Skip to content

Multilevel Interventions to Enhance Provider Recommendations for HPV Vaccination

Less Pain, Less Fuss, Right Now! and Make It Count!--Multilevel Interventions for Patient, Parent, and Practice to Enhance Provider Recommendations for HPV Vaccination

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03501992
Enrollment
9242
Registered
2018-04-18
Start date
2018-04-01
Completion date
2023-09-01
Last updated
2024-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Papillomavirus Vaccines

Keywords

Papillomavirus vaccines, Vaccination, Patient acceptance of health care, Child, Parents, Primary health care, Health personnel, Primary prevention, Neoplasms

Brief summary

Each year the human papillomavirus (HPV) causes 30,000 cancers in the United States despite the availability of very effective and safe vaccines. Uptake of the HPV vaccine has been disappointingly low and lags behind other adolescent vaccines. This study seeks to test interventions targeting health care system, provider, and patient factors to improve the population uptake of the HPV vaccine.

Detailed description

The broad, long-term objective is to substantially increase human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates by deploying effective population-health interventions in clinical practices across the United States. As part of this effort, the investigators intend to evaluate two evidence-based interventions with innovative enhancements at six Mayo Clinic primary care practices (PCP) to evaluate their individual and combined impact on rates of HPV vaccination among female and male patients. Aim 1, Less Pain, Less Fuss, Right Now!, will test the hypothesis that, as compared to no intervention (current practice), a practice-level intervention utilizing reminder-recalls featuring the availability of non-medication and medication anesthetics, the convenience of nurse-only visits, and the use of persuasive language for early, on-time vaccinations will improve HPV vaccine delivery rates. Aim 2, Make It Count!, will test the hypothesis that, as compared to no intervention, a provider level intervention utilizing a missed-opportunities assessment and feedback intervention applying social pressure (specific peer-performance comparisons) and equipping providers with a strong-recommendation toolkit will improve HPV vaccine delivery rates. Aim 3 will test the hypothesis that simultaneous implementation of interventions targeting individual, interpersonal, and organizational factors will have a synergistic effect on HPV vaccine delivery rates. To accomplish Aims 1-3, the investigators will use a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial with an integrated process evaluation. The cluster approach prevents cross-contamination between patients or providers as we allocate two separate interventions (Aims 1 and 2) in the six PCPs. The stepped-wedge design, which ensures all practices eventually receive the same set of interventions, permits the single institutional review board overseeing all six PCPs to approve the study without requiring recruitment and consent of individual patients or providers. The stepped-wedge approach also permits the investigators to test the presence of each of the interventions in each PCP, making trial participation more attractive, while also allowing each practice to serve as its own control, reducing the bias due to imbalanced risk factors across practices. The factorial design allows the investigators to use a single trial to test two interventions and assess each individually and in combination. The design also conserves sample size while maintaining power. The investigators will measure the impact separately in females and males, 11-12 years of age for the rates of receipt of HPV vaccine doses due. Rigorously tested, highly effective, population-level interventions are essential if the US is to reach the Healthy People 2020 goal for HPV vaccination. The rigor, design, and high likelihood of success of this study will provide key evidence regarding practice- and provider-level interventions to improve HPV vaccination rates. Mayo Clinic's best practices inform not only its own 70 practices across five states but its Mayo Clinic Care Network, which consists of nearly 40 health-care organizations across 26 states and Puerto Rico.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCurrent care

The current care arm consists of the contemporary efforts now in practice to support provider recommendation including a shared, standard immunization schedule, a shared rooming process, a shared well child visit schedule, a shared electronic prompt at point-of-care of vaccines due.

BEHAVIORALReminder-recall

The communication will use expectant (announcement-style or presumptive) language noting the child's HPV vaccination status and stating that the child's provider strongly recommends the child receive the HPV vaccination now. The communication will also describe availability of topical anesthetics (less pain), indicate the availability and convenience of nurse visits for HPV vaccination (less fuss), and describe the immunological and logistical benefits of early vaccination (right now).

The intervention includes two components. The first is a missed opportunities audit-and-feedback. The second is a provision of a strong recommendation provider-toolkit, along with a broad education of the practice staff-nurses, medical secretaries, receptionists, and clinical assistants-regarding the nature of the intervention, its goals, and its likely impact on the practice. The broad education will be conducted through supervisory communications only to practice staff in practices allocated to the intervention at the beginning of the step.

BEHAVIORALCombined reminder-recall and audit-and-feedback

The combination reminder-and-audit arm consists of a simultaneous application of the intervention tested in the reminder-recall arm and the intervention tested in the audit-and-feedback arm.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The data analyst will conduct the measurement of the patients eligible and vaccinated and the calculations of the outcomes. The investigators will blind the data analyst to which intervention(s) each practice was assigned to receive. However that only masks the practices' interventions for Step 2 and Step 3 as all practices receive the same interventions in Step 1 (current care) and Step 4 (combined reminder-audit).

