Medication Free Treatment: Characteristics, Justification and Outcome

Mental Illness

Medication free treatment, mental illness, outcome

In 2015 the Norwegian government, after initiative from user organizations, decided to implement medication free inpatient treatment units. The goal is to secure real options to medication for psychiatric illness, and to gather experiences with medication free options. Freedom of choice is a main concern. The projects main aim is to study the outcome of medication free treatments of mental illness compared to treatment as usual, as well as characteristics of the treatment and the treatment population and why patients choose this treatment. Hereunder we aim to document who asks for these kinds of services and why, what kind of treatment they get, how they experience it, and how they respond to this kind of treatment. An important part will be to document whether the goal of increased freedom of choice between real treatment options is fulfilled. Research questions 1. Does medication free treatment differ from treatment as usual? Are there any unique characteristics of the patient group who asks for this kind of treatment? What kind of treatment do they receive during their stay? How do they experience this treatment in comparison to treatment as usual? How is this in relation to the goals about increased freedom of choice? Does use of medication change during and/or after medication free treatment? 2. Why do patients choose medication free treatment? What are their reasons? What experiences lead to this wish? 3. What is the outcome of medication free treatment compared to treatment as usual?

Background In 2015 the Norwegian government, after initiative from user organizations, decided to implement medication free inpatient treatment units. The goal is to secure real options to medication for psychiatric illness, and to gather experiences with medication free options. Freedom of choice is a main concern. (Aksjon for medisinfrie tilbud) The local unit under study DPS døgn Moenga at Akershus University Hospital has been given the assignment of developing a medication free treatment unit. This is an inpatient treatment unit for voluntary, planned treatment. High suicidal risk, severe acting out, active drug abuse etc. is excluded. The treatment program is 8 weeks long. Status of knowledge The project has been controversial, especially with reference to the status of knowledge. Critiques have stated that the knowledge base for treating serious psychiatric disorders without medication is lacking (Gundersen, 2016; Røssberg, 2016). Concerns are raised about whether it can be harmful (Røssberg, 2016), whether it is necessary (Røssberg, Andreassen, & Malt, 2016) and whether it creates unfortunate dividing lines within health care (Røssberg et al., 2016). National guidelines recommend considering/offering medication for bipolar disorders, deep depression and psychosis (Helsedirektoratet, 2009, 2012, 2013). On the other hand, the knowledge base for use of psychotropic drugs is also being questioned, especially regarding long term effects (Bentall, 2009; Forand & DeRubeis, 2013; Moncrieff, 2009; Sohler et al., 2016; Whitaker, 2010/2014 (no), 2016). Studies on medication are amongst others criticized for not taking withdrawal effect sufficiently into account (Bentall, 2009; Forand & DeRubeis, 2013; Moncrieff, 2009; Whitaker, 2010/2014 (no), 2016). A randomized controlled study by Wunderink, Nieboer, Wiersma, Sytema, and Nienhuis (2013) indicates a follow up period of at least 3 years is necessary to see the benefits of drug reduction regarding antipsychotics. Summing up, one can argue that generally, a considerable research base point to psychosocial treatment methods having an important place in the treatment of most psychiatric problems (Lambert, 2013; Wampold, 2001; Wampold & Imel, 2015). The more specific questions regarding pure psychosocial treatment for serious disorders and long term effects of psychotropic drugs are at least disputable, and probably under-researched. Research questions 1. Does medication free treatment differ from treatment as usual? Patient characteristics, treatment received, experience, medication use. 2. Why do patients choose medication free treatment? What are their reasons? What experiences lead to this wish? 3. What is the outcome of medication free treatment compared to treatment as usual? Hypotheses The treatment outcome of medication free treatment is not inferior to treatment as usual. Patients in medication free treatment will use less medication. Medication withdrawal may affect outcome in the short run. Project methodology The design of the study is a mixed methods, observational design within a naturalistic treatment setting using qualitative and quantitative methods to address the research questions. Moenga consist of two units, the medication free unit and a regular unit, which will be included for comparison. In addition we include a treatment unit on a different location for comparison; DPS Myrvegen. We aim for