Edentulous Jaw
Conditions
Keywords
short dental implants, full-arch prosthesis
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to clinically and radiographically compare the performance of short (6 mm-long) versus long (≥11 mm-long) dental implants placed in the interforaminal region of fully edentulous mandibles, supporting a screw-retained full-arch cantilever bridge.
Detailed description
The use of short dental implants provides undeniable benefits in sites where the reduced available volume would otherwise need bone augmentation procedures and their use has greatly expanded in the recent years. However, well designed clinical trials which provide a sound evidence of their performance and reliability are still lacking to date. In this post-market, multi-center, open, parallel-group, randomized, controlled clinical trial the investigators aim to to clinically and radiographically compare the performance of short (6 mm-long) versus long (≥11 mm-long) dental implants supporting a mandibular screw-retained full-arch cantilever bridge. Five 4mm-wide/6mm-long (test) or 4mm-wide/≥11mm-long (control) titanium dental implants (Osseospeed™, ASTRA TECH Implant System™, Dentsply Sirona) are placed in the interforaminal region of fully edentulous mandibles, in non-regenerated sites, with at least 1 mm of peri-implant bone circumferentially. All products are CE (European Conformity) marked and used within their intended use. Two-Stage surgery is performed, implants are positioned in healed bone and exposed after 3 months to be connected with the prosthesis. This is a medium-term follow-up study including evaluations also at 1 and 3 years from the baseline. Three italian centers participate: Naples (University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli), Naples (AORN A. Cardarelli), Catania (Private Office). The study protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli.
Interventions
Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible by a full-arch srew-retained prosthesis with distal cantilevers supported by five interforaminal short implants (ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: 6 mm)
Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible by a full-arch srew-retained prosthesis with distal cantilevers supported by five interforaminal long implants (ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: ≥11mm)
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* total edentulous patients in the lower region since at least 8 months, * sufficient amount of native bone (no augmentation procedures) in the recipient sites to allow ≥11 mm long and 4 mm wide implant installation (≥1 mm of peri-implant bone circumferentially) * systemic health * compliance with good oral hygiene * informed consent signed.
Exclusion criteria
* any disease, medication or drug that could jeopardize healing, osseointegration or treatment outcome, * untreated caries or periodontitis of the remaining teeth, * mucosal and bone tissue lesions, * severe bruxism or other parafunction habits, * unrealistic aesthetic demands, * patient taking part to another study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Marginal Bone Level (MBL) Change | 5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading) | Marginal bone level (MBL) is measured as the distance in millimiters calculated on periapical radiographs from the implant neck to the most coronal bone-to-implant contact point at both the mesial and the distal side of each implant. The radiographs will be taken with an X-ray apparatus supplied with a long cone and Rinn's film holders. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Implant Survival Rate | 5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading) | A surviving implant is defined as an implant in place at the time of the follow-up. Any implant loss shall be assessed as an early loss (implant fails before being osseointegrated) or late loss (after being osseointegrated). |
| Prosthesis Survival | 5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading) | A surviving prosthesis is defined as still in place at the time of the follow-up. |
| Biological Complications | 5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading) | Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis |
| Technical Complications | 5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading) | Technical complications are categorized in minor and major complications. The formers require only chair-side repair and include screw loosening and veneer material fracture. The latters require additional laboratory procedures and/or replacement components and include prosthesis or framework fracture, screw fracture, implant fracture, and extended wear requiring veneer renewal. |
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Short Implants A full-arch screw-retained mandibular prosthesis with distal cantilevers supported by five interforaminal short implants (ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: 6mm)
ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: 6 mm: Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible by a full-arch srew-retained prosthesis with distal cantilevers supported by five interforaminal short implants (ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: 6 mm) | 15 |
| Long Implants A full-arch srew-retained mandibular prosthesis with distal cantilevers supported by five interforaminal short implants (ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: ≥11mm)
ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: ≥11mm: Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible by a full-arch srew-retained prosthesis with distal cantilevers supported by five interforaminal long implants (ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S, length: ≥11mm) | 15 |
| Total | 30 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Short Implants | Long Implants | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 63 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3 | 61 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 | 63 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 15 Participants | 15 Participants | 30 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 15 participants | 15 participants | 30 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 10 Participants | 3 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 5 Participants | 12 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Smoking habit | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
Outcome results
Marginal Bone Level (MBL) Change
Marginal bone level (MBL) is measured as the distance in millimiters calculated on periapical radiographs from the implant neck to the most coronal bone-to-implant contact point at both the mesial and the distal side of each implant. The radiographs will be taken with an X-ray apparatus supplied with a long cone and Rinn's film holders.
Time frame: 5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Short Implants | Marginal Bone Level (MBL) Change | 0.30 mm | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| Long Implants | Marginal Bone Level (MBL) Change | 0.40 mm | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
Biological Complications
Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis
Time frame: 5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Short Implants | Biological Complications | 2 Participants |
| Long Implants | Biological Complications | 3 Participants |
Implant Survival Rate
A surviving implant is defined as an implant in place at the time of the follow-up. Any implant loss shall be assessed as an early loss (implant fails before being osseointegrated) or late loss (after being osseointegrated).
Time frame: 5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Short Implants | Implant Survival Rate | 65 Implants |
| Long Implants | Implant Survival Rate | 70 Implants |
Prosthesis Survival
A surviving prosthesis is defined as still in place at the time of the follow-up.
Time frame: 5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Short Implants | Prosthesis Survival | 13 Prostheses |
| Long Implants | Prosthesis Survival | 14 Prostheses |
Technical Complications
Technical complications are categorized in minor and major complications. The formers require only chair-side repair and include screw loosening and veneer material fracture. The latters require additional laboratory procedures and/or replacement components and include prosthesis or framework fracture, screw fracture, implant fracture, and extended wear requiring veneer renewal.
Time frame: 5 years from baseline (prosthetic loading)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Short Implants | Technical Complications | 7 Participants |
| Long Implants | Technical Complications | 5 Participants |