Skip to content

What Factors Affect Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy?

What Are the Factors Affecting Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy in Breast Cancer? A Non-invasive in Vivo Study Using Specialist Magnetic Resonance (MR) Methods

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03501394
Enrollment
25
Registered
2018-04-18
Start date
2018-05-02
Completion date
2019-06-30
Last updated
2018-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasm Malignant Breast Tissue

Keywords

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Brief summary

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer affecting women. To treat locally advanced breast cancers, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is often carried out before surgery to reduce the tumour size to allow breast conservation surgery. However, treatment response for individual patients varies, where the tumour may not respond to treatment and the quality of patient care is compromised if the NACT treatment plan is not optimised. Therefore, the assessment of NACT efficacy is beneficial for the early identification of these patients and appropriate management of treatment. Breast tumours have unique features compared to healthy tissue, including abnormal tissue structure and biochemical composition. With NACT there are specific changes to such tumour features indicating tumour treatment response. The purpose of this study is to establish how the changes to breast tumour features following NACT treatment are seen in non-invasive imaging. This study will look at scans of breast tumours using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Changes to tissue structure will be measured by advanced diffusion MRI techniques and changes to tumour related biochemical substances will be measured by advanced magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques. The investigators aim to assess if these techniques can provide information on the tumour treatment response following subsequent rounds of NACT treatment. In this longitudinal study, 25 patients undergoing NACT will be recruited for four repeated MRI investigations over the course of NACT treatment. Magnetic resonance (MR) measurements of tissue microstructure and biochemical composition will be compared against histological measurements and radiological assessments of treatment response. The study will recruit patients undergoing treatment at the NHS Grampian. This research is funded by Friends of ANCHOR, Tenovus Scotland Grampian and the NHS Grampian Endowment Research Fund.

Detailed description

In this single group longitudinal study, the investigators propose that functional images from magnetic resonance (MR) methods performed at baseline and after 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) are in agreement with histological findings from pre-treatment biopsy and post-treatment surgically excised tissue. MR methods will be performed at baseline (pre-treatment) and after the 1st, 3rd and 6th (post-treatment) cycles of NACT treatment. The investigators hypothesise that specific physiological changes detected through MR methods are a manifestation of tumour response to NACT confirmed by histology and radiological assessment (Hypothesis 1). The investigators further hypothesise that early sensitivity to physiological changes manifesting from tumour response to NACT can be revealed by MR measurements after the first and third cycle of treatment (Hypothesis 2). Research Question 1: Is there a difference in physiological parameters revealed by MR measurements at baseline and after completion of NACT? Research Question 2: Do the physiological measurements at the completion of NACT from MR measures agree with histological findings? Research Question 3: Is there a difference between MR measurements at baseline and after the first and third cycle of NACT? Research Question 4: Is there a difference in MR measurements at baseline, first and third cycle of NACT, between positive treatment responders and non-responders. MR measurements will be compared against clinical and study specific results from histological analysis and radiological assessment of MRI, mammography and ultrasound measures of tumour treatment response. Information collected from a health questionnaire will supplement interpretation of the data. To test the effects of NACT on specific aspects of tumour physiology, paired t-tests will be performed on MR measures of lactate concentration, lipid composition and diffusion parameters, between baseline and post-treatment assessments (Research Question 1). To examine the relationship between MR measurements and histology, correlation analysis will be conducted between baseline and post-treatment assessments. MR measures will be correlated against corresponding percentage changes in histological findings between biopsy and tumour excision (Research Question 2). To evaluate MR measures as early markers of NACT efficacy, paired t-tests will be carried out between MR measures at pre-treatment and post 1st and 3rd cycles of NACT treatment (Research Question 3), with independent group difference determined between responders and non-responders (Research Question 4).

Interventions

Health and demographic information will be collected.

OTHERMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Patients will undergo 4 MRI sessions during NACT treatment. The first scan will take place at treatment baseline before their first cycle of NACT treatment. The second scan will take place following the first treatment cycle prior to the second treatment cycle. Likewise, the third and last scan will take place after the third treatment cycle and sixth (final) treatment cycle prior to surgery. MRI scan sessions will be composed of research scans including diffusion and lipid profiling MR imaging methods and MR spectroscopy (MRS) methods.

Study specific analysis will be performed on the core biopsy and tissue removed in surgery following the completion of NACT treatment. Standard routine histological analysis will be performed, as well as study specific analysis for immunostaining, grading and slide scan imaging for measurement of cellularity markers.

Sponsors

NHS Grampian
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Aberdeen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Single group with one arm and no masking.