Intervention model description

A factorial, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial with process evaluation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Empaneled in one of the six participating primary care practices * 11 to 12 years of age at the first day of each of the 12-month-long steps * Due during that 12-month-long step for at least one dose of the HPV vaccine

Exclusion criteria

* Not empaneled in one of the six participating practices * Empaneled in one of the six participating practices but less than 11 years of age or more than 12 years of age on the first day of each 12 month long step * Not due during that 12-month-long step for a dose of HPV vaccine.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Human Papillomavirus or HPV-vaccine-dose ReceiptThe dose had to have been received during the 12-month-long study step.The outcome measure was the proportion of empaneled, HPV-vaccine-dose eligible males and females in the study step who received the dose of HPV vaccine dose due by the end of the study step.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
InitiationThe initiating dose had to have been received during the 12-month-long study step.The outcome measure was the proportion of empaneled, HPV-vaccine-dose eligible males and females due for their first doses of the HPV vaccine series in the study step who received the first dose of HPV vaccine dose due by the end of the study step, thus initiating the HPV vaccine series.
CompletionThe final dose had to have been received during the 12-month-long study step.The outcome measure was the proportion of empaneled, HPV-vaccine-dose eligible males and females due for their final doses of the HPV vaccine series in the study step who received the final dose of HPV vaccine dose due by the end of the study step, thus completing the HPV vaccine series.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
HPV-vaccine-dose Receipt in FemalesThe dose had to have been received during the 12-month-long study step.The outcome measure was the proportion of empaneled, HPV-vaccine-dose eligible females in the study step who received the dose of HPV vaccine dose due by the end of the study step.
HPV-vaccine-dose Receipt in MalesThe dose had to have been received during the 12-month-long study step.The outcome measure was the proportion of empaneled, HPV-vaccine-dose eligible males in the study step who received the dose of HPV vaccine dose due by the end of the study step.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

During each trial month for each practice, we identified patients both age- and dose-eligible. To become age eligible for a particular trial month and for the rest of the step, the patient must turn 11 or 12 years of age during the calendar month that preceded the calendar month before the given trial month. To be dose eligible for the same period, the patient must be due for an HPV vaccine dose in the month following their 11th or 12th birthday (ie, the month prior to the relevant trial month).

Pre-assignment details

A patient empaneled to a practice who was both age and dose eligible for one 12-month step may become age and dose eligible in the following 12-month step. We included patients in a step who were age and dose eligible for a preceding step who remained empaneled to a practice and became age and dose eligible in the next step. The dose eligibility may result from either still being due for the first, initial HPV vaccine dose or now being due for the second, final HPV vaccine dose. Others aged out.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Usual Care
Adolescents who turned 11 or 12 years of age, due for a dose of the human papillomavirus vaccine, empaneled in one of the six participating practices that were allocated for the duration of either step 1 or 2 to usual care.
3,572
Parent Reminder-Recall Letter
Adolescents who turned 11 or 12 years of age, due for a dose of the human papillomavirus vaccine, empaneled in one of the six participating practices that were allocated for the duration of steps 2 or 3 to the parent reminder-recall letter intervention.
1,670
Provider Audit-Feedback Intervention.
Adolescents who turned 11 or 12 years of age, due for a dose of the human papillomavirus vaccine, empaneled in one of the six participating practices that were allocated for the duration of steps 2 or 3 to the provider audit-feedback intervention.
1,340
Combination of Parent Reminder-Recall Letter and Provider Audit-Feedback Interventions
Adolescents who turned 11 or 12 years of age, due for a dose of the human papillomavirus vaccine, empaneled in one of the six participating practices that were allocated for the duration of steps 3 and 4 to the combination of parent reminder-recall letter and provider audit-feedback interventions.
2,660
Total9,242

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalParent Reminder-Recall LetterProvider Audit-Feedback Intervention.Combination of Parent Reminder-Recall Letter and Provider Audit-Feedback InterventionsUsual Care
Age, Customized
11 years old
5165 Participants943 Participants741 Participants1497 Participants1984 Participants
Age, Customized
12 years old
4077 Participants727 Participants599 Participants1163 Participants1588 Participants
Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Status
Completing the HPV vaccine series
2686 Participants503 Participants394 Participants955 Participants834 Participants
Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Status
Initiating the HPV vaccine series
6556 Participants1167 Participants946 Participants1705 Participants2738 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
430 Participants75 Participants51 Participants107 Participants197 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
832 Participants179 Participants92 Participants232 Participants329 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
215 Participants51 Participants18 Participants75 Participants71 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1067 Participants204 Participants143 Participants262 Participants458 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
6698 Participants1161 Participants1036 Participants1984 Participants2517 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
9242 participants1670 participants1340 participants2660 participants3572 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4394 Participants799 Participants648 Participants1280 Participants1667 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4848 Participants871 Participants692 Participants1380 Participants1905 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Human Papillomavirus or HPV-vaccine-dose Receipt

The outcome measure was the proportion of empaneled, HPV-vaccine-dose eligible males and females in the study step who received the dose of HPV vaccine dose due by the end of the study step.

Time frame: The dose had to have been received during the 12-month-long study step.

