Skip to content

Reducing Risk for Alzheimer's Disease in High-Risk Women Through Yogic Meditation Training

Reducing Risk for Alzheimer's Disease in High-Risk Women Through Yogic Meditation Training

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03503669
Enrollment
100
Registered
2018-04-20
Start date
2018-05-01
Completion date
2021-02-01
Last updated
2024-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer's Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

Memory impairment, Meditation, Yoga, Memory Training, Mild Cognitive Impairment, MCI, Geriatric, fMRI, Alzheimer's disease, Cardiovascular risk

Brief summary

The purpose of this pilot study will be to test whether Kundalini yoga (KY) and Kirtan Kriya (KK) yogic meditation is superior to Memory Enhancement Training (MET) for improving cognitive functioning, health (including cardiovascular factors), and mood in women with high AD risk.

Detailed description

Overall, the investigators anticipate recruiting 100 women (50 or older) with MCI and high Alzheimer's disease risk. Subjects will either receive: (1) MET class for 60 minutes per week; or (2) Kundalini yoga and Kirtan Kriya meditation class for 60 minutes per week. Assessments will be completed immediately after the interventions at 6 and 12 weeks and follow-up visits at week 24 and 48 to monitor the overall benefit of the intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMemory Training

Participants will attend a weekly memory training class for 12 weeks as well as receive daily memory homework (12 minute duration) for the 12 weeks.

Participants will participate in a 60 minute yoga and meditation session weekly for 12 weeks and will be assigned a daily Kirtan Kriya meditation (12 minute duration) for 12 weeks.

Sponsors

Alzheimer's Research and Prevention Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, Los Angeles
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
50 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Amnestic MCI, as defined by a Clinical Dementia Rating Scale score of .5. 2. High cardiovascular risk defined as at least one of the following: * 7.5 percentile risk or higher using ASCVD risk calculator * Myocardial Infarction more than 6 months ago * Diabetes * Taking medication for blood pressure \> 140/90 blood pressure * Taking medication for lyperlipidemia LDL \>160 3. Sufficient English proficiency and the 8th grade or higher reading level as determined by the word reading subtest of the Wide Range Achievement Test-IV (this criterion is necessary in order to ensure ability to participate in MET, which involves reading and writing and has a Flesch-Kinkaid school equivalency of 7th grade) 4. Capacity to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. History of psychosis, bipolar disorder, alcohol/ drug dependence, or neurological disorder 2. Recent (within three months) surgery, anticipated surgery within next year, or unstable medical condition 3. Any disability preventing participation in MET or KK+KY (e.g., severe visual or hearing impairment) 4. Insufficient English proficiency to participate in either MET or KK+KY 5. Diagnosis of dementia 6. Mini Mental Health Examination score of 23 or below 7. Currently taking any psychoactive medication 8. Participation in a psychotherapy that involves cognitive training 9. Practice of Kundalini Yoga or Kirtan Kriya within the past year 10. Myocardial Infarction within the past 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) Total Recall ScoreMeasured at Baseline and Week 24Verbal memory was measured with the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) total recall scores. The HVLT form contains 12 nouns, four words each from one of three semantic categories (e.g., precious gems, articles of clothing, vegetables, etc.), to be learned over the course of three learning trials. When scoring the HVLT, the three learning trials are combined to calculate a total recall score. Total scores range from 0-36 with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Change in Delayed Recall Cognitive Domain ScoresMeasured at Baseline and Week 24Delayed Recall Cognitive Domain score was constructed from: HVLT Delayed Recall, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test \[30-minute Delayed Recall\], WMS-IV Logical Memory II Delayed Recall. Raw scores were transformed to z-scores (with a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1) for each test score of interest across all participants. A z-score of 0 represents the sample mean. These z-scores were then averaged to produce a Delayed Recall Cognitive Domain score. Higher Delayed Recall Cognitive Domain scores are indicative of better performance.
Change in Executive Function Cognitive Domain ScoresMeasured at Baseline and Week 24Executive Function Cognitive Domain score was constructed from: Trail Making Test A and B, Stroop Interference \[Golden version\] and FAS. Raw scores were transformed to z-scores (with a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1) for each test score of interest across all participants. A z-score of 0 represents the sample mean. These z-scores were then averaged to produce an Executive Function Cognitive Domain score. Higher Executive Function Cognitive Domain scores are indicative of better performance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Memory Functioning Questionnaire (MFQ) ScaleMeasured at Baseline and Week 24, change from baseline to week 24 is reported.Secondary outcome measures included the Memory Functioning Questionnaire (MFQ), a self-assessment scale. The MFQ is a scale that assesses subjective memory complaints. We will use the following MFQ subscales: General Frequency of Forgetting (MFQ factor 1), Seriousness of Forgetting (MFQ factor 2), and Retrospective Functions (MSQ factor 3). Each item is scored from 1 to 7 with higher scores indicating a higher level of perceived memory functioning. MSQ factor 1 (33 items) ranges from 7 to 231, MFQ factor 2 (18 items) ranges from 7-126 and MSQ factor 3 (5 items) ranges from 7 to 35.
Change in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)Measured at Baseline and Week 24, change from baseline to week 24 is reported.Health-Related quality of life will be determined using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) which comprises 8 scales: physical functioning, role limitations - physical, role limitations - emotional, energy, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain, and general health. Scales are scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

