Skip to content

Comparison of 2 Techniques of Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion

Clinical Trial Comparing 2 Techniques of Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03503448
Acronym
SARME
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-04-19
Start date
2018-05-07
Completion date
2019-08-05
Last updated
2020-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion, Maxillar Hypoplasia, Transverse Maxillary Deficiency

Keywords

surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion, surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion, Malocclusion

Brief summary

This study evaluates 2 Techniques of Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion (SARME) in the treatment of maxillary transverse deficiency. Half of participants will undergo an osteotomy between the maxillary central incisors, while the other half will undergo an osteotomy between the maxillary lateral incisors and canines (bilateral osteotomies).

Detailed description

Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion (SARME) can be performed by a osteotomy between the maxillary central incisors and by osteotomies between the maxillary lateral incisors and canines (bilateral). Both techniques treat transverse maxillary hypoplasia, but they do so with different effects on esthetics, periodontium, teeth and bone expansion.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOsteotomy between the maxillary central incisors

Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion with osteotomy between the central incisors.

PROCEDUREOsteotomy between the maxillary lateral incisors and canines

Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion with bilateral osteotomy between the lateral incisors and canines

Sponsors

Hospital Universitario Pedro Ernesto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

patients with bilateral cross-bite and bilateral transverse maxillary deficiencies equal to or greater than 6 mm -

Exclusion criteria

Patients with previous histories of maxillary surgery, congenital craniofacial malformations, unilateral transverse maxillary deficiencies and absence of teeth in the maxilla. \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone expansion and dental inclination1-2 months post-expansion.Assessment of bone expansion and dental inclination through Cone Beam computed tomography (CBCT) images

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient´s perception2 months post-expansion.Patient´s cosmetic perception of his or her smile on a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents total dissatisfaction and 10 represents total satisfaction with the postoperative smile.
Periodontal effects2 months post-expansion.Assessment of periodontal changes in the teeth adjacent to the segmentation, through periodontal probing
Surgery timeDuring surgeryTime elapsed during surgery.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026