Skip to content

Comparison of Standard Opioid Prescription Versus Prescription Guided by Pharmacogenetic Analysis in Patients With Non-cancerous Chronic Pain.

Comparison of Standard Opioid Prescription Versus Prescription Guided by Pharmacogenetic Analysis in Patients With Non-cancerous Chronic Pain.

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03498014
Acronym
AlgoPGx
Enrollment
0
Registered
2018-04-13
Start date
2022-07-31
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2023-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-cancerous Chronic Pain

Brief summary

The investigators hypothesize that opioid prescription guided by patient pharmacogenetic profile will diminish opioid-associated undesirable effects by 50% and improve medication compliance.

Interventions

OTHERPharmacogenetic analysis allowing personalized opioid prescription

Genotypic of patient to determine optimal opioid treatment (tramadol, codeine or oxycodone)

Opioid prescription made without reference to patient genetic profile (tramadol, codeine or oxycodone)

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form * The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan * The patient is at least 18 years old * The patient will be available for all visits * Patients suffer from non-cancerous chronic pain according to HAS criteria * Patient not having taking opioids in previous 2 months * Patient indicated for prescription of opioids (oxycodone, codeine or tramadol) or patient not responding to first line treatment

Exclusion criteria

* The subject is participating in an category I interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study * The subject refuses to sign the consent * It is impossible to give the subject informed information * The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship * The patient is pregnant or breastfeeding * The patient is likely to procreate and does not use an effective method of contraception (contraceptive ring, surgical contraception, implant, patch, contraceptive pill, male and female condoms, IUD) * There is a contra-indication for opioid use * Patient with an addiction risk (score ≥ 8 on ORT scale).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare presence/absence undesirable events associated to opioid between groups from predefined listMonth 1Presence/absence of at least one undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to list in Annex 17.5 of the protocol
Compare presence/absence undesirable events associated to opioid between groupsMonth 1Presence/absence of at least one undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare patient-reported pain between groupsDay 0Visual analog scare 1-10
Compare neuropathic pain between groupsDay 0DN4 score (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions); score between 0-10
Compare benefit/risk ratio of treatment between groupsMonth 1Overall Benefit of Analgesics Score (OBAS); score between 0-32
Compare quality of life between patients in each groupDay 0Quality of life Short Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire; score between 0-100
Compare medication compliance between groupsMonth 1Serum concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS)
Number of undesirable events associated to opioid between groupsMonth 1Total number of undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to list in protocol
Serum concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS)Day 0Opioids Risk Tool (ORT): scores of 0-3 (low risk), 4-7 (moderate risk), or ≥ 8 (high risk)
Compare observed medication misuse between groupsMonth 1Prescription Opioid Misuse Index (POMI)
Correlation between predicted phenotype and observed metabolic ratiosMonth 1Products/substrate ratio measured by high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-HRMS)
Metabolic profile of patientsMonth 1Extensive Metaboliser, Intermediate Metaboliser, Poor Metaboliser or Ultra-rapid Metaboliser according to CYP2D6 phenotype and polymorphism of the glucuronyl transferase gene UGT2B7
Correlation between saliva and plasma concentration of opioidsMonth 1Concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS)
Qualitive comparison of medication compliance between groupsMonth 1Presence/absence of opioids or metabolites in serum
Compare clinical therapeutic efficacy between groupsMonth 1Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score; value between 1-7

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026