Skip to content

Comparison of Different Materials Contribution to Implants Stability

Comparison of Different Materials Contribution to Immediate Implants Stability With Resonance Frequency Analysis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03501199
Enrollment
15
Registered
2018-04-18
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
2019-03-04
Last updated
2019-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Implant Failure Nos

Keywords

immediate implant placement

Brief summary

The investigators will use two types of material(PRF-Xenograft) in the buccal gap after immediate dental implant placement. The study design has three groups PRF, graft, and control group. The patients will randomly be assigned to groups by envelop method. The resonance frequency analysis device(Osstell) will be used to measure primary and secondary stabilization. Then the investigators will evaluate each materials' contribution to stability. Pre-op and 9th month Post-op CBCTs will evaluate about bone loss in mesial-distal and horizontal dimensions.

Interventions

OTHERplatelet-rich fibrin placement

filling the buccal gap with platelet-rich fibrin after immediate dental implant placement

OTHERxenogenic graft placement

filling the buccal gap with xenogenic graft after immediate dental implant placement

OTHERno extra material

filling the buccal gap with no material after immediate dental implant placement

PROCEDUREtooth extraction

extraction of tooth which is unrestorable

PROCEDUREimmediate implant placement

putting dental implant into a socket which has been prepared with compatible drills

OTHERcollagen membran placement

placing collagen membran on extraction socket after dental implant placement to cover all

PROCEDUREraising flap

raising the buccal flap with two vertical incision to cover extraction socket for primary closure

Sponsors

Necmettin Erbakan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* medically healthy, * only one maxillary aesthetic region(incisors or premolars) tooth which has two adjacent teeth is indicated for extraction. * intact buccal socket walls * the gap between buccal socket wall to implant sholder at least 2 mm.

Exclusion criteria

* relevant tooth has more than one root, * smoking, * alcohol abuse, * pregnancy, * immune-suppressive patients, * any systemic disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primer Stabilization-Resonance Frequency Analysisat 0 dayinitial measurement after placement by Osstell device

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Seconder Stabilization-Resonance Frequency Analysis120th daysecondary measurement after placement by Osstell device
Mesial-Distal and Horizontal Bone Loss9th monthThe alveolar bone loss between first day to 9th month

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026