Skip to content

An Addiction-Based Mobile Health Weight Loss Intervention With Coaching

An Addiction Model Based Mobile Health Weight Loss Intervention With Coaching in Adolescents With Overweight and Obesity: Multi-Site Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03500835
Enrollment
161
Registered
2018-04-18
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
2023-12-19
Last updated
2024-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Addiction, Mobile Technology, Pediatric Obesity

Brief summary

The proposed multi-site randomized control trial (RCT) will test the effectiveness of an addiction-based weight loss intervention, embodied first as a smartphone app with telephone coaching and second as an identical approach phone-coaching alone intervention compared to age matched controls participating in an in-clinic weight management interventions in a larger sample of economically, racially and ethnically diverse adolescents (ages 14-18). One hundred and eighty adolescents will be recruited from pediatric interdisciplinary weight management clinics operating out of five different hospital systems in Southern California and through targeted mailing to 40 ethnically, racially and economically diverse neighborhoods in Los Angeles County. The adolescents will be randomized 1:1 via stratified block randomization to either receive 1) interactive addiction model based mobile health (mHealth) weight-loss intervention with personalized phone-coaching (AppCoach), 2) interactive addiction model based mHealth weight-loss intervention alone (App) or 3) Multidisciplinary in-clinic weight management program (Clinic). Assessment of the intervention's effect on zBMI and percent over the 95th percentile (%BMIp95), fasting metabolic parameters, addictive eating habits, executive function, and motivation for change will be obtained at enrollment, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months (1 year post intervention follow up).