at least 200 n. One complication is that this autumn it was decided that the units at Moenga shall move and reorganize sometime during 2018. This entail change of location, possible reorganizing of personnel and that the comparison unit at Moenga is joined with another inpatient unit at the new location. This may cause disruptions that can affect our results. We will study possible effects of this in our data, and may exclude parts of the gathered data and prolong the inclusion period. We will collect survey data at start of treatment, weekly during treatment, at end of treatment (Work package 1), and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years follow up (work package 3). Register data will be collected 3 years back and 3 years follow up (work package 3). Patient interviews (work package 2) and personnel interviews (work package 4) are performed during spring 2018, the patient interviews near the end of the treatment stay. See measures for details. Plan for data analyses Quantitative and qualitative analyses will be done according to the research questions. We will seek to compare the medication free unit and treatment as usual. Calculating propensity scores in the observational part of the study will be considered, to balance comparison groups (Austin, 2011). Statistical power Exact power calculations are only possible in concrete, delimited statistical designs, and must necessarily be based on assumptions not always known before starting the study. In a design with 200 persons the total effect of one-way analysis of variance yield a statistical power of .80 for small to medium effect sizes. That is, the probability of detecting differences between groups will be .80 for effect sizes in the range .40 -.50. For pairwise comparisons between groups (with N=50), the probability of detecting effects in the range of Cohen's d \>=. 40 will be about .80. In Cohen's pragmatic system, effect sizes with such magnitudes represent a small to medium effect size. These estimations will also apply to change-scores between two points in time, given that the correlation between the two repeated measurements are r \>= .5. Study plan Data collection: Work package 1: Inclusion of patients for quantitative measurements starts April 2018 with a 12 months inclusion period. This may be prolonged if necessary. Work package 2: Patient interviews will be performed during spring 2018. Work package 3: Follow up measures and register data will be collected until spring 2022. Work package 4: Personnel interviews will be performed during spring 2018. Analysis Qualitative analyses will be performed within end of 2018. Quantitative analyses will start January 2019 Publishing Publishing of the results in scientific papers will take place mainly in 2019-2023. Articles 1. Medication free treatment: Does it differ from treatment as usual? This article will address research question 1 and include qualitative data, Collaborate, BMQ, Inspire, CSQ-8, WAI, treatment received, use of medication and background data. 2. Medication free treatment: Why? This article will address research question 2 (Why do patients choose medication free treatment) and include qualitative data. 3. Medication free treatment: Does it work? This article will address the research questions and will include the outcome measures OQ-45, AII, Quality of life, HoNOs, GAF, CGI, drug use, diagnoses and register data. We will also look for correlations between use of medication and outcome, and therefore include measures of medication use. Research group PhD Kristin S. Heiervang, head of the research group Quality and implementation in Mental Health Services at Akershus university hospital, is project manager (principal investigator) for the project. Anders S. Wenneberg, specialist in clinical psychology, is the leader of the inpatient treatment facility. Wenneberg is also the project manager of the Medication Free Treatment at Akershus University Hospital, Moenga. Ole André Solbakken is associate professor of clinical psychology and head of section at the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo. Odd Arne Tjersland is professor of clinical psychology at the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo. Jon T. Monsen is professor of clinical psychology at the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo. Allan Abbass is professor, psychiatrist, and founding Director of the Centre for Emotions and Health at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada. Kari Standal will be the PhD candidate. She is a psychologist at Akershus university hospital, specialized in adult treatment and psychotherapy (group treatment and affect consciousness). Jill Arild, board member of Mental Helse and leader of the action group for medication free treatment is user represantive in the project. Astrid Ringen Martinsen is a psychology student who will write her main thesis on the qualitative patient data. Ingrid Engeseth Brakstad is a psychology student who will write her main thesis on the qualitative personnel data.

Norway