Skip to content

A RCT to Compare Post-operative Sensitivity of Restorations With Fill-Up, a Dual Curing Composite and Conventional Composite Resin

A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare Post-operative Sensitivity of Restorations Completed With Fill-Up, a Dual Curing Composite and Conventional Composite Resin

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03513692
Enrollment
34
Registered
2018-05-01
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
2019-12-01
Last updated
2019-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Sensitivity of Existing Dental Filling Materials

Brief summary

The trial compares patient-reported postoperative sensitivity of 2 existing dental filling materials. The dental filling materials will be used according to manufacturer's instructions and within the existing CE marked licence. We are interested in investigating which licensed material confers the least postoperative discomfort to our patients in normal clinical use.

Interventions

DEVICEFill-Up composite resin

2 arm study comparing restoration of a tooth with either FillUp composite or conventional composite

Sponsors

University of Leeds
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient is over 18 2. Patient is under 70 3. Patient is capable of informed consent 4. The tooth responds to sensitivity testing ('vitality test' with an electric pulp tester) 5. The cavity is suitable for composite restoration 6. The patient prefers composite to amalgam. 7. The restoration required involves 2 or more surfaces of the tooth

Exclusion criteria

1. The tooth does not respond to an electric pulp test 2. The patient is suffering dental pain at the time of consent 3. The patient is currently taking long term analgesics 4. The patient is incapable of giving informed consent 5. The patient is a child under 18 6. The patient is unable to return the VAS assessment sheets at the appropriate time 7. The tooth to be filled is periodontally involved (grade 2 or grade 3 mobile)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post operative sensitivity1 monthpatient assessment by VAS

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactT P hyde, PhD BChD
t.p.hyde@leeds.ac.uk+44 (0)1133438515

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026