Skip to content

Immunogenicity Assessment of Peg-filgrastim vs. Neulasta® as Adjunct to Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer

An Open-label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Immunogenicity of Lupin's Peg-filgrastim Versus Neulasta® as an Adjunct to Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03511378
Enrollment
138
Registered
2018-04-27
Start date
2018-03-06
Completion date
2019-01-09
Last updated
2021-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Breast Carcinoma, Breast neoplasms, Breast Tumors, Cancer of Breast, Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA), Immunogenicity

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the immunogenicity of Peg-filgrastim versus Neulasta® as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer

Detailed description

An open-label, randomized, comparative, parallel group study to assess the Immunogenicity of Lupin's Peg-filgrastim versus Neulasta® as an Adjunct to Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer Primary Objective: To assess the immunogenicity of Lupin's Peg-filgrastim with Neulasta® in patients with breast cancer. Secondary Objectives: To assess the safety of Lupin's Peg-filgrastim with Neulasta® in patients with breast cancer

Interventions

DRUGLupin's Pegfilgrastim

Administration of Pegfilgrastim

Administration of Neulasta®

Sponsors

Lupin Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients must be able and willing to give written informed consent prior to any study related procedures 2. Ambulatory, female patients with an age ≥ 18 years 3. Patients with histologically or cytologically proven diagnosis of breast cancer who are eligible for neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. 4. Patients who are planned and eligible to receive/ receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimen that contains at least one chemotherapeutic agent from docetaxel/ paclitaxel / doxorubicin/ cyclophosphamide/ epirubicin 5. Patients who have not received any hematopoietic growth factors (e.g. G-CSF, PegGCSF, erythropoietin) or cytokines (e.g. interleukins, interferons) anytime in the past 6. Patients with baseline WBC ≥ LLN/ 3.5 x 109/L, ANC of ≥ 1.5 x 109/L, platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L and hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL 7. Patients with ECOG Performance status of ≤ 2 8. Patient who have estimated life expectancy of more than six months 9. No evidences of hemorrhage

Exclusion criteria

1 Male patients 2\. Hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or its components like E.coli proteins or similar product 3\. Patients weighing \<45 Kg 4\. Patients with myeloid malignancies and myelodysplasia or evidence of metastatic disease in bone marrow or brain 5\. Patients currently receiving radiation therapy or have completed radiation therapy within 4 weeks before study entry or likely to receive radiotherapy during the study 6\. Patients with prior bone marrow or stem cell transplantation 7\. Patients with chronic use of oral corticosteroids (Except ≤ 20 mg/day dose of prednisolone/ equivalent steroids), immunotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy and/or biological therapy or use of any other pegylated drug. 8\. Patients with history of systemic antibiotic use within 72 hours prior to chemotherapy 9\. Patients with any active infection which may require systemic antimicrobial therapy. Patients with inadequate hepatic and renal function \[defined as Alkaline Phosphatase \> 2.5 X Upper limits of normal (ULN), serum SGOT \> 2.5 X ULN, SGPT \> 2.5 X ULN, Total bilirubin \> 1.5 X ULN and Creatinine \> 1.5 X ULN of the reference range at the screening assessment\] 10\. Patients with seropositivity for HIV or HBV or HCV 11\. Known cases of Sickle Cell Anemia 12\. Patients with radiographic evidence of active pulmonary infections and/or recent history of pneumonia within 1 month of screening 13\. Patients with clinically evident splenomegaly confirmed subsequently by ultrasonography 14\. Patients with any other clinically significant disease(s) which, in the opinion of the investigator, could compromise the patient's involvement in the study or overall interpretation of the data. \[for e.g. uncontrolled hematologic, renal, hepatic, endocrine, neurologic, psychiatric, metabolic, pulmonary, cardiovascular disease/impaired functioning or history of any autoimmune disease\] 15\. Patients who have participated in another therapeutic clinical study within the past 30 days prior to screening, or are likely to simultaneously participate in another therapeutic clinical study 16\. Patients who are doubtful to comply with study procedures for mental, psychological or social reasons. 17\. Women of child-bearing potential who are not willing to follow a reliable & effective contraceptive measure during the course of the study & at least 3 months after the last dose of study drug. 18\. Pregnant and Breast feeding women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Cumulative Incidence of Anti-pegfilgrastim Antibodies (Binding and Neutralizing) to Pegfilgrastim Between Treatment Groups at the End of Cycle 4 (Day 84).End of cycle 4, Day 84The difference in cumulative incidence of anti-pegfilgrastim antibodies (binding and neutralizing) (measured as difference in proportion of patients with antibodies) to Pegfilgrastim between study groups at the end of cycle 4 will be calculated. Those samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were analyzed for presence of neutralizing antibodies to Pegfilgrastim.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Cumulative Incidence of Anti-peg Antibodies (Binding and Neutralizing) Between Treatment Groups at the End of Cycle 4 (Day 84).Day 84.The presence of anti-peg antibodies (binding) (measured as difference in proportion of patients with antibodies) between treatment groups at the end of cycle 4 (Day 84) were compared and analysis for the ITT population
Comparison of Incidence of Anti-pegfilgrastim Antibodies (Binding & Neutralizing) to Pegfilgrastim Between Treatment Groups on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63 and Day 84Assessment at each study visit on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63, Day 84Comparison of incidence of anti-pegfilgrastim antibodies (binding & neutralizing) (measured as difference in proportion of patients with antibodies) to pegfilgrastim between treatment groups on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63, Day 84. Analysis population : ITT
Secondary Immunogenicity EndpointDay 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63 and Day 84.Comparison of incidence of anti-peg antibodies (binding & neutralizing) (measured as difference in proportion of patients with antibodies) between treatment groups on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63 and Day 84. Analysis population: ITT population

