Skip to content

Efficacy of the Use of Dry Needling in Conventional Non-invasive Treatment of Acute and Subacute Whiplash

Efficacy of the Use of Dry Needling in Conventional Non-invasive Treatment of Acute and Subacute Whiplash

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03502928
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-04-19
Start date
2019-11-04
Completion date
2020-06-10
Last updated
2020-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Whiplash Injuries

Keywords

Dry Needling, Manual Therapy, Motor Control, Whiplash

Brief summary

INTRODUCTION: Whiplash is an injury produced by an acceleration-deceleration mechanism that transmits energy to the cervical spine. According to the bibliography, the conservative treatment (motor control exercises and manual therapy) has shown benefits in approaching this lesion, but its efficacy is limited. Dry needling has already shown its usefulness in different musculoskeletal pathologies, however, its efficacy is unknown when it is included in conservative treatment. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to assess the effects of the incorporation of dry needling in the conventional treatment with manual therapy and motor control exercises, compared to the conventional non-invasive treatment in patients with acute or subacute whiplash. HYPOTHESIS: The inclusion of dry needling in conventional non-invasive treatment is more effective than conventional non-invasive treatment in patients with acute or subacute whiplash. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial will be conducted in which the subjects of study will be assigned to two groups, a control group (conventional treatment) and an experimental group (conventional treatment and dry needling).

Interventions

Neck Motor Control

OTHERManual Therapy

Massage + Joint Mobilizations

OTHERDry Needling

Dry Needling in Neck Muscles

Sponsors

University of Alcala
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Medical Diagnosis of Whiplash Grade I-II in the QTF * Neck Pain * Whiplash in Acute or Subacute Phase

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Belonephobia * Cervical Fractures-Dislocations or Neurological Deficit Secondaries to Accident * Previous Surgery of the Cervical Spine * Circulatory Disease, Respiratory Disease, Neurological Disease, Rheumatologic Disease and Mental Illness * Athletes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neck Disability Index. Changes from Baseline3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months0-100% (0% = No Disability; 100% = Disability (highest level of disability)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pressure pain thresholds. Changes from Baseline3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 monthsThe minimum force applied which induces pain. Measured kg/cm2
Cervical Range of Movement. Changes from Baseline3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 monthsAmount of cervical movement using a goniometer
Kinesophobia. Changes from Baseline3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 monthsFear of movement measured by the TAMPA scale
Cervical Motor Control. Changes from Baseline3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 monthsmeasure of cervical joint position sense using a laser

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026