Detailed description

Aim 1 (Primary Outcomes): To test the effectiveness of an addiction-based weight loss intervention, embodied first as a smartphone app with telephone coaching (AppCoach) compared to (1) addiction model based weight-loss app alone (App) and (2) multi-disciplinary in-clinic weight loss intervention (Clinic) on weight outcomes of overweight and obese adolescents at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post enrollment. Hypothesis 1a: Participants who complete the six month AppCoach will have a greater decrease in their zBMI and %BMIp95 compared to baseline at completion of the 6 months intervention, than those receiving App or Clinic. Hypothesis 1b: Participants who completed the six month AppCoach will have greater decrease in their zBMI and %BMIp95 compared to baseline at 6 and 12 months post intervention completion compared to App and Clinic. Aim 2 (Secondary Outcomes): To compare the effects of AppCoach on addictive eating behaviors, motivation and self-regulatory behaviors at completion of the intervention and 6 and 12 months post intervention. Hypothesis 2: Compared to App or Clinic, AppCoach will result in lower YFAS-c scores, higher motivation and improved self- regulatory behaviors scores when evaluated at completion of the intervention and 6 and 12 months post intervention. Aim 3 (Mediators): To test whether baseline traits and behaviors mediate the effect of AppCoach compared to App and Clinic. Hypothesis 3: Higher baseline YFAS-c scores lower executive function scores and previous history with mobile platforms will mediate the efficacy of AppCoach and App. Aim 4: To conduct a real-life economic analysis (costs, cost-savings and non-monetary benefits) of delivering AppCoach compared to 1) App and 2) Clinic. Hypothesis 4: An addiction-based weight loss mHealth intervention will be more cost-effective than weight-loss coaching alone and in-person delivery of multidisciplinary weight-loss intervention. Research Design Methods: Study Design: Multi-center, randomized, controlled, trial of an addiction based mobile health (mHealth) weight loss intervention plus personalized coaching (AppCoach) compared to receive 1)interactive addiction model based mHealth weight-loss intervention alone (App) and 2) Multidisciplinary in-clinic weight management program (Clinic). Recruitment and Eligibility: Study procedures will be approved by the Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA), the Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Alta Med, UCLA, and Cedars Sinai Institutional Review Boards. Participants will be recruited for the intervention arms from newly referred patients of 5 interdisciplinary weight management clinics (CHLA, Alta Med, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA (LA Biomed), UCLA, and Cedars Sinai). Patient Subjects: Inclusion criteria include: 1\. Age 14-18 years 2. Body mass index \[BMI\] ≥85th percentile for age and gender Exclusion criteria include: 1. Concurrent participation in an alternative weight loss intervention 2. Blood pressure \> 99th percentile for age, gender, and height 3. Known psychiatric illness and/or developmental delay 4. Participants Inability to read English Parent Criteria: 1. Have an eligible child who meets the eligibility requirements listed above 2. Minimum age of 18 years old Pre-Screening: Clinic Recruitment: Newly referred patients to the interdisciplinary clinics will be pre-screened for eligibility prior to their first clinic visit by an on-site clinical research coordinator (CRC). Those participants who meet eligibility criteria will be contacted via phone by the on-site CRC. The CRC will briefly introduce the study aims and intervention and request the youth and family to consider participation to be fully discussed at the first visit. The CRC will obtain the eligible participants' email address and send them a recruitment email. Initial Visit: 1. On-site CRC will meet with eligible participants and provide details about the study procedures, obtain written consent from one parent/guardian and assent from each participant and answer any questions the participants and there parent may have. a. In order to standardize the study description, the CRC will first play an introductory video clip describing the study, the participant responsibilities and follow-up requirements. b. Upon obtaining verbal and written consent from one parent or guardian and verbal and written assent from each youth to participate in the study participants will be randomized to one of 3 intervention arms (AppCoach vs. App vs. Clinic) 2. All consenting participants will complete a battery of surveys (Refer to Measurements section). Covariates/Moderators: a. Yale Food Addiction Scale b. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale c. The Perceived Stress Scale d. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive function Outcomes: 1. Intervention Satisfaction Survey 2. The Adolescent Self-Regulatory Inventory (ASRI) 3. Food Cravings Questionnaire 3. All consenting participants: 1. AppCoach and App Groups will receive: 1\. iPhones (as needed; participants will be required to have an iPhone). b. All Participants will receive: Wireless Bluetooth body weight scale (Wahoo Fitness Balance Scale; Wahoo fitness, Atlanta, GA) and a wireless Bluetooth digital food scale (Escali Smart Connect Kitchen Scale, Escali Corp., Burnsville, MN) both of which interfaced to the app. c. Participants who require an iPhone will be loaned an iPhone 5S and accessories (including protective case), with an AT&T service plan for the duration of the study that includes: unlimited texting, unlimited plan, unlimited voice calls to and from other cell telephones, 700 voice call minutes for calls to and from landlines, unlimited night and weekend calls to and from landlines, International calls or texts including Canada are NOT allowed and not covered. d. Participants will return the loaned phones at the completion of the intervention (Visit 3). e. The referring provider will receive a letter informing them that the youth they referred to the weight management clinic will be participating in this study for 6 months and then will be offered enrollment back into the initial referral program is desired. 4\. AppCoach Participants: 1. Each participant will register via a computer and then login with the app. 2. Participants will weigh-in on a scale in a private area and enter weight data on their iPhones. 3. On-site CRC will go through each section of app and have participants enter data. 4. Follow Up: Participants will schedule weekly 15 minute phone meetings with a coach and return for clinic visits at 3,6,12 and 18 months. The first phone visit will be via HIPAA secure video conferencing between the coach and the participant. 5\. App Participants: a. Each participant will register via a computer and then login with the app. b. Participants will weigh-in on a scale in a private area and enter weight data on their iPhones. c. On-site CRC will go through each section of app and have participants enter data. d. Follow Up: Participants will schedule clinic visits at 3,6,12 and 18 months. 6. Clinic Participants: 1. Each participant will attend a multi-disciplinary in-clinic intervention that consists of 6 sessions (100 minutes for the first visit and 80 minutes for follow up visits). 2. They will travel to the local site of recruitment and attend 6 sessions in which they will meet with a provider team. 3. Participants will weigh-in on a scale in a private area and receive a wireless body and food scale 4. Follow Up: Participants will return clinic visits monthly for 6 months and then at 12 and 18 months post consent for maintenance follow-up.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALApp

1. 6 month app intervention: Problem Food Withdrawal, Snacking Elimination and Food Amount Reduction 2. Daily Weigh In 3. App based reminders 4. Follow Up: Face-to-face clinic visits at 3,6,12 and 18 months.