Population: The overall number of participants analyzed summed the numbers of the empaneled, HPV-vaccine-eligible males and females in each of the study steps in each of the practices assigned to the intervention (arm/group). For example, we allocated all six practices to Usual Care in Step 1 and two practices to Usual Care in Step 2. The numbers from those eight practices add up to the overall number of participants analyzed for the Usual Care Arm/Group, which is 3572.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareHuman Papillomavirus or HPV-vaccine-dose Receipt782 Participants
Parent Reminder-Recall LetterHuman Papillomavirus or HPV-vaccine-dose Receipt578 Participants
Provider Audit-Feedback Intervention.Human Papillomavirus or HPV-vaccine-dose Receipt408 Participants
Combination of Parent Reminder-Recall Letter and Provider Audit-Feedback InterventionsHuman Papillomavirus or HPV-vaccine-dose Receipt1056 Participants
Secondary

Completion

The outcome measure was the proportion of empaneled, HPV-vaccine-dose eligible males and females due for their final doses of the HPV vaccine series in the study step who received the final dose of HPV vaccine dose due by the end of the study step, thus completing the HPV vaccine series.

Time frame: The final dose had to have been received during the 12-month-long study step.

Population: The overall number of participants analyzed summed the numbers of the empaneled, HPV-vaccine-eligible males and females due for their final doses in each of the study steps in each of the practices assigned to the intervention (arm/group). For example, we allocated all six practices to Usual Care in Step 1 and two practices to Usual Care in Step 2. The numbers from those eight practices add up to the overall number of participants analyzed for the Usual Care Arm/Group, which is 834.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareCompletion300 Participants
Parent Reminder-Recall LetterCompletion249 Participants
Provider Audit-Feedback Intervention.Completion157 Participants
Combination of Parent Reminder-Recall Letter and Provider Audit-Feedback InterventionsCompletion566 Participants
Secondary

Initiation

The outcome measure was the proportion of empaneled, HPV-vaccine-dose eligible males and females due for their first doses of the HPV vaccine series in the study step who received the first dose of HPV vaccine dose due by the end of the study step, thus initiating the HPV vaccine series.

Time frame: The initiating dose had to have been received during the 12-month-long study step.

Population: The overall number of participants analyzed summed the numbers of the empaneled, HPV-vaccine-eligible males and females due for their first doses in each of the study steps in each of the practices assigned to the intervention (arm/group). For example, we allocated all six practices to Usual Care in Step 1 and two practices to Usual Care in Step 2. The numbers from those eight practices add up to the overall number of participants analyzed for the Usual Care Arm/Group, which is 2738.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareInitiation482 Participants
Parent Reminder-Recall LetterInitiation329 Participants
Provider Audit-Feedback Intervention.Initiation251 Participants
Combination of Parent Reminder-Recall Letter and Provider Audit-Feedback InterventionsInitiation490 Participants
Other Pre-specified

HPV-vaccine-dose Receipt in Females

The outcome measure was the proportion of empaneled, HPV-vaccine-dose eligible females in the study step who received the dose of HPV vaccine dose due by the end of the study step.

Time frame: The dose had to have been received during the 12-month-long study step.

Population: The overall number of participants analyzed summed the numbers of the empaneled, HPV-vaccine-eligible females in each of the study steps in each of the practices assigned to the intervention (arm/group). For example, we allocated all six practices to Usual Care in Step 1 and two practices to Usual Care in Step 2. The numbers from those eight practices add up to the overall number of female participants analyzed for the Usual Care Arm/Group, which is 1667.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareHPV-vaccine-dose Receipt in Females385 Participants
Parent Reminder-Recall LetterHPV-vaccine-dose Receipt in Females296 Participants
Provider Audit-Feedback Intervention.HPV-vaccine-dose Receipt in Females188 Participants
Combination of Parent Reminder-Recall Letter and Provider Audit-Feedback InterventionsHPV-vaccine-dose Receipt in Females517 Participants
Other Pre-specified

HPV-vaccine-dose Receipt in Males

The outcome measure was the proportion of empaneled, HPV-vaccine-dose eligible males in the study step who received the dose of HPV vaccine dose due by the end of the study step.

Time frame: The dose had to have been received during the 12-month-long study step.

Population: The overall number of participants analyzed summed the numbers of the empaneled, HPV-vaccine-eligible males in each of the study steps in each of the practices assigned to the intervention (arm/group). For example, we allocated all six practices to Usual Care in Step 1 and two practices to Usual Care in Step 2. The numbers from those eight practices add up to the overall number of male participants analyzed for the Usual Care Arm/Group, which is 1905.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareHPV-vaccine-dose Receipt in Males397 Participants
Parent Reminder-Recall LetterHPV-vaccine-dose Receipt in Males282 Participants
Provider Audit-Feedback Intervention.HPV-vaccine-dose Receipt in Males220 Participants
Combination of Parent Reminder-Recall Letter and Provider Audit-Feedback InterventionsHPV-vaccine-dose Receipt in Males539 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026