Skip to content

Comparison Between Internal Jugular Vein Versus Axillary Vein for Implantable Ports

Internal Jugular Vein Versus Axillary Vein With Single-incision for Implantable Ports: a Prospective and Randomized Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03512899
Enrollment
240
Registered
2018-05-01
Start date
2017-04-01
Completion date
2022-11-10
Last updated
2023-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Catheter Complications

Keywords

implantable port

Brief summary

Comparison between internal jugular vein versus via axillary vein with single-incision for placement of implantable ports in cancer patients. Investigators are recruiting 240 patients and randomizing 120 for each arm. Primary outcome is early complications, until 30 days and secondary outcome late complications, between 30 days and 6 months. The follow-up is 12 months.

Detailed description

Prospective and randomized trial comparing internal jugular vein versus via axillary vein with single-incision for placement of implantable ports in cancer patients. Investigators are recruiting 240 patients and randomizing 120 for each arm in a single center study at AC Camargo Cancer Center. Every surgery is assisted by ultrasound and radioscopic and the catheter is districath®, 8.5 French. Clinical assessment will be at 10 days and every 3 months after surgery. Primary outcome is early complications, until 30 days and secondary outcome late complications, between 30 days and 6 months. The follow-up is 12 months.

Interventions

PROCEDURERight internal jugular access.

Implantation using percutaneous puncture.

PROCEDURELeft internal jugular access.

Implantation using percutaneous puncture.

PROCEDURERight axillary vein access.

Implantation using percutaneous puncture.

PROCEDURELeft axillary vein access.

Implantation using percutaneous puncture.

Sponsors

AC Camargo Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Comparison between internal jugular vein versus via axillary vein with single-incision for placement of implantable ports in cancer patients. Investigators are recruiting 240 patients and randomizing 120 for each arm. Primary outcome is early complications, until 30 days and secondary outcome late complications, between 30 days and 6 months. The follow-up is 6 months.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Catheter due to chemotherapy. * Cancer patients. * ECOG (performance status) from 0 to 2. * Signed informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Non compliance. * Anticoagulant therapy. * Coagulopathy (platelet count below 50,000 and/or protrombin time above 18s). * Death within 30 days after the procedure. * Another catheter in superior vena cava. * Previous long term catheter in superior vena cava. * Obesity (IBM\>40 Kg/m2).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Early complications.30 daysEarly complications within 30 days during clinical assessment. These outcomes are divided in intra-operative complications, such as pneumothorax, hemothorax, vascular injury, cardiac arrhythmia, hematoma; and post-operative until 30 days complications such as wound infections, catheter related bacteremia, catheter disfunction, catheter related deep venous thrombosis, reservoir extrusion and skin erosion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Late complications30 to 180 daysPost-operative between 30 days and 6 months complications such as wound infections, catheter related bacteremia, catheter disfunction, catheter related deep venous thrombosis, reservoir extrusion and skin erosion.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026