BEHAVIORALCoaching

1. 6 month addiction based intervention: Problem Food Withdrawal, Snacking Elimination and Food Amount Reduction. 2. Daily Weighing 3. Daily Text messages from Coach 4. Weekly 15 minute phone meetings with Coach 5. Follow Up: Face-to-face clinic visits at 3,6,12 and 18 months post consent

BEHAVIORALClinic: Modified KidsNFitness

1. 6 month in-clinic, evidence-based, multi-disciplinary intervention 2. 90 minute sessions, in clinic that occur every month for 6 months 3. Follow Up: Face-to-face clinic visits Monthly x 6 months followed by face-to-face visit at12 and 18 months.

Sponsors

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, Los Angeles
CollaboratorOTHER
Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Blocked randomization will be utilized, to ensure the groups are balanced in terms of number of subjects and the distribution of potential confounding variables. Blocked randomization will be used to ensure the number of eligible subjects assigned to each group is equally distributed. Block size will be blinded from the primary investigator performing the study.

Intervention model description

The proposed multi-site randomized control trial (RCT) will test the effectiveness of an addiction-based weight loss intervention, embodied as a smartphone app with telephone coaching compared 1) an addiction-based weight loss intervention alone and 2) an in-clinic weight management intervention based on a traffic-light based approach in a larger sample of economically, racially and ethnically diverse adolescents (ages 14-18).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 14-18 years * Body mass index \[BMI\] ≥85th percentile for age and gender

Exclusion criteria

* Concurrent participation in an alternative weight loss intervention * Blood pressure \> 99th percentile for age, gender, and height * Known poorly controlled psychiatric illness and/or developmental delay * Participants Inability to read English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
%BMIp956 monthsMean change in excess BMI percent over the 95th percentile (%BMIp95) over the study period compared at 6 months to baseline. value at 6 months minus value at baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost Analysis6 monthsReal life economic analysis of the intervention arms compared to each other and in in-clinic intervention. The following data were collected throughout the study period to assess the implementation requirements (cost and labour) for each intervention arm: personnel time required for intervention implementation (including training time, visit time and preparation time), intervention specific equipment and maintenance, and cost of each activity per participant for the 6-month intervention period. A full cost-analysis evaluation of the intervention implementation is currently underway. Total accrued cost over the 6 month period compared to the other intervention.
Yale Food Addiction Scale6 monthsYale Food Addiction Scale-Children (YFAS-c). The 25-tem scale assesses seven diagnostic criteria for substance dependence as it relates to eating. Items are answered on a 7-point Likert Scale ranging from 0 (never) to 7 (every day). Participants who report three or more symptoms and clinically significant impairment meet the criteria for food addiction (FA). The YFAS-c has shown good test-retest reliability. Reliability analyses have shown high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81) in the general paediatric population, and test-retest reliability between 0.79 and 0.84 in studies conducted in ethnically diverse paediatric populations. Total Score: The total score on the YFAS ranges from 0 to 11. A score of 0 indicates no symptoms of food addiction, while a score of 11 indicates the highest level of symptoms consistent with food addiction. Total Score Range: 0 to 11 Loss of Control Subscale Range: 0 to 5 Persistent Use Subscale Range: 0 to 6

