Skip to content

Evaluation of a Treadmill Workstation in an Emergency Dispatch Center

Evaluation of a Treadmill Workstation in an Emergency Dispatch Center. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03507764
Acronym
Marche_15
Enrollment
32
Registered
2018-04-25
Start date
2018-02-15
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2021-10-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Work-Related Condition

Keywords

Treadmills, Exercise, Number of steps, Dispatchers

Brief summary

The principal objective of this study is to determine if the provision of a treadmill workstation in an emergency medical services (EMS) dispatch center increases the number of steps that participants make daily within 6 months compared to the usual working conditions. The investigators hypothesized that the provision of a treadmill workstation with a slow walking could increase the number of daily steps and decrease days of leave, musculoskeletal disorders without decreasing the dispatch quality.

Detailed description

Sedentariness, measured by the daily duration of time spent seated is a cardiovascular risk factor, chronic pathologies (cancer, musculoskeletal pain) and mortality. The employees who remain seated from 8 to 11 hours per day have an increase risk of death within 3 years (15%). This increase reaches 40% for more than 11 hours a day. The restoration of a daily moderate physical activity from 60 to 75 minutes could permit to eliminate this increased risk. Interventions in workplace to limit sitting are associated with a metabolic benefit, but also with a reduction in musculoskeletal problems and fatigue. The role of dispatchers is to initiate the medical record by determining the severity of the call and take rapid and adequate decision. They are seated behind their desks from 8 to 11 hours in a busy and stressful environment. Many dispatchers are complaining of musculoskeletal disorders and weight gain. An internal study conducted between between 2012 and 2016 showed an increase in long-term pain, irritability and sleep disorders. Overall, 65% of the respondents reported that they were tired at work and had less empathy. The use of workstations with low-speed treadmills were assessed to allow physical activity at work. A recent review concluded that their use reduced the time that the employees spent seated, stress and improved energy expenditure, as well as different biological and physical parameters (weight loss, lipid determination, glycaemia). This study did not reveal any alterations in performance at work. The investigators assume that the establishment of a position allowing slow walk during dispatch call would increase the number of steps made by dispatchers on a daily basis and reduce the number of days of leave and musculoskeletal disorders, without impairing the quality of call pick-up.

Interventions

OTHERUse of the treadmill workstation at work

During the randomized study phase, provision of the treadmill workstation with the recommendation to use it for at least one hour (continuous or split) during each of the working shifts. After six months, all subjects will use treadmill without restrictions or conditions.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Dispatchers working in Emergency Medical Service

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant women * Inability to walk

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference of number of steps at 0 and 6 months0 and 6 monthsNumber of daily steps measured by actimetry (including all walking activities measured over a day). Measurements will be done with actimetry during one week before the randomization and at 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of Anxiety and depression0, 6 and 12 monthsAssessment of anxiety depression with the validated Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score. This questionnaire helps your physician to know how the patient is feeling.
Change in blood pressure0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 monthsAssessment of blood pressure every month
Change in heart rate0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 monthsAssessment of heart rate every month
Change in Weight0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 monthsAssessment of weight every month
Assessment of musculoskeletal disorders0, 6 and 12 monthsAssessment with the validated Standardised Nordic Questionnaire
Evaluation of non-attendance at work0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 monthsNumber of workdays not realised during the month
Evaluation of Quality of life0, 6 and 12 monthsAssessment of quality of life with the validated Short Form Health Survey assessment SF-36
Work satisfaction evaluation0, 6 and 12 monthsAssessment with the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (7-points scale). Level of Satisfaction - 7 point 0 - Completely dissatisfied 1. \- Mostly dissatisfied 2. \- Somewhat dissatisfied 3. \- neither satisfied or dissatisfied 4. \- Somewhat satisfied 5. \- Mostly satisfied 6. \- Completely satisfied
Assessment of sleep quality0, 6 and 12 monthsAssessment with the Pittsburgh Quality Index survey
Evaluation of tobacco consumption0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 monthsMean of packs of smoked cigarettes during the week before the evaluation. This evaluation is based on a declared and quantitative consumption.
Evaluation of pickup calls quality0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 monthsCalls are evaluated according to the following criteria: * Presentation of the volunteer at the picked up of the call * Audio quality * Listening of the patient request * Empathy * Relevance of the call sort * Management of the end of communication * Call duration
Walking period during a working day1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 monthsEvaluation of walking time on the treadmill with the integrated software
Job performance evaluation0, 6 and 12 monthsAssessment with the Likert scale (7-points scale) Level of Performance - 7 point 0 - Not at all performant 1. \- Low performant 2. \- Slightly performant 3. \- Neutral 4. \- Moderately performant 5. \- Very performant 6. \- Extremely performant

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026