Countries

India

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The treatment group (Lupin pegfilgrastim or Neulasta®) for each patient during the study was determined according to the study randomization list. The treatment was assigned at the time of randomization, after confirming the patient's eligibility. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Lupin pegfilgrastim or Neulasta®.

Pre-assignment details

All enrolled population included all screened patients who signed the informed consent. The randomized population included all randomized patients irrespective of whether patient received any study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lupin's Pegfilgrastim
6 mg, subcutaneous injection on day 2 or 3 of each 21 ± 3 day cycle. Number of cycles: 4. Lupin's Pegfilgrastim: Administration of Pegfilgrastim
70
Neulasta®
6 mg, subcutaneous injection on day 2 or 3 of each 21 ± 3 day cycle. Number of cycles: 4. Neulasta®: Administration of Neulasta®
68
Total138

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPatient not coming or schedule visit10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLupin's PegfilgrastimTotalNeulasta®
Age, Continuous53.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.59
51.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.52
48.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.73
ECOG Status at Screening
Grade 0
20 Participants36 Participants16 Participants
ECOG Status at Screening
Grade 1
50 Participants102 Participants52 Participants
ECOG Status at Screening
Grade 2
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
ECOG Status at Screening
Grade 3
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
ECOG Status at Screening
Grade 4
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
ECOG Status at Screening
Grade 5
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
70 Participants138 Participants68 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
70 Participants138 Participants68 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
India
70 participants138 participants68 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
70 Participants138 Participants68 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 700 / 68
other
Total, other adverse events
57 / 7056 / 68
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 702 / 68

Outcome results

Primary

Comparison of Cumulative Incidence of Anti-pegfilgrastim Antibodies (Binding and Neutralizing) to Pegfilgrastim Between Treatment Groups at the End of Cycle 4 (Day 84).

The difference in cumulative incidence of anti-pegfilgrastim antibodies (binding and neutralizing) (measured as difference in proportion of patients with antibodies) to Pegfilgrastim between study groups at the end of cycle 4 will be calculated. Those samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were analyzed for presence of neutralizing antibodies to Pegfilgrastim.

Time frame: End of cycle 4, Day 84

Population: Intention-to-treat analysis population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lupin's PegfilgrastimComparison of Cumulative Incidence of Anti-pegfilgrastim Antibodies (Binding and Neutralizing) to Pegfilgrastim Between Treatment Groups at the End of Cycle 4 (Day 84).0.0145 Proportion of patients with antibodies
Neulasta®Comparison of Cumulative Incidence of Anti-pegfilgrastim Antibodies (Binding and Neutralizing) to Pegfilgrastim Between Treatment Groups at the End of Cycle 4 (Day 84).0.0441 Proportion of patients with antibodies
Comparison: Analysis population : ITTp-value: 0.007Difference in proportion
Secondary

Comparison of Cumulative Incidence of Anti-peg Antibodies (Binding and Neutralizing) Between Treatment Groups at the End of Cycle 4 (Day 84).

The presence of anti-peg antibodies (binding) (measured as difference in proportion of patients with antibodies) between treatment groups at the end of cycle 4 (Day 84) were compared and analysis for the ITT population

Time frame: Day 84.