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Parents were not enrolled. Only adolescents provided informed consent to enroll in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
App Plus Coaching (AC)
6 month addiction model based weight loss intervention in the form of an iPhone app coupled with personalized coaching. App: a. 6 month app intervention: Problem Food Withdrawal, Snacking Elimination and Food Amount Reduction b. Daily Weigh In c. App based reminders d. Follow Up: Face-to-face clinic visits at 3,6,12 and 18 months. Coaching: a. 6 month addiction based intervention: Problem Food Withdrawal, Snacking Elimination and Food Amount Reduction. b. Daily Weighing c. Daily Text messages from Coach d. Weekly 15 minute phone meetings with Coach e. Follow Up: Face-to-face clinic visits at 3,6,12 and 18 months post consent
54
App Alone (AA)
6 month addiction model based weight loss intervention in the form of an iPhone app. App: a. 6 month app intervention: Problem Food Withdrawal, Snacking Elimination and Food Amount Reduction b. Daily Weigh In c. App based reminders d. Follow Up: Face-to-face clinic visits at 3,6,12 and 18 months.
53
Clinic
In-Clinic Multi-disciplinary monthly weight management program. Curriculum adapted from the KidsNFitness Program and administered by an MD, RD, Psychologist and Health Educator over 90 minute sessions Clinic: Modified KidsNFitness: a. 6 month in-clinic, evidence-based, multi-disciplinary intervention b. 90 minute sessions, in clinic that occur every month for 6 months c. Follow Up: Face-to-face clinic visits Monthly x 6 months followed by face-to-face visit at12 and 18 months.
54
Total161

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicApp Plus Coaching (AC)App Alone (AA)ClinicTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
54 Participants53 Participants54 Participants161 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous15 years16 years16 years16 years
Body Mass Index Z-score2.2 Z-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
2.2 Z-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
2.3 Z-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
2.2 Z-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants29 Participants28 Participants77 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
34 Participants24 Participants26 Participants84 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
54 participants53 participants54 participants161 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants32 Participants39 Participants105 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants21 Participants15 Participants56 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 540 / 530 / 54
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 540 / 530 / 54
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 540 / 530 / 54

Outcome results

Primary

%BMIp95

Mean change in excess BMI percent over the 95th percentile (%BMIp95) over the study period compared at 6 months to baseline. value at 6 months minus value at baseline

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
App Plus Coaching (AC)%BMIp95-1.9 percentStandard Deviation 1
App Alone (AA)%BMIp95-1.2 percentStandard Deviation 1.2
Clinic%BMIp95-1.5 percentStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

Cost Analysis

Real life economic analysis of the intervention arms compared to each other and in in-clinic intervention. The following data were collected throughout the study period to assess the implementation requirements (cost and labour) for each intervention arm: personnel time required for intervention implementation (including training time, visit time and preparation time), intervention specific equipment and maintenance, and cost of each activity per participant for the 6-month intervention period. A full cost-analysis evaluation of the intervention implementation is currently underway. Total accrued cost over the 6 month period compared to the other intervention.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Each groups' implementation cost was evaluated

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
App Plus Coaching (AC)Cost Analysis2076 US dollarsStandard Deviation 150
App Alone (AA)Cost Analysis1122 US dollarsStandard Deviation 135
ClinicCost Analysis4034 US dollarsStandard Deviation 178
Secondary

Yale Food Addiction Scale

Yale Food Addiction Scale-Children (YFAS-c). The 25-tem scale assesses seven diagnostic criteria for substance dependence as it relates to eating. Items are answered on a 7-point Likert Scale ranging from 0 (never) to 7 (every day). Participants who report three or more symptoms and clinically significant impairment meet the criteria for food addiction (FA). The YFAS-c has shown good test-retest reliability. Reliability analyses have shown high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81) in the general paediatric population, and test-retest reliability between 0.79 and 0.84 in studies conducted in ethnically diverse paediatric populations. Total Score: The total score on the YFAS ranges from 0 to 11. A score of 0 indicates no symptoms of food addiction, while a score of 11 indicates the highest level of symptoms consistent with food addiction. Total Score Range: 0 to 11 Loss of Control Subscale Range: 0 to 5 Persistent Use Subscale Range: 0 to 6

Time frame: 6 months

Population: YFAS-c was completed at baseline and throughout the study period. It has been well assessed in adolescents with obesity that up to 25-30% report positive YFAS-c scores consistent with addictive like eating behaviors.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
App Plus Coaching (AC)Yale Food Addiction Scale-0.5 score on a scale
App Alone (AA)Yale Food Addiction Scale-0.5 score on a scale
ClinicYale Food Addiction Scale0 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026