Skip to content

Efficacy of Extremely Low Magnetic Field (ELF) in Fibromyalgic Patients

Efficacy of Extremely Low Magnetic Field (ELF) in Fibromyalgic Patients: Effect on Symptoms Severity, Sleep and Quality of Life.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03503760
Enrollment
48
Registered
2018-04-20
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2017-07-31
Last updated
2018-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Keywords

Extremely low magnetic field (ELF), Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQ), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Short Form-12 of Physical and Mental Health Summary (SF-12), LIMFA Therapy® machine from Eywa Srl system

Brief summary

This is a randomized double-blind crossover study. The investigators applied ELF with a device named LIMFA Therapy® to 48 fibromyalgic patients, assigned in two groups (true-sham and sham-true). Fibromyalgia severity was assessed with the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), quality of sleep with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire and global quality of life with Short Form-12 of Physical and Mental Health Summary (SF-12) questionnaire.

Detailed description

In the first part of the protocol the group true-sham received 6 twice a week sessions of true ELF therapy of 1 hour, following the antinflammatory, analgesic and biorhythm settings of the device LIMFA Therapy®. The sham-true group patients received 6 twice a week sessions of sham therapy (no therapy). During the second part of the protocol, the true-sham group received the sham therapy twice a week for 3 weeks and the sham-true group received the actual true therapy twice a week for 3 weeks. For the assessment of pain, sleep quality and global quality of life, a set of questionnaires were administrated at specific stages of the protocol. Questionnaires were administrated every three weeks: before the first therapy, after the first course of therapy, after the washout period, after the second course of therapy, and 3 weeks after the end of treatment.

Interventions

DEVICELIMFA Therapy®

It applies a packages of magneto-electric field sequences having variable geometry, with frequencies and intensities that vary in a range of 0-80 Hertz and 0-100 microTesla, respectively.

Sponsors

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Masking description

Participant and care provider were unaware of the treatment as the machine does not make any sound or heat during the session. Only the nurse that physically connect the cable to the generator knows if the patient recieve or not the therapy but she was not involved in clinical evaluation.

Intervention model description

Patients have been randomized in two groups using Research randomizer avaliable at www.randomizer.org. The first group of patients true-sham received 6 twice a week sessions of true ELF therapy of one hour with LIMFA Therapy®, following the antinflammatory, analgesic and biorhythm settings of the device. Then, after a wash-out period (three weeks), it received the sham therapy (no therapy) twice a week for three weeks. The second group sham-true received 6 twice a week sessions of sham therapy (no therapy) and then, after the wash-out period (three weeks), it received 6 session of true ELF therapy twice a week for three weeks. A set of questionnaires were administrated: before first session, after first session, after the wash-out period, after second session and after three week follow-up in both groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with an established fibromyalgia diagnosis of at least three months according to American College of Rheumatology 2010 modified criteria and no responsive to their current therapy. * patients were not responsive to amitryptiline, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or duloxetine and pregabalin (with a pain reduction below 50% compared to pre-therapy or intolerant to these drugs) * patients with a pain level measured with Visual Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS) \> 50/100. * patients that had been taking other drugs or food supplements for the treatment of fibromyalgia for at least 6 months.

Exclusion criteria

* patients that completed either physiotherapy or acupuncture or behavioral treatment in the last 6 months * patients that were affected by other painful syndromes or potentially painful syndromes other than fibromyalgia. * pregnant women * pace-maker carriers * oncologic patients * tuberculotic patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
FIQ12 weeksFibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire is a comprehensive questionnaire for evaluation of fibromyalgia severity. The scale range is from 0 to100 and higher values are considered worse outcomes. In the severity analysis a FIQ score from 0 to 38 represents a mild condition, from 39 to 58 represents a moderate condition, and from 59 to 100 a severe condition. A reduction of FIQ between 10 and 20% is related to a clinically significative intervention. (Bennett, R. et al.(2009))

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PSQI12 weeksPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaire measures the quality of sleep. The scale range is from 0 to 21. Higher scores are related to worse sleep condition and the best cut-off score is 5: starting from it, people are identified as affected by sleep disorders. A significant reduction of sleep impairment after treatment is one of the secondary outcome.
SF-1212 weeksShort Form-12 of Physical and Mental Health Summary measures global quality of life. The results consist of two index: Physical Component Summary(PCS) and Mental Component Summary(MCS). The lower outcomes represent a worse physical and mental condition. A significant improvement of quality of life after treatment is one of the secondary outcome.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026