100 participants were consented and completed screen visit while 79 participants completed baseline and were randomized to either group. 10 individuals were screen fails and 11 dropped out before randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Memory Training
Group memory training will be administered for amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) Memory Training: Participants will attend a weekly memory training class for 12 weeks as well as receive daily memory homework (12 minute duration) for the 12 weeks.
39
Kundalini Yoga and Meditation
Participants will engage in weekly yoga classes and daily 12 minute meditation Kundalini yoga and meditation: Participants will participate in a 60 minute yoga and meditation session weekly for 12 weeks and will be assigned a daily Kirtan Kriya meditation (12 minute duration) for 12 weeks.
40
Total79

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMemory TrainingKundalini Yoga and MeditationTotal
Age, Continuous67.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
65.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
66.48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
36 Participants33 Participants69 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)26.66 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.48
28.02 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.29
27.34 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
27 Participants32 Participants59 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
39 participants40 participants79 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
39 Participants40 Participants79 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 390 / 40
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 393 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 390 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Delayed Recall Cognitive Domain Scores

Delayed Recall Cognitive Domain score was constructed from: HVLT Delayed Recall, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test \[30-minute Delayed Recall\], WMS-IV Logical Memory II Delayed Recall. Raw scores were transformed to z-scores (with a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1) for each test score of interest across all participants. A z-score of 0 represents the sample mean. These z-scores were then averaged to produce a Delayed Recall Cognitive Domain score. Higher Delayed Recall Cognitive Domain scores are indicative of better performance.

Time frame: Measured at Baseline and Week 24

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Memory TrainingChange in Delayed Recall Cognitive Domain Scores0.02 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.55
Kundalini Yoga and MeditationChange in Delayed Recall Cognitive Domain Scores-0.31 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.37
p-value: 0.008Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change in Executive Function Cognitive Domain Scores

Executive Function Cognitive Domain score was constructed from: Trail Making Test A and B, Stroop Interference \[Golden version\] and FAS. Raw scores were transformed to z-scores (with a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1) for each test score of interest across all participants. A z-score of 0 represents the sample mean. These z-scores were then averaged to produce an Executive Function Cognitive Domain score. Higher Executive Function Cognitive Domain scores are indicative of better performance.

Time frame: Measured at Baseline and Week 24

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Memory TrainingChange in Executive Function Cognitive Domain Scores-0.03 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.7
Kundalini Yoga and MeditationChange in Executive Function Cognitive Domain Scores-0.04 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.42
p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) Total Recall Score

Verbal memory was measured with the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) total recall scores. The HVLT form contains 12 nouns, four words each from one of three semantic categories (e.g., precious gems, articles of clothing, vegetables, etc.), to be learned over the course of three learning trials. When scoring the HVLT, the three learning trials are combined to calculate a total recall score. Total scores range from 0-36 with higher scores indicating better outcome.

Time frame: Measured at Baseline and Week 24

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Memory TrainingChange in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) Total Recall Score-0.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Kundalini Yoga and MeditationChange in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) Total Recall Score-1.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)

Health-Related quality of life will be determined using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) which comprises 8 scales: physical functioning, role limitations - physical, role limitations - emotional, energy, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain, and general health. Scales are scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.

Time frame: Measured at Baseline and Week 24, change from baseline to week 24 is reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Memory TrainingChange in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Functioning0.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.47
Memory TrainingChange in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)Role Physical-15.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.41
Memory TrainingChange in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)Role Emotional-18.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 44.16
Memory TrainingChange in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)Energy-2.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.96
Memory TrainingChange in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)Emotional Wellbeing0.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.01
Memory TrainingChange in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)Social Functioning0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.6
Memory TrainingChange in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)Pain-4.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.35
Memory TrainingChange in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)General Health1.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.33
Kundalini Yoga and MeditationChange in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)General Health-1.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.18
Kundalini Yoga and MeditationChange in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Functioning2.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.48
Kundalini Yoga and MeditationChange in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)Emotional Wellbeing-3.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Kundalini Yoga and MeditationChange in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)Role Physical3.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 39.91
Kundalini Yoga and MeditationChange in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)Pain-7.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.31
Kundalini Yoga and MeditationChange in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)Role Emotional2.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 46.01
Kundalini Yoga and MeditationChange in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)Social Functioning-9.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.29
Kundalini Yoga and MeditationChange in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)Energy0.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Memory Functioning Questionnaire (MFQ) Scale

Secondary outcome measures included the Memory Functioning Questionnaire (MFQ), a self-assessment scale. The MFQ is a scale that assesses subjective memory complaints. We will use the following MFQ subscales: General Frequency of Forgetting (MFQ factor 1), Seriousness of Forgetting (MFQ factor 2), and Retrospective Functions (MSQ factor 3). Each item is scored from 1 to 7 with higher scores indicating a higher level of perceived memory functioning. MSQ factor 1 (33 items) ranges from 7 to 231, MFQ factor 2 (18 items) ranges from 7-126 and MSQ factor 3 (5 items) ranges from 7 to 35.

Time frame: Measured at Baseline and Week 24, change from baseline to week 24 is reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Memory TrainingChange in Memory Functioning Questionnaire (MFQ) ScaleMFQ Factor 10.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Memory TrainingChange in Memory Functioning Questionnaire (MFQ) ScaleMFQ Factor 2-0.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
Memory TrainingChange in Memory Functioning Questionnaire (MFQ) ScaleMFQ Factor 30.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
Kundalini Yoga and MeditationChange in Memory Functioning Questionnaire (MFQ) ScaleMFQ Factor 10.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Kundalini Yoga and MeditationChange in Memory Functioning Questionnaire (MFQ) ScaleMFQ Factor 20.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
Kundalini Yoga and MeditationChange in Memory Functioning Questionnaire (MFQ) ScaleMFQ Factor 30.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026