Skip to content

Short vs Long Dental Implants for the Fixed Rehabilitation of the Fully Edentulous Mandible

Short vs Long Implants Supporting a Total Fixed Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Fully Edentulous Mandible. A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03509402
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-04-26
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2021-02-28
Last updated
2025-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Edentulous Jaw

Keywords

short dental implants, full-arch prosthesis

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to clinically and radiographically compare the performance of short (6 mm-long) versus long (≥11 mm-long) dental implants placed in the interforaminal region of fully edentulous mandibles, supporting a screw-retained full-arch cantilever bridge.

Detailed description

The use of short dental implants provides undeniable benefits in sites where the reduced available volume would otherwise need bone augmentation procedures and their use has greatly expanded in the recent years. However, well designed clinical trials which provide a sound evidence of their performance and reliability are still lacking to date. In this post-market, multi-center, open, parallel-group, randomized, controlled clinical trial the investigators aim to to clinically and radiographically compare the performance of short (6 mm-long) versus long (≥11 mm-long) dental implants supporting a mandibular screw-retained full-arch cantilever bridge. Five 4mm-wide/6mm-long (test) or 4mm-wide/≥11mm-long (control) titanium dental implants (Osseospeed™, ASTRA TECH Implant System™, Dentsply Sirona) are placed in the interforaminal region of fully edentulous mandibles, in non-regenerated sites, with at least 1 mm of peri-implant bone circumferentially. All products are CE (European Conformity) marked and used within their intended use. Two-Stage surgery is performed, implants are positioned in healed bone and exposed after 3 months to be connected with the prosthesis. This is a medium-term follow-up study including evaluations also at 1 and 3 years from the baseline. Three italian centers participate: Naples (University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli), Naples (AORN A. Cardarelli), Catania (Private Office). The study protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli.

Interventions

DEVICEASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: 6 mm

Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible by a full-arch srew-retained prosthesis with distal cantilevers supported by five interforaminal short implants (ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: 6 mm)

DEVICEASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: ≥11mm

Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible by a full-arch srew-retained prosthesis with distal cantilevers supported by five interforaminal long implants (ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: ≥11mm)

Sponsors

Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* total edentulous patients in the lower region since at least 8 months, * sufficient amount of native bone (no augmentation procedures) in the recipient sites to allow ≥11 mm long and 4 mm wide implant installation (≥1 mm of peri-implant bone circumferentially) * systemic health * compliance with good oral hygiene * informed consent signed.

Exclusion criteria

* any disease, medication or drug that could jeopardize healing, osseointegration or treatment outcome, * untreated caries or periodontitis of the remaining teeth, * mucosal and bone tissue lesions, * severe bruxism or other parafunction habits, * unrealistic aesthetic demands, * patient taking part to another study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Marginal Bone Level (MBL) Change5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading)Marginal bone level (MBL) is measured as the distance in millimiters calculated on periapical radiographs from the implant neck to the most coronal bone-to-implant contact point at both the mesial and the distal side of each implant. The radiographs will be taken with an X-ray apparatus supplied with a long cone and Rinn's film holders.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Implant Survival Rate5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading)A surviving implant is defined as an implant in place at the time of the follow-up. Any implant loss shall be assessed as an early loss (implant fails before being osseointegrated) or late loss (after being osseointegrated).
Prosthesis Survival5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading)A surviving prosthesis is defined as still in place at the time of the follow-up.
Biological Complications5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading)Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis
Technical Complications5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading)Technical complications are categorized in minor and major complications. The formers require only chair-side repair and include screw loosening and veneer material fracture. The latters require additional laboratory procedures and/or replacement components and include prosthesis or framework fracture, screw fracture, implant fracture, and extended wear requiring veneer renewal.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Short Implants
A full-arch screw-retained mandibular prosthesis with distal cantilevers supported by five interforaminal short implants (ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: 6mm) ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: 6 mm: Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible by a full-arch srew-retained prosthesis with distal cantilevers supported by five interforaminal short implants (ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: 6 mm)
15
Long Implants
A full-arch srew-retained mandibular prosthesis with distal cantilevers supported by five interforaminal short implants (ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: ≥11mm) ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: ≥11mm: Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible by a full-arch srew-retained prosthesis with distal cantilevers supported by five interforaminal long implants (ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: ≥11mm)
15
Total30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicShort ImplantsLong ImplantsTotal
Age, Continuous63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants15 Participants30 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
15 participants15 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants3 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants12 Participants17 Participants
Smoking habit3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Marginal Bone Level (MBL) Change

Marginal bone level (MBL) is measured as the distance in millimiters calculated on periapical radiographs from the implant neck to the most coronal bone-to-implant contact point at both the mesial and the distal side of each implant. The radiographs will be taken with an X-ray apparatus supplied with a long cone and Rinn's film holders.

Time frame: 5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Short ImplantsMarginal Bone Level (MBL) Change0.30 mmStandard Deviation 0.31
Long ImplantsMarginal Bone Level (MBL) Change0.40 mmStandard Deviation 0.23
Secondary

Biological Complications

Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis

Time frame: 5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Short ImplantsBiological Complications2 Participants
Long ImplantsBiological Complications3 Participants
Secondary

Implant Survival Rate

A surviving implant is defined as an implant in place at the time of the follow-up. Any implant loss shall be assessed as an early loss (implant fails before being osseointegrated) or late loss (after being osseointegrated).

Time frame: 5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Short ImplantsImplant Survival Rate65 Implants
Long ImplantsImplant Survival Rate70 Implants
Secondary

Prosthesis Survival

A surviving prosthesis is defined as still in place at the time of the follow-up.

Time frame: 5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Short ImplantsProsthesis Survival13 Prostheses
Long ImplantsProsthesis Survival14 Prostheses
Secondary

Technical Complications

Technical complications are categorized in minor and major complications. The formers require only chair-side repair and include screw loosening and veneer material fracture. The latters require additional laboratory procedures and/or replacement components and include prosthesis or framework fracture, screw fracture, implant fracture, and extended wear requiring veneer renewal.

Time frame: 5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Short ImplantsTechnical Complications7 Participants
Long ImplantsTechnical Complications5 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026