Skip to content

COMBACTE-CDI Understanding the Burden of C. Difficile Infection

Combatting Bacterial Resistance in Europe - Clostridium Difficile Infections (COMBACTE-CDI, Understanding the Burden of Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03503474
Acronym
COMBACTE-CDI
Enrollment
3240
Registered
2018-04-19
Start date
2018-06-11
Completion date
2019-09-30
Last updated
2022-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clostridium Difficile Infection

Brief summary

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the most common cause of antibiotic associated diarrhoea in the western world. The infection causes significant diarrhoea, which in some cases can be serious and lead to secondary complications and even death. The infection is particularly an issue in elderly, frail patient, who are often already burdened with several other medical issues. Recent work has demonstrated that numerous cases are missed, either due to inadequate diagnostic tests or lack of clinical suspicion. The public-private partnership in COMBACTE-CDI will quantify the burden of CDI via a large, complex, multi-centre, multi-country study, and describe current management practices. An increased understanding of the CDI burden across Europe and better understanding of transmission of the organism will provide a basis for the further development of public health interventions and practices. Based on a previous successful study model (EUCLID), hospitals/laboratories of interest which carry out diagnostic testing of samples from both in-patients and community patients (including Long-Term Care Facilities patients) will be approached for inclusion in the study. Samples sent to the sites on the selected study date (regardless of test requested) will be tested at a central laboratory for CDI to look for missed cases of CDI. A follow up case/control study will collect data on outcomes and risk factors. Data will be used to construct transmission models and cost effective-ness models. Ultimately, a best practice model for CDI management will be developed.

Interventions

OTHERNo intervention

There is no intervention, this is observational only

Sponsors

Innovative Medicines Initiative
CollaboratorOTHER
UMC Utrecht
CollaboratorOTHER
Leiden University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
National laboratory for Health, Environment and Food, Slovenia
CollaboratorOTHER
Universitätsklinikum Köln
CollaboratorOTHER
Universiteit Antwerpen
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute for Infectious Diseases 'Lazzaro Sapllanzani', Italy
CollaboratorOTHER
Universität Tübingen
CollaboratorOTHER
Pfizer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
GlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
BioMérieux
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
AstraZeneca
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Da Volterra
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Leeds
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Anyone who has a diarrhoeal faecal sample submitted to the laboratories in the study for testing on the day of interest, regardless of test requested

Exclusion criteria

* Any repeat samples

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Number of Cases of CDISamples were received between July and December 2018 (at time of diarrheal episode) and test performed during that timeframe to identify the number of CDI cases (positive test result) and the number of CDI negative controls (negative test result).This outcome measure is to indicate the number of participants with a sample that returned a positive test result (=CDI cases) at the coordinating laboratory from the overall total number of participants. The number of CDI cases and negative controls are the number of participants with a sample that returned a positive or negative test result, respectively. Therefore the CDI negative controls arm did not return a positive test result. The proportion of participants that returned a positive test result compared to the total of participants (=number of participants in the CDI cases arm divided by the number of total participants in both arms) can be inferred from this outcome measure.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Anyone who has a diarrhoeal faecal sample submitted to the laboratories in the study for testing on the day of interest, regardless of test requested. The result of this observational study did not impact on patient treatment and management at the submitting laboratories.

Pre-assignment details

Residual samples received during the study period were tested for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) at the coordinating laboratory. Informed consent is not required for the use of anonymised residual material. The number of CDI cases and negative controls are the number of participants with a sample that returned a positive or negative test result, respectively. Duplicate samples were excluded and therefore not completed. Test result was not reported back to the laboratories.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CDI Cases
No intervention: There is no intervention, this is observational only
94
CDI Negative Controls
No intervention: There is no intervention, this is observational only
444
Total538

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalCDI Negative ControlsCDI Cases
30 days mortality rate38 Participants24 Participants14 Participants
Age, Customized58 years55 years72 years
Contact with healthcare facilities in the preceding 6 months to the sample243 Participants183 Participants60 Participants
Exposure to at least one antibiotic in the preceding 12 weeks to the sample231 Participants174 Participants57 Participants
Healthcare settings Community at time of sample collection161 Participants143 Participants18 Participants
Healthcare settings Hospital at time of sample collection377 Participants301 Participants76 Participants
Hospital admission within 30 days of sample56 Participants43 Participants13 Participants
Number of days of diarrhoea before the sample3 days3 days3 days
Number of recurrent (previous) CDI6 Participants0 Participants6 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
13 participants13 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
27 participants24 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
5 participants4 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ireland
4 participants3 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
56 participants43 participants13 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
11 participants9 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
50 participants38 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
75 participants57 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
10 participants8 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
106 participants93 participants13 participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
20 participants15 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
161 participants137 participants24 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
254 Participants203 Participants51 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
284 Participants241 Participants43 Participants
Two or more co-morbidities194 Participants138 Participants56 Participants
White cell count per microliter11200 10^9 cells/μL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9500
10300 10^9 cells/μL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8000
14800 10^9 cells/μL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13600

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
14 / 8824 / 401
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

The Number of Cases of CDI

This outcome measure is to indicate the number of participants with a sample that returned a positive test result (=CDI cases) at the coordinating laboratory from the overall total number of participants. The number of CDI cases and negative controls are the number of participants with a sample that returned a positive or negative test result, respectively. Therefore the CDI negative controls arm did not return a positive test result. The proportion of participants that returned a positive test result compared to the total of participants (=number of participants in the CDI cases arm divided by the number of total participants in both arms) can be inferred from this outcome measure.

Time frame: Samples were received between July and December 2018 (at time of diarrheal episode) and test performed during that timeframe to identify the number of CDI cases (positive test result) and the number of CDI negative controls (negative test result).

Population: The number of CDI cases and negative controls are the number of participants with a sample that returned a positive or negative test result, respectively. Therefore the CDI negative controls arms did not return a positive test result.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CDI CasesThe Number of Cases of CDI103 Participants
CDI Negative ControlsThe Number of Cases of CDI0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026