 hours after the ending of infusion)Levels of Kynurenic acid (millimoles/liter)
Paraclinical: Kynurenine pathway levels : QUINOLINIC ACIDHour 0 and Hour 6 (4 hours after the ending of infusion)Levels of Quinolinic acid (millimoles/liter)
Paraclinical: Kynurenine pathway levels : IL1Hour 0 and Hour 6 (4 hours after the ending of infusion)Levels of Interleukin 1 (picograms/milliliter)
Paraclinical: Kynurenine pathway levels : IL6Hour 0 and Hour 6 (4 hours after the ending of infusion)Levels of Interleukin 6 (picograms/milliliter)
Paraclinical: Kynurenine pathway levels: TNF alphaHour 0 and Hour 6 (4 hours after the ending of infusion)Levels of TNF alpha (picograms/milliliter)
Clinical: Ketamine adverse effectsHour 0 to hour 4Recording ketamine adverse effects during and right after the infusion
Clinical: Pain timelineSeven daysTimeline of self assessment on a simple numeric scale of the pain three times a day during a week. Numeric pain rating scale is a scale from 0 to 10. 0 is no pain, 10 is the worst pain we could imagine.
Percentage overall improvement in pain over a week with self assessmentBetween Hour 0 and Day 7Self assessment of the global improvement in pain over the week after infusion
Clinical: Subscore of Neuropathic pain symptom inventoryHour 0, Day 1, Day 4, Day 7Subscore on NPSI scoring: NEUROPATHIC PAIN SYMPTOM INVENTORY, subscore are burning from 0 to 10, pressing (deep) spontaneous pain from 0 to 10, paroxysmal pain from 0 to 10, evoked pain from 0 to 10, paresthesia or dysesthesia from 0 to 10 (0 is the minimal, 10 is the maximal value for each of the component).
Clinical: Hospital anxiety and depression scaleHour 0, Day 7.Recording scoring on hospital anxiety and depression scale. HADS scale is a tool to detect anxiety and depressive disorders. It includes fourteen questions from 0 to 3 points each. Seven are related to anxiety. Seven are related to depressive mood. It permits to obtain 2 different scales with the maximum of each of 21.
Percentage overall improvement in mood over a week with self assessmentBetween Hour 0 and day 7Self assessment of the global improvement of the mood over the week after infusion
Clinical: Pain area on a body cartographyHour 0, Day 1, Day 7.Evaluation of pain area on a body surface cartography
Paraclinical: Kynurenine pathway activation with ulcer pressureHour 0Studying the levels of the kynurenine pathway elements between patients with inflammatory component (ulcer pressure) and without inflammatory component (without ulcer pressure)
Clinical: Neuropathic pain symptom inventoryHour 0, Day 1, Day 4, Day 7NPSI scoring: Neuropathic pain symptom inventory. A composite score composed by neuropathic pain components: Burning, Pressure, Squeezing, Electric shocks, Stabbing, Evoked by brushing, evoked by pressure, evoked by cold stimuli, pins and needles, tingling. Two questions about the time of pain for twenty four hours, and the numbers of crisis. Score from 0 to 100. 100 is the maximum.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactCyril QUEMENEUR, Resident
c.quemeneur@gmx.com0033681193981
Backup ContactValeria Martinez, Md, Ph d
valeria.martinez@aphp.fr0033601819222

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026