Skip to content

Role of Active Deresuscitation After Resuscitation-2

Role of Active Deresuscitation After Resuscitation- 2: a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of Conservative Fluid Management Versus Usual Care in Critical Illness

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03512392
Acronym
RADAR-2
Enrollment
180
Registered
2018-04-30
Start date
2018-04-10
Completion date
2021-07-17
Last updated
2022-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness, Sepsis, Trauma

Keywords

fluid therapy, furosemide, diuretics, Injections, Intravenous, Infusions, Intravenous, Spironolactone, Indapamide

Brief summary

RADAR-2 will be a randomised, open-label, allocation concealed, pilot trial of conservative fluid administration and deresuscitation compared with usual care in patients who are critically ill.

Detailed description

The optimal approach to fluid balance in critically ill patients is uncertain. A recent systematic review found low quality evidence in favour of a conservative fluid or deresuscitative approach (active removal of accumulated fluid using diuretics and/or renal replacement therapy) compared with a liberal strategy or usual care. The RADAR-2 pilot randomised trial will compare conservative fluid and deresuscitation with usual care in patients who are mechanically ventilated in an intensive care unit. The main hypothesis is that in critically ill patients, a post-resuscitation fluid strategy comprising conservative fluid administration and active deresuscitation reduces net fluid balance, is safe and improves clinical outcomes.

Interventions

OTHERConservative fluid and deresuscitation strategy

Conservative administration of intravenous fluid and active deresuscitation using diuretics or renal replacement therapy for eligible patients

OTHERUsual care strategy

Usual care at the discretion of the clinical team

Sponsors

Queen's University, Belfast
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Toronto
CollaboratorOTHER
Belfast Health and Social Care Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Group assignment and early (up to 28 day) data will be locked and unavailable to investigators undertaking 6-month follow up.

Intervention model description

Randomised, open-label, allocation concealed, pilot trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Invasive mechanical ventilation 2. Treating ICU doctor expects patient to require treatment in an ICU beyond the next calendar day 3. Between 24 and 48 hours from ICU admission at the time of randomisation

Exclusion criteria

1. Age \< 16 years 2. Body weight \<40kg (measured or estimated) 3. Diabetic ketoacidosis or Hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state 4. Non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage 5. Acute cardiac failure or cardiogenic shock 6. End-stage renal failure (on dialysis) 7. Known to be pregnant 8. Suspected or proven active diabetes insipidus (DDAVP within 24 hours) 9. Not expected to survive for 72 hours 10. Active 'Do not attempt resuscitation' order 11. Refusal of consent 12. Inability of personal consultee to understand written or verbal information and for whom no interpreter is available 13. Known allergy to one or more of the study drugs 14. Inability to measure fluid balance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Day 3 fluid balanceFrom beginning of day 2 to the beginning of study day 3.Change in fluid balance (mL) between the beginning of study day 2 and the beginning of study day 3.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortality28 and 180 daysMortality
Acute kidney injuryUp to day 5.Incidence of new acute kidney injury defined as estimated KDIGO Stage 3 (before and after correction for fluid balance)
Cognitive function180 daysCognitive function score (assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-blind) instrument)
Health-related quality of life180 daysHealth-related quality of life (HR-QoL) (assessed using absolute values of a telephone-administered EQ-5D (EuroQoL 5 Dimension Scale) questionnaire). This has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, each of which are scored 1-5, with 1 being best and 5 being worst health. Each domain is reported separately. A total score is generated and is indexed to population reference values for that country (in this case UK) according to the time of data collection. It is therefore not possible to pre-specify a range for the indexed score.
Cumulative fluid balanceUp to the beginning of days 3 and 5, and at ICU discharge (estimated median day 7)Cumulative fluid balance (mL) from ICU admission
Incidence of significant protocol violationsUp to study day 5Incidence of significant protocol violations (total number of patients, per site, and by nature of protocol violation) up to day 5 (intervention period)
Incidence of reported adverse eventsUp to study day 5Incidence of reported adverse events up to day 5 (intervention period)
Change in Sequential Organ Function Assessment scoresFrom baseline until day 3 and day 5Change in Sequential Organ Function Assessment scores from baseline, overall (0-24) and 6 individual organ sub scores (respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological, coagulation, renal and liver, each scored 0-4 which are added to give a total score). Higher values represent more deranged physiology and predict mortality for critically ill patients.
Duration of mechanical ventilation28 daysDuration of mechanical ventilation in survivors and non-survivors (number of days or part thereof from initiation of mechanical ventilatory support until unassisted breathing)
Length of ICU stay28 daysLength of ICU stay (number of days or part thereof from admission to an ICU or being under the care of a critical care team or consultant until ICU discharge)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Regional cerebral hypoxia burden72 hours from randomisationNear infra-red spectroscopic measurement of regional cerebral oxygen saturation), proportion of time spent with rScO2 below thresholds of 50%, 65%, and 75% as a proportion of the time for which cerebral oxygenation is measured, expressed as a percentage.
Mean regional cerebral oxygen saturation72 hours from randomisationNear infra-red spectroscopic measurement of regional cerebral oxygen saturation), mean rScO2 level (%)
Minimum regional cerebral oxygen saturation72 hours from randomisationNear infra-red spectroscopic measurement of regional cerebral oxygen saturation), Minimum rScO2 level

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026