Population: Intention to treat population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lupin's PegfilgrastimComparison of Cumulative Incidence of Anti-peg Antibodies (Binding and Neutralizing) Between Treatment Groups at the End of Cycle 4 (Day 84).0.0145 Proportion of patients with antibodies
Neulasta®Comparison of Cumulative Incidence of Anti-peg Antibodies (Binding and Neutralizing) Between Treatment Groups at the End of Cycle 4 (Day 84).0 Proportion of patients with antibodies
Comparison: Analysis population: ITTp-value: <0.001Difference in proportion
Secondary

Comparison of Incidence of Anti-pegfilgrastim Antibodies (Binding & Neutralizing) to Pegfilgrastim Between Treatment Groups on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63 and Day 84

Comparison of incidence of anti-pegfilgrastim antibodies (binding & neutralizing) (measured as difference in proportion of patients with antibodies) to pegfilgrastim between treatment groups on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63, Day 84. Analysis population : ITT

Time frame: Assessment at each study visit on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63, Day 84

Population: The Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population included all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and subsequently provided immunogenicity variable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lupin's PegfilgrastimComparison of Incidence of Anti-pegfilgrastim Antibodies (Binding & Neutralizing) to Pegfilgrastim Between Treatment Groups on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63 and Day 84Day 210 Participants
Lupin's PegfilgrastimComparison of Incidence of Anti-pegfilgrastim Antibodies (Binding & Neutralizing) to Pegfilgrastim Between Treatment Groups on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63 and Day 84Day 630 Participants
Lupin's PegfilgrastimComparison of Incidence of Anti-pegfilgrastim Antibodies (Binding & Neutralizing) to Pegfilgrastim Between Treatment Groups on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63 and Day 84Day 421 Participants
Lupin's PegfilgrastimComparison of Incidence of Anti-pegfilgrastim Antibodies (Binding & Neutralizing) to Pegfilgrastim Between Treatment Groups on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63 and Day 84Day 84 (EOS)0 Participants
Lupin's PegfilgrastimComparison of Incidence of Anti-pegfilgrastim Antibodies (Binding & Neutralizing) to Pegfilgrastim Between Treatment Groups on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63 and Day 84Day 101 Participants
Neulasta®Comparison of Incidence of Anti-pegfilgrastim Antibodies (Binding & Neutralizing) to Pegfilgrastim Between Treatment Groups on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63 and Day 84Day 84 (EOS)0 Participants
Neulasta®Comparison of Incidence of Anti-pegfilgrastim Antibodies (Binding & Neutralizing) to Pegfilgrastim Between Treatment Groups on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63 and Day 84Day 100 Participants
Neulasta®Comparison of Incidence of Anti-pegfilgrastim Antibodies (Binding & Neutralizing) to Pegfilgrastim Between Treatment Groups on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63 and Day 84Day 211 Participants
Neulasta®Comparison of Incidence of Anti-pegfilgrastim Antibodies (Binding & Neutralizing) to Pegfilgrastim Between Treatment Groups on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63 and Day 84Day 421 Participants
Neulasta®Comparison of Incidence of Anti-pegfilgrastim Antibodies (Binding & Neutralizing) to Pegfilgrastim Between Treatment Groups on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63 and Day 84Day 631 Participants
Secondary

Secondary Immunogenicity Endpoint

Comparison of incidence of anti-peg antibodies (binding & neutralizing) (measured as difference in proportion of patients with antibodies) between treatment groups on Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63 and Day 84. Analysis population: ITT population

Time frame: Day 10, Day 21, Day 42, Day 63 and Day 84.

Population: The Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population included all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and subsequently provided immunogenicity variable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lupin's PegfilgrastimSecondary Immunogenicity EndpointDay 210 Participants
Lupin's PegfilgrastimSecondary Immunogenicity EndpointDay 630 Participants
Lupin's PegfilgrastimSecondary Immunogenicity EndpointDay 421 Participants
Lupin's PegfilgrastimSecondary Immunogenicity EndpointDay 84 (EOS)0 Participants
Lupin's PegfilgrastimSecondary Immunogenicity EndpointDay 100 Participants
Neulasta®Secondary Immunogenicity EndpointDay 84 (EOS)0 Participants
Neulasta®Secondary Immunogenicity EndpointDay 100 Participants
Neulasta®Secondary Immunogenicity EndpointDay 210 Participants
Neulasta®Secondary Immunogenicity EndpointDay 420 Participants
Neulasta®Secondary Immunogenicity EndpointDay 630 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026