Skip to content

Impact of Practitioner and Instructional Set on Subject Perceptions and Expectations of Cervical Spine Manipulation

The Impact of Practitioner and Instructional Set on Subject Expectations of Cervical Spine Manipulation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03509649
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-04-26
Start date
2018-04-01
Completion date
2019-05-17
Last updated
2019-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Brief summary

Determine effects of perceptions and expectations on experience of cervical spine manipulation

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to better understand how therapists may affect a patient's thoughts/ beliefs/ opinions on cervical spine (neck) manipulation. Current evidence suggests that patients who have a positive expectation about neck manipulation are more likely to report benefit from it, and we wish to determine if the perceived experience level of the therapist and the words they use to describe neck manipulation will affect the patient's perception.

Interventions

High-velocity low-amplitude thrust joint manipulation to the cervical spine

Sponsors

University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants randomly assigned to one of 2 instructional sets (positive/ negative) and randomly assigned to one of 2 practitioner experience levels (experienced/ novice)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. age 18-65 years; 2. must report having no current episode of mechanical neck pain; 3. must be willing to participate; 4. must indicate they have not had their neck manipulated by a physical therapist, osteopath or chiropractor within the last 5 years.

Exclusion criteria

1. 'Red flag' items indicated in your Neck Medical Screening Questionnaire such as: history of a tumor, bone fracture, metabolic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, severe atherosclerosis, prolonged history of steroid use, heart disease, and stroke. 2. History of neck whiplash injury. 3. Diagnosis from your physician of cervical spinal stenosis (narrowing of spinal canal) or presence of symptoms (pain, pins and needles, numbness) in both arms. 4. Presence of central nervous system involvement such as exaggerated reflexes, changes in sensation in the hands or face, muscle wasting in the hands, altered taste, and presence of abnormal reflexes. 5. Evidence of neurological signs suggesting nerve root entrapment (pinched nerve in the neck). 6. Prior surgery to your neck or upper back. 7. A medical condition which may change your sensation of pain or pressure pain thresholds (i.e. taking analgesics, sedatives, history of substance abuse, or cognitive deficiency). 8. Diagnosis from your physician of fibromyalgia syndrome. 9. Currently pregnant, or think you may be pregnant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPE)Immediate7 point Likert scale anchored with 1 completely recovered to 7 worse than ever.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perception of comfort scaleImmediate5 point Likert scale ranging from 1 very comfortable to 5 very uncomfortable
Beliefs about cervical spine manipulationImmediate6 questions determining participant's beliefs about safety, comfort and effectiveness of spinal manipulation. Likert scale with statements participants can 'completely disagree', 'somewhat disagree', 'neutral', 'somewhat agree', or 'completely agree' with

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026