Intervention model description

Single group longitudinal study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with pathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Condition to contradictive to MRI investigation with contrast agent (poor renal function, contrast agent allergy, metal implants or pace maker). * Started hormone or chemotherapy treatment before recruitment. * Undergoing treatment for concurrent cancer diagnosis. * Marker coil contradictive to MRI investigation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post Treatment: Fat Fraction (units of %)Scan at the end of Cycle 6 (Each cycle is 21 days)Fat Fraction with units of %
Post Treatment: Lactate Concentration (units of mM)Scan at the end of Cycle 6 (Each cycle is 21 days)Lactate concentration with units of mM
Baseline: Lipid Peak Volume Ratio (Ratio Units)Scan at pre-treatment baseline (Prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days)Lipid peak volume ratio value with units of ratio
Post Cycle 1: Lipid Peak Volume Ratio (Ratio Units)Scan at the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle is 21 days)Lipid peak volume ratio value with units of ratio
Baseline: Fat Fraction (units of %)Scan at pre-treatment baseline (Prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days)Fat Fraction with units of %
Post Cycle 1: Fat Fraction (units of %)Scan at the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle is 21 days)Fat Fraction with units of %
Post Cycle 3: Fat Fraction (units of %)Scan at the end of Cycle 3 (Each cycle is 21 days)Fat Fraction with units of %
Post Cycle 3: Lipid Peak Volume Ratio (Ratio Units)Scan at the end of Cycle 3 (Each cycle is 21 days)Lipid peak volume ratio value with units of ratio
Post Treatment: Lipid Peak Volume Ratio (Ratio Units)Scan at the end of Cycle 6 (Each cycle is 21 days)Lipid peak volume ratio value with units of ratio
Baseline: Water diffusion probability density function (Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum, FWHM, units of micrometre)Scan at pre-treatment baseline (Prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days)The water diffusion probability density function will be quantified by the Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum with units of micrometre
Post Cycle 1: Water diffusion probability density function (Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum, FWHM, units of micrometre)Scan at the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle is 21 days)The water diffusion probability density function will be quantified by the Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum with units of micrometre
Post Cycle 3: Water diffusion probability density function (Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum, FWHM, units of micrometre)Scan at the end of Cycle 3 (Each cycle is 21 days)The water diffusion probability density function will be quantified by the Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum with units of micrometre
Post Treatment: Water diffusion probability density function (Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum, FWHM, units of micrometre)Scan at the end of Cycle 6 (Each cycle is 21 days)The water diffusion probability density function will be quantified by the Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum with units of micrometre
Baseline: Water diffusivity (units of mm^2 /s)Scan at pre-treatment baseline (Prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days)Water diffusivity with units of mm\^2 /s
Post Cycle 1: Water diffusivity (units of mm^2 /s)Scan at the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle is 21 days)Water diffusivity with units of mm\^2 /s
Post Cycle 3: Water diffusivity (units of mm^2 /s)Scan at the end of Cycle 3 (Each cycle is 21 days)Water diffusivity with units of mm\^2 /s
Post Treatment: Water diffusivity (units of mm^2 /s)Scan at the end of Cycle 6 (Each cycle is 21 days)Water diffusivity with units of mm\^2 /s
Baseline: Lactate Concentration (units of mM)Scan at pre-treatment baseline (Prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days)Lactate concentration with units of mM
Post Cycle 1: Lactate Concentration (units of mM)Scan at the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle is 21 days)Lactate concentration with units of mM
Post Cycle 3: Lactate Concentration (units of mM)Scan at the end of Cycle 3 (Each cycle is 21 days)Lactate concentration with units of mM

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Excised Tumour Tissue: Ki-67 Staining Percentage (units of %)Post-treatment surgery excision (Post Cycle 6, each cycle is 21 days). Assessed following the completion of routine pathological reporting of the excised tissue.Ki-67 staining percentage with units of %, assessed on excised tissue taken from surgery following completion of treatment cycles.
Core Biopsy Tumour Tissue: Serotonin Staining Score (arbitrary units)Pre-treatment baseline biopsy (Taken prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days). Assessed following completion of treatment cycles and the routine reporting of core biopsy and excised tissue samples.Serotonin staining score with arbitrary units (multiplication of staining percentage and stain intensity scored 1 - 3), assessed on core biopsy tissue taken prior to start of treatment cycles.
Excised Tumour Tissue: Serotonin Staining Score (arbitrary units)Post-treatment surgery excision (Post Cycle 6, each cycle is 21 days). Assessed following the completion of routine pathological reporting of the excised tissue.Serotonin staining score with arbitrary units (multiplication of staining percentage and stain intensity scored 1 - 3), assessed on excised tissue taken from surgery following completion of treatment cycles.
Core Biopsy Tumour Tissue: Cellularity (units of %)Pre-treatment baseline biopsy (Taken prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days). Assessed following completion of treatment cycles and the routine reporting of core biopsy and excised tissue samples.Cellularity with units of %, assessed on core biopsy taken prior to start of treatment cycles.
Excised Tumour Tissue: Cellularity (units of %)Post-treatment surgery excision (Post Cycle 6, each cycle is 21 days). Assessed following the completion of routine pathological reporting of the excised tissue.Cellularity with units of %, assessed on excised tissue taken from surgery following completion of treatment cycles.
Core Biopsy Tumour Tissue: Ki-67 Staining Percentage (units of %)Pre-treatment baseline biopsy (Taken prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days). Assessed following completion of treatment cycles and the routine reporting of core biopsy and excised tissue samples.Ki-67 staining percentage with units of %, assessed on core biopsy tissue taken prior to start of treatment cycles.

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactNicholas Senn, MPhys
r03ns15@abdn.ac.uk+44 (0)1224 438351
Backup ContactJiabao He, PhD
jiabao.he@abdn.ac.uk+44 (0)1224 437321

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026